Brazil has a GDP of $2.19T compared to $99B for Sri Lanka, ranking 10/197 and 72/197 by economy size, respectively.
Brazil has $1.91T in government debt (87.3% of GDP), compared to $99.8B (100.8% of GDP) in Sri Lanka.
Brazil vs Sri Lanka GDP by year
| Year | GDP, current $ | |
|---|---|---|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | $2,185,821,648,944 | $98,963,185,510 |
| 2023 | $2,191,131,869,706 | $83,716,142,582 |
| 2022 | $1,951,923,832,084 | $74,143,020,263 |
| 2021 | $1,670,647,464,063 | $88,556,698,938 |
| 2020 | $1,476,107,292,152 | $84,335,574,582 |
| 2019 | $1,873,288,158,839 | $88,998,706,297 |
| 2018 | $1,916,933,708,353 | $94,450,015,983 |
| 2017 | $2,063,514,688,806 | $94,369,350,286 |
| 2016 | $1,795,693,265,999 | $88,000,211,172 |
| 2015 | $1,802,211,999,456 | $85,090,301,052 |
| 2014 | $2,456,043,766,032 | $82,531,125,191 |
| 2013 | $2,472,819,362,044 | $76,976,203,829 |
| 2012 | $2,465,228,293,707 | $70,447,217,164 |
| 2011 | $2,616,156,606,579 | $67,753,285,897 |
| 2010 | $2,208,838,108,484 | $58,636,049,434 |
| 2009 | $1,666,996,294,252 | $42,066,224,093 |
| 2008 | $1,695,855,391,758 | $40,713,826,215 |
| 2007 | $1,397,114,247,189 | $32,350,238,760 |
| 2006 | $1,107,626,711,163 | $28,267,410,543 |
| 2005 | $891,633,826,625 | $24,405,791,045 |
| 2004 | $669,289,321,945 | $20,662,525,941 |
| 2003 | $558,233,724,165 | $18,881,765,437 |
| 2002 | $509,795,270,685 | $16,536,535,647 |
| 2001 | $559,983,704,094 | $15,749,753,805 |
| 2000 | $655,448,188,259 | $16,595,882,819 |
| 1999 | $599,642,075,004 | $15,711,933,513 |
| 1998 | $863,711,007,325 | $15,760,736,956 |
| 1997 | $883,206,452,795 | $15,091,913,884 |
| 1996 | $850,426,433,004 | $13,897,738,375 |
| 1995 | $769,333,330,412 | $13,029,697,561 |
| 1994 | $525,369,851,354 | $11,717,604,209 |
| 1993 | $368,295,778,245 | $10,338,679,636 |
| 1992 | $328,187,960,872 | $9,703,011,636 |
| 1991 | $342,609,231,343 | $9,000,362,582 |
| 1990 | $390,725,626,003 | $8,032,551,173 |
| 1989 | $412,990,820,287 | $6,987,267,684 |
| 1988 | $307,881,930,752 | $6,978,371,581 |
| 1987 | $283,056,836,894 | $6,682,167,120 |
| 1986 | $256,480,852,471 | $6,405,210,564 |
| 1985 | $210,879,844,639 | $5,978,460,972 |
| 1984 | $188,339,974,087 | $6,043,474,843 |
| 1983 | $189,656,506,321 | $5,167,913,302 |
| 1982 | $271,314,113,768 | $4,768,765,017 |
| 1981 | $258,015,174,749 | $4,415,844,156 |
| 1980 | $237,393,489,893 | $4,024,621,900 |
| 1979 | $221,338,204,480 | $3,364,611,432 |
| 1978 | $200,278,646,124 | $2,733,183,857 |
| 1977 | $176,344,101,402 | $4,104,509,583 |
| 1976 | $153,168,949,208 | $3,591,319,857 |
| 1975 | $129,203,555,239 | $3,791,298,146 |
