Chile has a GDP of $357B compared to $28.9B for Zambia, ranking 45/197 and 116/197 by economy size, respectively.
Chile has $149B in government debt (41.8% of GDP), compared to $24.8B (86% of GDP) in Zambia.
Chile vs Zambia GDP by year
| Year | GDP, current $ | |
|---|---|---|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2025 | $357,371,159,575 | $28,879,806,220 |
| 2024 | $329,260,633,699 | $25,303,185,342 |
| 2023 | $335,802,745,366 | $27,577,956,471 |
| 2022 | $301,099,244,104 | $29,163,782,140 |
| 2021 | $315,507,493,783 | $22,096,416,932 |
| 2020 | $254,103,710,483 | $18,137,764,931 |
| 2019 | $278,308,438,545 | $23,308,667,781 |
| 2018 | $295,857,562,992 | $26,311,507,274 |
| 2017 | $276,154,259,981 | $25,873,601,261 |
| 2016 | $249,344,863,928 | $20,958,412,538 |
| 2015 | $242,450,355,831 | $21,251,216,799 |
| 2014 | $259,560,978,224 | $27,141,023,558 |
| 2013 | $277,395,018,842 | $28,037,239,463 |
| 2012 | $267,024,782,487 | $25,503,060,420 |
| 2011 | $251,382,573,894 | $23,459,515,276 |
| 2010 | $217,051,209,239 | $20,265,559,484 |
| 2009 | $171,777,900,624 | $15,328,342,304 |
| 2008 | $179,894,594,475 | $17,910,858,638 |
| 2007 | $172,491,076,034 | $14,056,957,976 |
| 2006 | $153,843,518,171 | $12,756,858,899 |
| 2005 | $122,294,145,163 | $8,331,870,169 |
| 2004 | $99,075,985,774 | $6,221,110,219 |
| 2003 | $76,492,579,644 | $4,901,869,764 |
| 2002 | $70,264,045,939 | $4,193,850,445 |
| 2001 | $71,574,739,561 | $4,094,441,301 |
| 2000 | $78,339,750,721 | $3,600,632,111 |
| 1999 | $75,578,685,736 | $3,404,284,891 |
| 1998 | $81,990,010,704 | $3,537,741,942 |
| 1997 | $85,741,415,285 | $4,303,288,480 |
| 1996 | $78,584,098,984 | $3,597,220,962 |
| 1995 | $73,820,425,702 | $3,806,983,413 |
| 1994 | $57,438,273,591 | $3,656,806,166 |
| 1993 | $49,934,943,321 | $3,273,505,344 |
| 1992 | $46,538,895,686 | $3,182,810,841 |
| 1991 | $38,232,330,917 | $3,376,806,697 |
| 1990 | $33,428,580,448 | $3,288,381,797 |
| 1989 | $30,101,767,991 | $3,994,673,161 |
| 1988 | $26,174,858,614 | $3,728,878,149 |
| 1987 | $22,605,488,851 | $2,265,250,972 |
| 1986 | $19,197,818,085 | $1,664,413,508 |
| 1985 | $17,933,557,360 | $2,252,454,500 |
| 1984 | $19,974,595,028 | $2,719,518,933 |
| 1983 | $20,629,678,694 | $3,321,048,451 |
| 1982 | $19,710,229,067 | $3,871,117,093 |
| 1981 | $35,180,322,211 | $4,008,126,497 |
| 1980 | $29,586,676,576 | $3,884,530,854 |
| 1979 | $22,249,574,628 | $3,353,445,378 |
| 1978 | $16,373,093,554 | $2,811,032,473 |
| 1977 | $14,272,711,437 | $2,515,296,940 |
| 1976 | $10,523,479,089 | $2,742,859,263 |
| 1975 | $7,812,161,793 | $2,442,672,141 |
| 1974 | $16,584,311,220 | $2,910,981,262 |
| 1973 | $17,237,336,173 | $2,434,255,237 |
| 1972 | $12,057,501,635 | $1,872,416,680 |
| 1971 | $10,999,807,567 | $1,653,259,341 |
| 1970 | $9,261,006,540 | $1,788,779,285 |
| 1969 | $8,456,519,044 | $1,926,399,230 |
| 1968 | $7,286,820,526 | $1,573,739,371 |
| 1967 | $7,145,068,068 | $1,340,639,464 |
| 1966 | $7,256,882,086 | $1,238,999,505 |
| 1965 | $6,183,988,944 | $1,061,199,576 |
| 1964 | $6,065,708,668 | $822,639,671 |
| 1963 | $5,702,520,146 | $704,339,719 |
| 1962 | $5,765,971,144 | $679,279,729 |