| 1974 | $109,794,519,728 | $3,574,586,466 |
| 1973 | $83,592,275,863 | $2,875,625,000 |
| 1972 | $58,434,858,375 | $2,553,936,348 |
| 1971 | $48,869,830,902 | $2,369,308,600 |
| 1970 | $42,327,664,794 | $2,296,470,588 |
| 1969 | $37,171,640,819 | $1,965,546,218 |
| 1968 | $33,930,457,425 | $1,801,344,538 |
| 1967 | $31,086,389,195 | $1,859,465,021 |
| 1966 | $28,283,323,733 | $1,751,470,588 |
| 1965 | $22,465,522,884 | $1,698,319,328 |
| 1964 | $20,963,733,695 | $1,309,747,899 |
| 1963 | $23,287,712,878 | $1,240,672,269 |
| 1962 | $19,231,747,852 | $1,434,156,379 |
| 1961 | $17,275,940,449 | $1,444,327,731 |
| 1960 | $17,030,465,539 | $1,409,873,950 |
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY 
GDP per capita in Brazil vs Sri Lanka by year
| Year | Current $ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|||
| GDP per capita | GDP per capita, PPP | GDP per capita | GDP per capita, PPP | |
| 2024 | $10,311 | $22,338 | $4,516 | $15,633 |
| 2023 | $10,378 | $21,176 | $3,799 | $14,456 |
| 2022 | $9,281 | $19,877 | $3,343 | $14,194 |
| 2021 | $7,973 | $18,076 | $3,997 | $14,316 |
| 2020 | $7,074 | $16,102 | $3,848 | $12,941 |
| 2019 | $9,030 | $16,070 | $4,082 | $14,113 |
| 2018 | $9,301 | $15,464 | $4,359 | $14,178 |
| 2017 | $10,081 | $14,559 | $4,399 | $13,610 |
| 2016 | $8,836 | $14,309 | $4,149 | $13,079 |
| 2015 | $8,936 | $14,821 | $4,058 | $12,227 |
| 2014 | $12,275 | $15,827 | $3,972 | $11,721 |
| 2013 | $12,459 | $15,722 | $3,739 | $11,253 |
| 2012 | $12,522 | $15,198 | $3,328 | $10,249 |
| 2011 | $13,397 | $15,212 | $3,225 | $9,076 |
| 2010 | $11,403 | $14,452 | $2,808 | $8,234 |
| 2009 | $8,679 | $13,391 | $2,027 | $7,576 |
| 2008 | $8,908 | $13,445 | $1,974 | $7,317 |
| 2007 | $7,410 | $12,673 | $1,579 | $6,820 |
| 2006 | $5,934 | $11,751 | $1,389 | $6,261 |
| 2005 | $4,828 | $11,081 | $1,207 | $5,679 |
| 2004 | $3,664 | $10,526 | $1,029 | $5,216 |
| 2003 | $3,091 | $9,802 | $946 | $4,850 |
| 2002 | $2,856 | $9,617 | $835 | $4,522 |
| 2001 | $3,176 | $9,304 | $804 | $4,328 |
| 2000 | $3,767 | $9,092 | $860 | $4,368 |
| 1999 | $3,494 | $8,635 | $829 | $4,103 |
| 1998 | $5,106 | $8,599 | $848 | $3,952 |
| 1997 | $5,299 | $8,602 | $827 | $3,804 |
| 1996 | $5,179 | $8,301 | $776 | $3,582 |
| 1995 | $4,757 | $8,097 | $742 | $3,454 |
| 1994 | $3,299 | $7,727 | $678 | $3,260 |
| 1993 | $2,349 | $7,260 | $607 | $3,067 |
| 1992 | $2,127 | $6,869 | $580 | $2,851 |
| 1991 | $2,258 | $6,867 | $546 | $2,713 |
| 1990 | $2,620 | $6,688 | $491 | $2,527 |
| 1989 | $2,819 | - | $430 | - |
| 1988 | $2,141 | - | $434 | - |
| 1987 | $2,006 | - | $420 | - |
| 1986 | $1,854 | - | $407 | - |
| 1985 | $1,556 | - | $385 | - |
| 1984 | $1,420 | - | $391 | - |
| 1983 | $1,461 | - | $336 | - |
| 1982 | $2,138 | - | $312 | - |
| 1981 | $2,080 | - | $292.5 | - |
| 1980 | $1,959 | - | $271.1 | - |
| 1979 | $1,870 | - | $230.8 | - |
| 1978 | $1,733 | - | $191 | - |
| 1977 | $1,562 | - | $292.1 | - |
| 1976 | $1,390 | - | $260.3 | - |
| 1975 | $1,201 | - | $279.8 | - |
| 1974 | $1,045 | - | $268.7 | - |
| 1973 | $815 | - | $220.2 | - |
| 1972 | $583 | - | $199.4 | - |
| 1971 | $500 | - | $188.8 | - |
| 1970 | $444 | - | $186.9 | - |
| 1969 | $399 | - | $163.6 | - |
| 1968 | $374 | - | $153.5 | - |
| 1967 | $351 | - | $162.3 | - |
| 1966 | $328 | - | $156.6 | - |
| 1965 | $268 | - | $155.6 | - |
| 1964 | $257.3 | - | $122.9 | - |
| 1963 | $294.2 | - | $119.4 | - |
| 1962 | $250.2 | - | $141.4 | - |
| 1961 | $231.6 | - | $145.9 | - |
| 1960 | $235.3 | - | $145.9 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
Brazil's GDP per capita is $10,311, ranking 85/197, compared to $4,516 in Sri Lanka, ranking 124/197. Adjusted for purchasing power (GDP per capita PPP), Brazil ranks 88th at $22,338, while Sri Lanka ranks 111th at $15,633.
Economic indicators
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gross domestic product |
$2.19T
2024 |
$99B
2024 |
| GDP rank |
10/197
2024 |
72/197
2024 |
| GDP growth |
3.42%
2023-2024 |
5.01%
2023-2024 |
| GDP per capita |
$10,311
2024 |
$4,516
2024 |
| GDP per capita rank |
85/197
2024 |
124/197
2024 |
| GDP per capita, PPP |
$22,338
2024 |
$15,633
2024 |
| GDP per capita PPP rank |
88/197
2024 |
111/197
2024 |
| Government debt |
$1.91T
2024 |
$99.8B
2024 |
| Debt-to-GDP ratio |
87.3%
2024 |
100.8%
2024 |
| Government debt per person |
$8,999
2024 |
$4,554
2024 |
| Government debt per person rank |
60/185
2024 |
85/185
2024 |
| Average annual personal income after taxes |
$6,263
2026 |
$2,874
2026 |
| Market capitalization of domestic companies |
$659B
2024 |
$19.5B
2024 |
| Number of millionaires |
433,000
2025 |
n/a |
| Number of billionaires |
56
2025 |
n/a |
| Income share by richest 10% |
40.8%
2023 |
30.8%
2019 |
| Income share by poorest 10% |
1.3%
2023 |
3.1%
2019 |
| Government expenditure, % of GDP |
45.7%
2024 |
19.3%
2024 |
| Consumer prices inflation |
4.4%
2023-2024 |
-0.43%
2023-2024 |
| Central bank interest rate |
15%
2025 |
7.75%
2025 |
| Unemployment rate |
6.8%
2024 |
4.67%
2023 |
| Population |
213824938
|
22185425
|
Spending and national debt comparison by year
| Year | % of GDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|||
| Government spending | Government debt | Government spending | Government debt | |
| 2024 | 45.7% | 87.3% | 19.3% | 100.8% |