| 1961 | $4,948,564,551 | $682,359,727 |
| 1960 | $4,211,103,677 | $698,739,721 |
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY 
GDP per capita in Chile vs Zambia by year
| Year | Current $ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|||
| GDP per capita | GDP per capita, PPP | GDP per capita | GDP per capita, PPP | |
| 2025 | $17,995 | - | $1,318 | - |
| 2024 | $16,659 | $36,181 | $1,187 | $4,215 |
| 2023 | $17,082 | $33,145 | $1,331 | $4,077 |
| 2022 | $15,399 | $30,932 | $1,447 | $3,841 |
| 2021 | $16,216 | $29,090 | $1,127 | $3,503 |
| 2020 | $13,118 | $25,351 | $952 | $3,157 |
| 2019 | $14,497 | $25,612 | $1,259 | $3,361 |
| 2018 | $15,659 | $25,305 | $1,464 | $3,442 |
| 2017 | $14,880 | $24,295 | $1,483 | $3,392 |
| 2016 | $13,650 | $23,257 | $1,239 | $3,313 |
| 2015 | $13,434 | $22,468 | $1,296 | $3,337 |
| 2014 | $14,530 | $22,554 | $1,707 | $3,441 |
| 2013 | $15,684 | $22,201 | $1,821 | $3,477 |
| 2012 | $15,242 | $21,366 | $1,710 | $3,324 |
| 2011 | $14,487 | $20,122 | $1,625 | $3,228 |
| 2010 | $12,633 | $17,918 | $1,451 | $3,098 |
| 2009 | $10,099 | $15,951 | $1,136 | $2,872 |
| 2008 | $10,683 | $16,376 | $1,376 | $2,708 |
| 2007 | $10,346 | $16,698 | $1,119 | $2,555 |
| 2006 | $9,319 | $15,511 | $1,052 | $2,378 |
| 2005 | $7,480 | $12,550 | $711 | $2,213 |
| 2004 | $6,121 | $11,612 | $549 | $2,068 |
| 2003 | $4,773 | $10,708 | $446 | $1,942 |
| 2002 | $4,431 | $10,133 | $394 | $1,837 |
| 2001 | $4,564 | $9,776 | $397 | $1,785 |
| 2000 | $5,053 | $9,376 | $359 | $1,709 |
| 1999 | $4,934 | $8,839 | $350 | $1,654 |
| 1998 | $5,420 | $8,850 | $373 | $1,601 |
| 1997 | $5,742 | $8,510 | $466 | $1,631 |
| 1996 | $5,334 | $7,895 | $400 | $1,585 |
| 1995 | $5,081 | $7,232 | $433 | $1,501 |
| 1994 | $4,012 | $6,476 | $426 | $1,464 |
| 1993 | $3,541 | $6,061 | $391 | $1,607 |
| 1992 | $3,352 | $5,563 | $389 | $1,505 |
| 1991 | $2,798 | $4,886 | $423 | $1,534 |
| 1990 | $2,488 | $4,444 | $422 | $1,522 |
| 1989 | $2,278 | - | $526 | - |
| 1988 | $2,014 | - | $504 | - |
| 1987 | $1,767 | - | $315 | - |
| 1986 | $1,525 | - | $238.2 | - |
| 1985 | $1,447 | - | $332 | - |
| 1984 | $1,636 | - | $413 | - |
| 1983 | $1,715 | - | $520 | - |
| 1982 | $1,663 | - | $627 | - |
| 1981 | $3,012 | - | $670 | - |
| 1980 | $2,571 | - | $669 | - |
| 1979 | $1,962 | - | $595 | - |
| 1978 | $1,465 | - | $514 | - |
| 1977 | $1,297 | - | $474 | - |
| 1976 | $971 | - | $533 | - |
| 1975 | $732 | - | $490 | - |
| 1974 | $1,579 | - | $601 | - |
| 1973 | $1,667 | - | $518 | - |
| 1972 | $1,185 | - | $410 | - |
| 1971 | $1,099 | - | $372 | - |
| 1970 | $941 | - | $414 | - |
| 1969 | $874 | - | $459 | - |
| 1968 | $766 | - | $387 | - |
| 1967 | $764 | - | $341 | - |
| 1966 | $790 | - | $325 | - |
| 1965 | $686 | - | $287.4 | - |
| 1964 | $686 | - | $230 | - |
| 1963 | $658 | - | $203.2 | - |
| 1962 | $679 | - | $202.3 | - |
| 1961 | $594 | - | $209.7 | - |
| 1960 | $516 | - | $221.6 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
Chile's GDP per capita is $17,995, ranking 67/197, compared to $1,318 in Zambia, ranking 170/197. Adjusted for purchasing power (GDP per capita PPP), Chile ranks 63rd at $36,181, while Zambia ranks 166th at $4,215.