| 2023 | 45.3% | 84% | 19.5% | 110.4% |
| 2022 | 43.4% | 83.9% | 18.6% | 115.9% |
| 2021 | 40.4% | 88.9% | 20% | 102.7% |
| 2020 | 46.2% | 96% | 22.1% | 96.9% |
| 2019 | 43% | 87.1% | 19.5% | 82.6% |
| 2018 | 44.2% | 84.8% | 17.5% | 83.6% |
| 2017 | 44.3% | 82.7% | 17.9% | 72.3% |
| 2016 | 45.5% | 77.4% | 18.2% | 75% |
| 2015 | 46.2% | 71.7% | 19.3% | 76.3% |
| 2014 | 41.4% | 61.6% | 17.2% | 69.6% |
| 2013 | 39.8% | 59.6% | 16.6% | 69.5% |
| 2012 | 39.3% | 61.6% | 17.3% | 67.5% |
| 2011 | 39.4% | 60.6% | 19.1% | 69.4% |
| 2010 | 39.5% | 62.4% | 19.3% | 68.7% |
| 2009 | 40.5% | 64.7% | 21% | 72.8% |
| 2008 | 39.9% | 61.4% | 19.1% | 68.8% |
| 2007 | 40.4% | 63% | 19.9% | 71.8% |
| 2006 | 42.6% | 64.6% | 20.5% | 74.3% |
| 2005 | 41.9% | 67% | 20.1% | 76.6% |
| 2004 | 39.7% | 68% | 19.3% | 86.5% |
| 2003 | 41.3% | 71.5% | 19.3% | 86.5% |
| 2002 | 44.5% | 76.1% | 20.8% | 96.3% |
| 2001 | 39.8% | 67.3% | 22.4% | 84.4% |
| 2000 | 34.5% | 62.2% | 21.7% | 79.2% |
| 1999 | 39.6% | 44.5% | 20.5% | 77.7% |
| 1998 | 40.9% | 38.9% | 21.4% | 74.2% |
| 1997 | 38.6% | 31.8% | 21.4% | 70.1% |
| 1996 | 38.2% | 30.7% | 23.1% | 76.2% |
| 1995 | - | 28% | 24.8% | 77.8% |
| 1994 | - | 30% | 24.1% | 77.9% |
| 1993 | - | 32.6% | 23.2% | 79.2% |
| 1992 | - | 37.1% | 23% | 77.9% |
| 1991 | - | 38.1% | 26.4% | 80.5% |
| 1990 | - | 40.6% | 25.4% | 78.9% |
| 1989 | - | 40.2% | - | - |
| 1988 | - | 46.9% | - | - |
| 1987 | - | 50.3% | - | - |
| 1986 | 11.7% | 49.4% | - | - |
| 1985 | 11.1% | 52.6% | - | - |
| 1984 | 10% | 55.8% | - | - |
| 1983 | 9.7% | 51.5% | - | - |
| 1982 | 8.1% | 32.8% | - | - |
| 1981 | 7.8% | 34.6% | - | - |
| 1980 | 6.8% | 39.7% | - | - |
| 1979 | 9% | 36.6% | - | - |
| 1978 | 10.2% | 37% | - | - |
| 1977 | 10.4% | 31% | - | - |
| 1976 | 10.6% | 31.8% | - | - |
| 1975 | 10.7% | 27.7% | - | - |
| 1974 | 10.5% | 25.7% | - | - |
| 1973 | 11% | 22.4% | - | - |
| 1972 | 12.6% | 22.5% | - | - |
| 1971 | 11.7% | 17.9% | - | - |
| 1970 | 11.4% | 17% | - | - |
| 1969 | 11.2% | 16.5% | - | - |
| 1968 | 14.4% | 15.8% | - | - |
| 1967 | 13.5% | 13.8% | - | - |
| 1966 | 14.6% | 19.6% | - | - |
| 1965 | 14% | 17.6% | - | - |
| 1964 | 25.4% | 22.2% | - | - |
| 1963 | 22.8% | 20.4% | - | - |
| 1962 | 23.1% | 23.7% | - | - |
| 1961 | 12% | 25.7% | - | - |
| 1960 | 13.7% | 22.3% | - | - |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2024, retrieved 2026-02-20); International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1960–2000, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
In 2024, Brazil's government spending was $998B, accounting for 45.7% of its GDP, while Sri Lanka spent $19.1B, or 19.3% of GDP.
Debt-to-GDP ratio is 87.3% in Brazil and 100.8% in Sri Lanka, ranking 38/185 and 23/185, respectively.
Government deficit by year
| Year | Deficit/surplus, % of GDP | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | -6.19% | -5.64% |
| 2023 | -7.71% | -8.32% |
| 2022 | -3.96% | -10.2% |
| 2021 | -2.63% | -11.7% |
| 2020 | -11.6% | -13.4% |
| 2019 | -4.86% | -7.52% |
| 2018 | -6.99% | -4.96% |
| 2017 | -7.97% | -5.1% |
| 2016 | -7.99% | -5% |
| 2015 | -9.28% | -6.64% |
| 2014 | -6.27% | -5.99% |
| 2013 | -3.42% | -5% |
| 2012 | -2.35% | -5.44% |
| 2011 | -2.74% | -6.01% |
| 2010 | -3.55% | -6.73% |
| 2009 | -4.23% | -8.33% |
| 2008 | -2.39% | -5.93% |
| 2007 | -2.66% | -5.81% |
| 2006 | -4.87% | -5.91% |
| 2005 | -3.36% | -5.93% |
| 2004 | -2.95% | -6.32% |
| 2003 | -5.4% | -6.15% |
| 2002 | -4.15% | -6.9% |
| 2001 | -3.47% | -8.48% |
| 2000 | -3.32% | -7.78% |
| 1999 | -5.17% | -5.58% |
| 1998 | -7.22% | -6.79% |
| 1997 | -5.6% | -5.71% |
| 1996 | -5.35% | -6.89% |
| 1995 | - | -7.11% |
| 1994 | - | -7.41% |
| 1993 | - | -5.77% |
| 1992 | - | -4.95% |
| 1991 | - | -7.97% |
| 1990 | - | -6.39% |
| 1989 | - | - |
| 1988 | - | - |
| 1987 | - | - |
| 1986 | -1.6% | - |
| 1985 | -1.3% | - |
| 1984 | -0.4% | - |
| 1983 | 0.1% | - |
| 1982 | 1.4% | - |
| 1981 | 1% | - |
| 1980 | 2.5% | - |
| 1979 | 0.4% | - |
| 1978 | -0.1% | - |
| 1977 | 0.1% | - |
| 1976 | 0.1% | - |
| 1975 | 0% | - |
| 1974 | 0.6% | - |
| 1973 | 0.1% | - |
| 1972 | -0.1% | - |
| 1971 | -0.3% | - |
| 1970 | -0.4% | - |
| 1969 | -0.6% | - |
| 1968 | -1.6% | - |
| 1967 | -2.1% | - |
| 1966 | -1.3% | - |
| 1965 | -2% | - |
| 1964 | -8.79% | - |
| 1963 | -5.78% | - |
| 1962 | -6.82% | - |
| 1961 | -2.93% | - |
| 1960 | -3.85% | - |
| 1959 | -0.18% | - |
| 1958 | -0.76% | - |
| 1957 | -0.29% | - |
| 1956 | -0.14% | - |
| 1955 | -0.62% | - |
| 1954 | -0.49% | - |
| 1953 | -1.26% | - |
| 1952 | 0.64% | - |
| 1951 | 0.87% | - |
| 1950 | -1.58% | - |
| 1949 | -1.22% | - |
| 1948 | 0.002% | - |
| 1947 | 0.25% | - |
| 1946 | -1.78% | - |
| 1945 | -2.87% | - |
| 1944 | -2.37% | - |
| 1943 | -0.75% | - |
| 1942 | -2.55% | - |
| 1941 | -2.15% | - |
| 1940 | -1.13% | - |
| 1939 | -1.2% | - |
| 1938 | -0.59% | - |
| 1937 | -1.62% | - |
| 1936 | -0.27% | - |
| 1935 | -0.5% | - |
| 1934 | -2.28% | - |
| 1933 | -1.56% | - |
| 1932 | -6.47% | - |
| 1931 | -1.56% | - |
| 1930 | -3.58% | - |
| 1929 | -0.09% | - |
| 1928 | 0.57% | - |
| 1927 | 0.12% | - |
| 1926 | -0.76% | - |
| 1925 | -0.07% | - |
| 1924 | -0.45% | - |
| 1923 | -1.94% | - |
| 1922 | -3.8% | - |
| 1921 | -2.98% | - |
| 1920 | -3.11% | - |
| 1919 | -3.69% | - |
| 1918 | -4.51% | - |