Economic indicators
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gross domestic product |
$357B
2025 |
$28.9B
2025 |
| GDP rank |
45/197
2025 |
116/197
2025 |
| GDP growth |
2.46%
2024-2025 |
3.76%
2024-2025 |
| GDP per capita |
$17,995
2025 |
$1,318
2025 |
| GDP per capita rank |
67/197
2025 |
170/197
2025 |
| GDP per capita, PPP |
$36,181
2024 |
$4,215
2024 |
| GDP per capita PPP rank |
63/197
2024 |
166/197
2024 |
| Government debt |
$149B
2025 |
$24.8B
2025 |
| Debt-to-GDP ratio |
41.8%
2025 |
86%
2025 |
| Government debt per person |
$7,517
2025 |
$1,133
2025 |
| Government debt per person rank |
68/185
2025 |
140/185
2025 |
| Average annual personal income after taxes |
$10,041
2026 |
$1,538
2026 |
| Market capitalization of domestic companies |
$487B
2025 |
$14.9B
2025 |
| Number of millionaires |
81,274
2024 |
n/a |
| Number of billionaires |
6
2026 |
n/a |
| Income share by richest 10% |
34.3%
2024 |
39.1%
2022 |
| Income share by poorest 10% |
2.3%
2024 |
1.5%
2022 |
| Government expenditure, % of GDP |
26.4%
2025 |
29.7%
2025 |
| Consumer prices inflation |
4.21%
2024-2025 |
13.9%
2024-2025 |
| Central bank interest rate |
4.75%
2025 |
13.3%
2026 |
| Unemployment rate |
8.89%
2025 |
5.67%
2024 |
| Population |
19992079
|
22844606
|
Spending and national debt comparison by year
| Year | % of GDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|||
| Government spending | Government debt | Government spending | Government debt | |
| 2025 | 26.4% | 41.8% | 29.7% | 86% |
| 2024 | 26.7% | 41.7% | 26.5% | 125.2% |
| 2023 | 27.4% | 39.4% | 27.4% | 129.1% |
| 2022 | 26.7% | 37.9% | 28.2% | 99.5% |
| 2021 | 33.6% | 36.4% | 30.5% | 111% |
| 2020 | 29.1% | 32.4% | 34% | 140% |
| 2019 | 26.5% | 28.3% | 29.8% | 103.3% |
| 2018 | 25.6% | 25.8% | 27.7% | 81.2% |
| 2017 | 25.5% | 23.7% | 25% | 66.6% |
| 2016 | 25.4% | 21.1% | 23.9% | 61.2% |
| 2015 | 25% | 17.4% | 27.6% | 61.9% |
| 2014 | 23.9% | 15% | 24.3% | 33.9% |
| 2013 | 23.1% | 12.8% | 24% | 25.9% |
| 2012 | 23.1% | 11.9% | 21.9% | 24.9% |
| 2011 | 22.9% | 11.1% | 19.5% | 20.8% |
| 2010 | 23.5% | 8.61% | 18.1% | 18.9% |