| 1917 | -4.8% | - |
| 1916 | -4.35% | - |
| 1915 | -6.33% | - |
| 1914 | -7.32% | - |
| 1913 | -1.91% | - |
| 1912 | -3.05% | - |
| 1911 | -2.15% | - |
| 1910 | -2.06% | - |
| 1909 | -1.62% | - |
| 1908 | -1.89% | - |
| 1907 | 0.38% | - |
| 1906 | 0.28% | - |
| 1905 | 0.96% | - |
| 1904 | -0.62% | - |
| 1903 | 1.79% | - |
| 1902 | 1.59% | - |
| 1901 | -2.46% | - |
| 1900 | -5.57% | - |
| 1899 | -2.13% | - |
| 1898 | -14% | - |
| 1897 | -2.38% | - |
| 1896 | -0.79% | - |
| 1895 | -1.33% | - |
| 1894 | -4.11% | - |
| 1893 | -1.77% | - |
| 1892 | -2.6% | - |
| 1891 | 0.51% | - |
| 1890 | -3.02% | - |
| 1889 | -3.79% | - |
| 1888 | 0.63% | - |
| 1887 | -0.76% | - |
| 1886 | -3.8% | - |
| 1885 | -5.71% | - |
| 1884 | -3.89% | - |
| 1883 | -3.33% | - |
| 1882 | -1.58% | - |
| 1881 | -1.9% | - |
| 1880 | -4.84% | - |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1880–2000, retrieved 2026-02-20); International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2024, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
In 2024, Brazil's government deficit, the difference between spending and revenue, was $135B, equivalent to 6.19% of GDP. This compares to Sri Lanka's deficit of $5.58B, or 5.64% of GDP.
Over the past 35 years, Brazil recorded a fiscal deficit in 29 of those years, while Sri Lanka ran a deficit in 35 years. On average, Brazil posted an annual deficit equal to 5.09% of GDP, compared to deficit of 6.85% of GDP for Sri Lanka.
Inflation comparison by year
| Year | Consumer prices inflation | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 4.4% | -0.43% |
| 2023 | 4.6% | 16.5% |
| 2022 | 9.3% | 49.7% |
| 2021 | 8.3% | 7.01% |
| 2020 | 3.2% | 6.15% |
| 2019 | 3.7% | 3.53% |
| 2018 | 3.7% | 2.14% |
| 2017 | 3.4% | 7.7% |
| 2016 | 8.7% | 3.96% |
| 2015 | 9% | 3.77% |
| 2014 | 6.3% | 3.18% |
| 2013 | 6.2% | 6.91% |
| 2012 | 5.4% | 7.54% |
| 2011 | 6.6% | 6.72% |
| 2010 | 5% | 6.22% |
| 2009 | 4.9% | 3.46% |
| 2008 | 5.7% | 22.6% |
| 2007 | 3.6% | 15.8% |
| 2006 | 4.2% | 10% |
| 2005 | 6.9% | 11.6% |
| 2004 | 6.6% | 7.58% |
| 2003 | 14.7% | 6.31% |
| 2002 | 8.4% | 9.55% |
| 2001 | 6.8% | 14.2% |
| 2000 | 7% | 6.18% |
| 1999 | 4.9% | 4.69% |
| 1998 | 3.2% | 9.36% |
| 1997 | 6.9% | 9.57% |
Data sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF) | World Economic Outlook (1997–2024, retrieved 2026-02-20); World Bank | Economy & Growth (1997–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
Over the past 28 years, Brazil has recorded an average annual inflation rate of 6.13%, compared with 9.34% in Sri Lanka. In 2024, inflation was 4.4% in Brazil and -0.43% in Sri Lanka.