| 2009 | 25% | 5.84% | 17.8% | 20.5% |
| 2008 | 21.8% | 4.92% | 19.5% | 19.2% |
| 2007 | 19.3% | 3.9% | 19.9% | 21.9% |
| 2006 | 18.7% | 5.02% | 19.7% | 25% |
| 2005 | 20.2% | 7.04% | 22.5% | 75.7% |
| 2004 | 20.8% | 10.3% | 23.3% | 129.9% |
| 2003 | 22.2% | 12.6% | 27.3% | 159.5% |
| 2002 | 23.2% | 15% | 27.6% | 180.2% |
| 2001 | 23.2% | 14.3% | 28% | 210.2% |
| 2000 | 22.9% | 13.1% | 21.4% | 261% |
| 1999 | 23.7% | 13.3% | - | - |
| 1998 | 21.9% | 12.1% | - | - |
| 1997 | 20.6% | 12.8% | - | - |
| 1996 | 20.6% | 14.6% | - | - |
| 1995 | 19.5% | 17.3% | - | - |
| 1994 | 20.6% | 22.6% | - | - |
| 1993 | 21.2% | 28.1% | - | - |
| 1992 | 20.9% | 30.5% | - | - |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 37.1% | - | - |
| 1990 | 21% | 50.3% | - | - |
| 1989 | 19.8% | 51.9% | - | - |
| 1988 | 21.3% | 71.2% | - | - |
| 1987 | 22.9% | 81.6% | - | - |
| 1986 | 26.6% | 88.4% | - | - |
| 1985 | 28.5% | 79.8% | - | - |
| 1984 | 30% | 56.6% | - | - |
| 1983 | 29.2% | 45.5% | - | - |
| 1982 | 30.1% | 20.3% | - | - |
| 1981 | 26.4% | 14% | - | - |
| 1980 | 23.8% | 17.4% | - | - |
| 1979 | 24.8% | 23.2% | - | - |
| 1978 | 29.4% | 26% | - | - |
| 1977 | 30% | 16.5% | - | - |
| 1976 | 30% | 19.5% | - | - |
| 1975 | 33.6% | 28.4% | - | - |
| 1974 | 32.3% | 18.8% | - | - |
| 1973 | 30.8% | 11.1% | - | - |
| 1972 | 35% | 10.1% | - | - |
| 1971 | 27.2% | 20% | - | - |
| 1970 | 21.1% | 26.3% | - | - |
| 1969 | 18.7% | 21.5% | - | - |
| 1968 | 19.3% | 17.9% | - | - |
| 1967 | 19.1% | 14.9% | - | - |
| 1966 | 20.5% | 12.6% | - | - |
| 1965 | 20.5% | 12.6% | - | - |
| 1964 | 17.8% | 9.6% | - | - |
| 1963 | 18.9% | 9.23% | - | - |
| 1962 | 21.3% | 6.99% | - | - |
| 1961 | 19.5% | 7.97% | - | - |
| 1960 | 19.7% | 7.02% | - | - |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08); International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1960–1990, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
In 2025, Chile's government spending was $94.2B, accounting for 26.4% of its GDP, while Zambia spent $8.58B, or 29.7% of GDP.
Debt-to-GDP ratio is 41.8% in Chile and 86% in Zambia, ranking 126/185 and 35/185, respectively.
Government deficit by year
| Year | Deficit/surplus, % of GDP | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2025 | -2.78% | -3.83% |
| 2024 | -2.82% | -3.46% |
| 2023 | -2.27% | -5.48% |
| 2022 | 1.36% | -7.82% |
| 2021 | -7.53% | -8.13% |
| 2020 | -7.1% | -13.8% |
| 2019 | -2.73% | -9.41% |
| 2018 | -1.48% | -8.31% |
| 2017 | -2.63% | -7.5% |
| 2016 | -2.66% | -5.69% |
| 2015 | -2.09% | -8.88% |
| 2014 | -1.5% | -5.43% |
| 2013 | -0.47% | -6.4% |
| 2012 | 0.68% | -3.16% |
| 2011 | 1.43% | -1.78% |
| 2010 | -0.36% | -2.43% |
| 2009 | -4.26% | -2.06% |
| 2008 | 3.93% | -0.67% |
| 2007 | 7.95% | -1.04% |
| 2006 | 7.51% | 16.9% |
| 2005 | 4.57% | -2.37% |
| 2004 | 2.05% | -2.51% |
| 2003 | -0.42% | -5.31% |
| 2002 | -1.17% | -4.5% |
| 2001 | -0.49% | -5.89% |
| 2000 | -0.69% | 1.16% |
| 1999 | -2.02% | - |
| 1998 | 0.39% | - |
| 1997 | 2.04% | - |
| 1996 | 2.07% | - |
| 1995 | 3.1% | - |
| 1994 | 1.44% | - |
| 1993 | 1.42% | - |
| 1992 | 2.11% | - |
| 1991 | 1.54% | - |
| 1990 | 2.25% | - |
| 1989 | 5.31% | - |
| 1988 | 4.07% | - |
| 1987 | 2.36% | - |
| 1986 | -0.92% | - |
| 1985 | -2.22% | - |
| 1984 | -2.95% | - |
| 1983 | -2.67% | - |
| 1982 | -1.02% | - |
| 1981 | 2.56% | - |
| 1980 | 5.41% | - |
| 1979 | 4.82% | - |
| 1978 | -0.11% | - |
| 1977 | -1.11% | - |
| 1976 | -0.48% | - |
| 1975 | -0.41% | - |
| 1974 | -5.79% | - |
| 1973 | -7.32% | - |
| 1972 | -12.7% | - |
| 1971 | -7.98% | - |
| 1970 | -1.22% | - |
| 1969 | 0.6% | - |
| 1968 | -0.79% | - |
| 1967 | -0.64% | - |
| 1966 | -1.88% | - |
| 1965 | -1.64% | - |
| 1964 | -2.24% | - |
| 1963 | -3.29% | - |
| 1962 | -4.31% | - |
| 1961 | -2.89% | - |
| 1960 | -3.14% | - |
| 1959 | 1.56% | - |
| 1958 | -0.1% | - |
| 1957 | -0.71% | - |
| 1956 | -1.3% | - |
| 1955 | -2.79% | - |
| 1954 | -2.84% | - |
| 1953 | -4.05% | - |
| 1952 | -1.82% | - |
| 1951 | -0.71% | - |
| 1950 | -0.92% | - |
| 1949 | 1.71% | - |
| 1948 | 2.56% | - |
| 1947 | -0.2% | - |
| 1946 | 0.12% | - |
| 1945 | 0.73% | - |
| 1944 | 0.25% | - |
| 1943 | 0.81% | - |
| 1942 | 1.51% | - |
| 1941 | 1.9% | - |
| 1940 | 2.64% | - |
| 1939 | 1.74% | - |
| 1938 | 1.25% | - |
| 1937 | 1.42% | - |
| 1936 | 2.62% | - |
| 1935 | 4.23% | - |
| 1934 | 2.42% | - |
| 1933 | 1.76% | - |
| 1932 | -0.32% | - |
| 1931 | -2.73% | - |
| 1930 | 1.47% | - |
| 1929 | 1.89% | - |
| 1928 | 4.11% | - |
| 1927 | -0.17% | - |
| 1926 | -3.23% | - |
| 1925 | 2.44% | - |
| 1924 | 3.68% | - |
| 1923 | 2.87% | - |
| 1922 | -0.23% | - |
| 1921 | -0.57% | - |
| 1920 | -1.8% | - |
| 1919 | -2.53% | - |
| 1918 | 0.71% | - |
| 1917 | 0.49% | - |
| 1916 | 0.98% | - |
| 1915 | -2.13% | - |
| 1914 | -2.67% | - |
| 1913 | -2.23% | - |
| 1912 | -3.29% | - |
| 1911 | -3.32% | - |
| 1910 | -3.17% | - |