Top exports between countries
|
Brazil
|
|
|---|---|
| Export category | Export value |
| Processed food, beverages & tobacco | $15M |
| Wood & paper products | $11M |
| Raw materials & minerals | $9.58M |
| Textiles & consumer goods | $2.75M |
| Chemicals & pharma | $2.17M |
| Animal & marine products | $1.03M |
| Machinery & equipment | $708K |
| Metals | $520K |
| Weapons & explosives | $370K |
| Raw agricultural goods | $166K |
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| Export category | Export value |
| Raw materials & minerals | $48.4M |
| Textiles & consumer goods | $29.7M |
| Machinery & equipment | $3.96M |
| Chemicals & pharma | $1.35M |
| Raw agricultural goods | $925K |
| Processed food, beverages & tobacco | $458K |
| Metals | $405K |
| Animal & marine products | $89K |
| Precious metals & jewellery | $55K |
| Wood & paper products | $10K |
Balance of trade
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Current account balance
|
-$66.2B
2024 |
$1.21B
2024 |
| Current account balance ranking |
188/190
2024 |
53/190
2024 |
| Current account balance, % of GDP |
-3.03%
2024 |
+1.22%
2024 |
| Goods imports |
$274B
2024 |
$18.8B
2024 |
| Goods exports |
$340B
2024 |
$12.8B
2024 |
| Service imports |
$103B
2024 |
$3.48B
2024 |
| Service exports |
$48.1B
2024 |
$6.91B
2024 |
| Imports of goods and services, % of GDP |
17.6%
2024 |
22.5%
2024 |
| Exports of goods and services, % of GDP |
17.9%
2024 |
19.9%
2024 |
Economic freedom indices
The indices of economic freedom below are issued by the Heritage Foundation. Higher scores indicate stronger economic health.
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Economic freedom | 52.4 | 50.3 |
| Economic freedom ranking | 148/197 | 162/197 |
| Property rights | 49.2 | 47.3 |
| Government integrity | 37.2 | 37.3 |
| Judicial effectiveness | 55.6 | 47.2 |
| Tax burden | 70.6 | 77 |
| Government spending | 39.8 | 89 |
| Fiscal health | 28 | 0 |
| Business freedom | 65.7 | 60.1 |
| Labor freedom | 57 | 54.3 |
| Monetary freedom | 76 | 65.9 |
| Trade freedom | 69 | 65.6 |
| Investment freedom | 40 | 30 |
| Financial freedom | 40 | 30 |
Economic freedom comparison by year
| Year | Economic freedom index | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2026 | 52.4 | 50.3 |
| 2025 | 55.1 | 49.4 |
| 2024 | 53.2 | 49.2 |
| 2023 | 53.5 | 52.2 |
| 2022 | 53.3 | 53.3 |
| 2021 | 53.4 | 55.7 |
| 2020 | 53.7 | 57.4 |
| 2019 | 51.9 | 56.4 |
| 2018 | 51.4 | 57.8 |
| 2017 | 52.9 | 57.4 |
| 2016 | 56.5 | 59.9 |
| 2015 | 56.6 | 58.6 |
| 2014 | 56.9 | 60 |
| 2013 | 57.7 | 60.7 |
| 2012 | 57.9 | 58.3 |
| 2011 | 56.3 | 57.1 |
| 2010 | 55.6 | 54.6 |
| 2009 | 56.7 | 56 |
| 2008 | 56.2 | 58.4 |
| 2007 | 56.2 | 59.4 |
| 2006 | 60.9 | 58.7 |
| 2005 | 61.7 | 61 |
| 2004 | 62 | 61.6 |
| 2003 | 63.4 | 62.5 |
| 2002 | 61.5 | 64 |
| 2001 | 61.9 | 66 |
| 2000 | 61.1 | 63.2 |
| 1999 | 61.3 | 64 |
| 1998 | 52.3 | 64.6 |
| 1997 | 52.6 | 65.5 |
| 1996 | 48.1 | 62.5 |
| 1995 | 51.4 | 60.6 |
Data sources: The Heritage Foundation | Economic Freedom Index (1995–2026, retrieved 2026-03-09).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
The Economic Freedom Index for Brazil is 52.4, ranking 148/197, compared to 50.3 for Sri Lanka, ranking 162/197. The chart above displays a comparison of annual changes in economic freedom indexes.