| 1909 | -2.26% | - |
| 1908 | -0.84% | - |
| 1907 | -2.39% | - |
| 1906 | -2.8% | - |
| 1905 | -1.31% | - |
| 1904 | -1.6% | - |
| 1903 | -1.35% | - |
| 1902 | -3.65% | - |
| 1901 | -3.93% | - |
| 1900 | -1.89% | - |
| 1899 | -0.78% | - |
| 1898 | -3.84% | - |
| 1897 | -1.78% | - |
| 1896 | -5.36% | - |
| 1895 | -2.31% | - |
| 1894 | 0.82% | - |
| 1893 | -0.59% | - |
| 1892 | -1.33% | - |
| 1891 | -6.72% | - |
| 1890 | -3.65% | - |
| 1889 | -2.71% | - |
| 1888 | -0.58% | - |
| 1887 | -4% | - |
| 1886 | -5.17% | - |
| 1885 | -2.46% | - |
| 1884 | -3.23% | - |
| 1883 | -3.57% | - |
| 1882 | -2.86% | - |
| 1881 | -1.83% | - |
| 1880 | -2% | - |
| 1879 | -4.34% | - |
| 1878 | -2.27% | - |
| 1877 | -3.88% | - |
| 1876 | -3.17% | - |
| 1875 | -3.73% | - |
| 1874 | -4.75% | - |
| 1873 | -1.94% | - |
| 1872 | -1.78% | - |
| 1871 | -2.38% | - |
| 1870 | -1.83% | - |
| 1869 | -1.07% | - |
| 1868 | -2.85% | - |
| 1867 | -4.31% | - |
| 1866 | -5.72% | - |
| 1865 | -1.95% | - |
| 1864 | -1.07% | - |
| 1863 | -0.26% | - |
| 1862 | -0.13% | - |
| 1861 | -0.5% | - |
| 1860 | -0.07% | - |
| 1859 | -1.6% | - |
| 1858 | -1.37% | - |
| 1857 | -0.3% | - |
| 1856 | 0.11% | - |
| 1855 | 0.1% | - |
| 1854 | -0.2% | - |
| 1853 | 0.27% | - |
| 1852 | 0.68% | - |
| 1851 | -0.39% | - |
| 1850 | 0.35% | - |
| 1849 | 0.6% | - |
| 1848 | -0.25% | - |
| 1847 | 0.04% | - |
| 1846 | 0.36% | - |
| 1845 | -0.21% | - |
| 1844 | 0.48% | - |
| 1843 | 0.69% | - |
| 1842 | 1.1% | - |
| 1841 | 0.31% | - |
| 1840 | 0.34% | - |
| 1839 | 0.25% | - |
| 1838 | -0.21% | - |
| 1837 | -0.05% | - |
| 1836 | -0.17% | - |
| 1835 | -0.58% | - |
| 1834 | -0.39% | - |
| 1833 | -0.45% | - |
| 1832 | -0.57% | - |
| 1831 | -0.77% | - |
| 1830 | -0.51% | - |
| 1829 | -0.06% | - |
| 1828 | -0.3% | - |
| 1827 | 0.07% | - |
| 1826 | -0.08% | - |
| 1825 | 0.05% | - |
| 1824 | -0.37% | - |
| 1823 | 0.98% | - |
| 1822 | 1.28% | - |
| 1821 | -0.19% | - |
| 1820 | 0.64% | - |
| 1819 | 0.16% | - |
| 1818 | 1.52% | - |
| 1817 | 0.94% | - |
| 1816 | 1.21% | - |
| 1815 | 1.53% | - |
| 1814 | 1.91% | - |
| 1813 | 2.34% | - |
| 1812 | 2.79% | - |
| 1811 | 3.24% | - |
| 1810 | 3.64% | - |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1810–1989, retrieved 2026-07-08); International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
In 2025, Chile's government deficit, the difference between spending and revenue, was $9.94B, equivalent to 2.78% of GDP. This compares to Zambia's deficit of $1.11B, or 3.83% of GDP.
Over the past 26 years, Chile recorded a fiscal deficit in 18 of those years, while Zambia ran a deficit in 24 years. On average, Chile posted an annual deficit equal to 0.54% of GDP, compared to deficit of 4.14% of GDP for Zambia.