Other economic metrics
|
Brazil
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Services, % of GDP |
59.2%
2024 |
57.5%
2024 |
| Industry, % of GDP |
20.9%
2024 |
25.5%
2024 |
| Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, % of GDP |
5.75%
2024 |
8.3%
2024 |
|
GNI, Atlas method
|
$2.11T
2024 |
$84.6B
2024 |
| GNI per capita, PPP |
$21,590
2024 |
$15,240
2024 |
| Total reserves including gold |
$330B
2024 |
$6.09B
2024 |
| Total reserves ranking |
11/177
2024 |
92/177
2024 |
|
Net foreign direct investment
|
-$47.8B
2024 |
-$651M
2024 |
|
Net inflows of foreign direct investment
|
$74.1B
2024 |
$761M
2024 |
|
Net outflows of foreign direct investment
|
$26.3B
2024 |
$110M
2024 |
|
Servicing debt to the IMF, % of GNI
|
5.4%
2024 |
4.98%
2024 |
| Poverty at national poverty lines |
4.2%
2020 |
14.3%
2019 |
|
Gross capital formation, % of GDP
|
17%
2024 |
27%
2024 |
GDP per capita map
Data sources: World Bank | Economy & Growth (1985–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06); U.S. Census Bureau (1985–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08).
GeoRank.org/economy/brazil/sri-lanka | CC BY
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Economy & Growth (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Public Finances in Modern History (1880–2000, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Fiscal Monitor (1990–2024, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- The Heritage Foundation | Economic Freedom Index (1995–2026, retrieved 2026-03-09)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1985–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- TradeMap (2022–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- LivingCost (2026, retrieved 2025-10-14)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2020, retrieved 2026-02-20)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.
The current account balance is the sum of net trade in goods and services, net earnings from cross-border investments, and net transfer payments. It reflects a country's economic transactions with the rest of the world and is a fundamental component of the balance of payments. A surplus indicates that a country exports more than it imports, while a deficit shows the opposite.
Gross National Income (GNI) measures a country's total income. It encompasses income earned by residents, businesses, and foreign sources, defined as employee compensation and investment profits. GNI adds product taxes not included elsewhere and subtracts subsidies. It accounts for income from residents working abroad but excludes earnings from foreigners within the country.
A negative value for Net Foreign Direct Investment indicates a country is a net receiver of investments, as foreign inflows exceed outflows after Balance of Payments adjustments. A positive value indicates a net provider, with outflows exceeding inflows. Inflows are credits (increasing foreign claims on domestic assets), while outflows are debits (increasing domestic assets abroad).
Foreign direct investment (FDI, net inflows) shows how much capital foreign investors bring into a country after accounting for any funds that flow back in the opposite direction. It represents the net value of overseas companies establishing, expanding, or financing businesses in the reporting country. A positive number means more capital entered the country than was withdrawn, while a negative number means foreign investors pulled out more than they invested.
Foreign direct investment (FDI, net outflows) shows how much capital residents of a country invest abroad after accounting for any funds that flow back in the opposite direction. It represents the net value of domestic companies establishing, expanding, or financing businesses in other countries. A positive number means more capital was invested abroad than withdrawn, while a negative number means residents pulled back more than they invested.
Principal and interest payments to the IMF in currency, goods, or services on long-term debt expressed as a share of GNI.
Formerly gross domestic investment, gross capital formation measures the share of a country’s economic output invested in fixed assets, including buildings, machinery, and infrastructure. It indicates how much of the economy is devoted to building productive capacity.