Inflation comparison by year
| Year | Consumer prices inflation | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2025 | 4.21% | 13.9% |
| 2024 | 4.3% | 15% |
| 2023 | 7.58% | 10.9% |
| 2022 | 11.6% | 11% |
| 2021 | 4.52% | 22% |
| 2020 | 3.05% | 15.7% |
| 2019 | 2.56% | 9.2% |
| 2018 | 2.43% | 7.5% |
| 2017 | 2.18% | 6.6% |
| 2016 | 3.79% | 17.9% |
| 2015 | 4.35% | 10.1% |
| 2014 | 4.72% | 7.8% |
| 2013 | 1.79% | 7% |
| 2012 | 3.01% | 6.6% |
| 2011 | 3.34% | 8.7% |
| 2010 | 1.41% | 8.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35% | 13.4% |
| 2008 | 8.72% | 12.4% |
| 2007 | 4.41% | 10.7% |
| 2006 | 3.39% | 9% |
| 2005 | 3.05% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 1.05% | 18% |
| 2003 | 2.81% | 21.4% |
| 2002 | 2.49% | 22.2% |
| 2001 | 3.57% | 21.4% |
| 2000 | 3.84% | 24.1% |
| 1999 | 3.34% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 5.11% | 22.7% |
| 1997 | 6.13% | 21.4% |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | World Economic Outlook (1997–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08); World Bank | Economy & Growth (1997–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
Over the past 29 years, Chile has recorded an average annual inflation rate of 3.9%, compared with 14.4% in Zambia. In 2025, inflation was 4.21% in Chile and 13.9% in Zambia.
Top exports between countries
|
Chile
|
|
|---|---|
| Export category | Export value |
| Machinery & equipment | $1.79M |
| Metals | $755K |
| Chemicals & pharma | $745K |
| Processed food, beverages & tobacco | $36K |
| Miscellaneous | $21K |
| Textiles & consumer goods | $3K |
| Raw materials & minerals | $1K |
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|
| Export category | Export value |
| Metals | $1.2M |
| Machinery & equipment | $76K |
| Miscellaneous | $25K |
| Animal & marine products | $2K |
Balance of trade
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Current account balance
|
-$4.35B
2025 |
-$1.12B
2024 |
| Current account balance ranking |
161/190
2025 |
121/190
2024 |
| Current account balance, % of GDP |
-1.22%
2025 |
-4.41%
2024 |
| Goods imports |
$86.5B
2025 |
$10.1B
2024 |
| Goods exports |
$110B
2025 |
$11.4B
2024 |
| Service imports |
$21.9B
2025 |
$1.99B
2024 |
| Service exports |
$13B
2025 |
$1.38B
2024 |
| Imports of goods and services, % of GDP |
30.4%
2025 |
27.6%
2024 |
| Exports of goods and services, % of GDP |
34.6%
2025 |
35%
2024 |
Economic freedom indices
The indices of economic freedom below are issued by the Heritage Foundation. Higher scores indicate stronger economic health.
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Economic freedom | 74.3 | 51.9 |
| Economic freedom ranking | 20/197 | 152/197 |
| Property rights | 69.7 | 43.9 |
| Government integrity | 67.8 | 39.3 |
| Judicial effectiveness | 90.3 | 45 |
| Tax burden | 72.5 | 74.3 |
| Government spending | 78.2 | 78.1 |
| Fiscal health | 94.1 | 30.9 |
| Business freedom | 78.5 | 53.4 |
| Labor freedom | 56.8 | 48.8 |
| Monetary freedom | 75.1 | 66.6 |
| Trade freedom | 78 | 62.8 |
| Investment freedom | 60 | 40 |
| Financial freedom | 70 | 40 |
Economic freedom comparison by year
| Year | Economic freedom index | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2026 | 74.3 | 51.9 |
| 2025 | 73.2 | 50.9 |
| 2024 | 71.4 | 48.4 |
| 2023 | 71.1 | 47.8 |
| 2022 | 74.4 | 48.7 |
| 2021 | 75.2 | 50.4 |
| 2020 | 76.8 | 53.5 |
| 2019 | 75.4 | 53.6 |
| 2018 | 75.2 | 54.3 |
| 2017 | 76.5 | 55.8 |
| 2016 | 77.7 | 58.8 |
| 2015 | 78.5 | 58.7 |
| 2014 | 78.7 | 60.4 |
| 2013 | 79 | 58.7 |
| 2012 | 78.3 | 58.3 |
| 2011 | 77.4 | 59.7 |
| 2010 | 77.2 | 58 |
| 2009 | 78.3 | 56.6 |
| 2008 | 78.6 | 56.2 |
| 2007 | 77.7 | 56.2 |
| 2006 | 78 | 56.8 |
| 2005 | 77.8 | 55 |
| 2004 | 76.9 | 54.9 |
| 2003 | 76 | 55.3 |
| 2002 | 77.8 | 59.6 |
| 2001 | 75.1 | 59.5 |
| 2000 | 74.7 | 62.8 |
| 1999 | 74.1 | 64.2 |
| 1998 | 74.9 | 62.7 |
| 1997 | 75.9 | 62.1 |
| 1996 | 72.6 | 59.6 |
| 1995 | 71.2 | 55.1 |
Data sources: The Heritage Foundation | Economic Freedom Index (1995–2026, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
The Economic Freedom Index for Chile is 74.3, ranking 20/197, compared to 51.9 for Zambia, ranking 152/197. The chart above displays a comparison of annual changes in economic freedom indexes.
Other economic metrics
|
Chile
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Services, % of GDP |
55.5%
2025 |
57%
2025 |
| Industry, % of GDP |
31.4%
2025 |
35.3%
2025 |
| Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, % of GDP |
3.45%
2025 |
4.11%
2025 |
|
GNI, Atlas method
|
$337B
2025 |
$26.2B
2025 |
| GNI per capita, PPP |
$35,730
2025 |
$3,990
2025 |
| Total reserves including gold |
$49.4B
2025 |
$4.09B
2024 |
| Total reserves ranking |
48/177
2025 |
111/177
2024 |
|
Net foreign direct investment
|
-$5.83B
2025 |
-$2.05B
2024 |
|
Net inflows of foreign direct investment
|
$13.1B
2024 |
$2.36B
2024 |
|
Net outflows of foreign direct investment
|
$4.04B
2024 |
$311M
2024 |
|
Servicing debt to the IMF, % of GNI
|
n/a |
17.3%
2024 |
| Poverty at national poverty lines |
6.5%
2022 |
60%
2022 |
|
Gross capital formation, % of GDP
|
24.1%
2025 |
23.8%
2024 |
GDP per capita map
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1985–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08); U.S. Census Bureau (1985–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/chile/zambia | CC BY
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1810–1990, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- The Heritage Foundation | Economic Freedom Index (1995–2026, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1985–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- TradeMap (2020–2025, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (2026, retrieved 2026-07-08)
- LivingCost (2026, retrieved 2026-07-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.
The current account balance is the sum of net trade in goods and services, net earnings from cross-border investments, and net transfer payments. It reflects a country's economic transactions with the rest of the world and is a fundamental component of the balance of payments. A surplus indicates that a country exports more than it imports, while a deficit shows the opposite.
Gross National Income (GNI) measures a country's total income. It encompasses income earned by residents, businesses, and foreign sources, defined as employee compensation and investment profits. GNI adds product taxes not included elsewhere and subtracts subsidies. It accounts for income from residents working abroad but excludes earnings from foreigners within the country.
A negative value for Net Foreign Direct Investment indicates a country is a net receiver of investments, as foreign inflows exceed outflows after Balance of Payments adjustments. A positive value indicates a net provider, with outflows exceeding inflows. Inflows are credits (increasing foreign claims on domestic assets), while outflows are debits (increasing domestic assets abroad).
Foreign direct investment (FDI, net inflows) shows how much capital foreign investors bring into a country after accounting for any funds that flow back in the opposite direction. It represents the net value of overseas companies establishing, expanding, or financing businesses in the reporting country. A positive number means more capital entered the country than was withdrawn, while a negative number means foreign investors pulled out more than they invested.
Foreign direct investment (FDI, net outflows) shows how much capital residents of a country invest abroad after accounting for any funds that flow back in the opposite direction. It represents the net value of domestic companies establishing, expanding, or financing businesses in other countries. A positive number means more capital was invested abroad than withdrawn, while a negative number means residents pulled back more than they invested.
Principal and interest payments to the IMF in currency, goods, or services on long-term debt expressed as a share of GNI.
Formerly gross domestic investment, gross capital formation measures the share of a country’s economic output invested in fixed assets, including buildings, machinery, and infrastructure. It indicates how much of the economy is devoted to building productive capacity.