The latest officially reported population of Latvia was 1,862,441 in 2024 vs 634,431 people in Suriname in 2024. In 2025, based on the adjusted UN estimation, the current Latvia's population is 1,844,219 people compared to 644,193 in Suriname.
Population statistics:
- Latvia's population is 2.86 times bigger than Suriname's.
- Latvia is ranked the 149th most populous country in the world, while Suriname is the 165th.
- The countries together account for 0.03% of the world: 0.02% for Latvia vs 0.008% for Suriname.
- For the last 10 years, Latvia has had an average growth rate of -0.7% per year vs +0.99% in Suriname.
- Since 2005, the population of Latvia has decreased from 2.24M people to 1.84M (17.6% decline), while Suriname has grown from 519K to 644K (24% growth).
- Suriname is projected to reach its peak in 2071 at 753K people, while Latvia's population already peaked in 1989 at 2.67M people and is projected to decrease to 921K people by 2100.
Latvia vs Suriname: live population counter
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current population |
1844219
|
644193
|
| Population rank | 149/197 | 165/197 |
| Percent of world population | 0.02% | 0.008% |
| One net population change |
35 minutes
|
1.58 hours
|
| One birth every |
36.4 minutes
|
48.3 minutes
|
| One death every |
18.8 minutes
|
2.1 hours
|
| One migration net change every |
3.94 hours
|
7.51 hours
|
| Annual migration change | -2,225 | -1,166 |
| Daily growth/decline | -41 | +15 |
| Annual growth/decline | -15,004 | +5,545 |
| Annual growth/decline rate | -0.8% | +0.88% |
| Population growth rate rank | 190/197 | 110/197 |
Latvia and Suriname: population history and growth rate by year chart
| Year | Population | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 2,120,979 | 263,918 | - | - |
| 1961 | 2,152,681 | 272,791 | 1.49% | 3.36% |
| 1962 | 2,181,586 | 283,912 | 1.34% | 4.08% |
| 1963 | 2,210,919 | 297,034 | 1.34% | 4.62% |
| 1964 | 2,240,623 | 309,041 | 1.34% | 4.04% |
| 1965 | 2,265,919 | 320,000 | 1.13% | 3.55% |
| 1966 | 2,283,217 | 331,135 | 0.76% | 3.48% |
| 1967 | 2,301,220 | 342,679 | 0.79% | 3.49% |
| 1968 | 2,323,619 | 354,616 | 0.97% | 3.48% |
| 1969 | 2,343,173 | 366,906 | 0.84% | 3.47% |
| 1970 | 2,359,164 | 379,442 | 0.68% | 3.42% |
| 1971 | 2,376,389 | 391,932 | 0.73% | 3.29% |
| 1972 | 2,395,674 | 397,413 | 0.81% | 1.4% |
| 1973 | 2,415,819 | 395,772 | 0.84% | -0.41% |
| 1974 | 2,437,186 | 393,676 | 0.88% | -0.53% |
| 1975 | 2,456,130 | 391,170 | 0.78% | -0.64% |
| 1976 | 2,470,989 | 388,289 | 0.6% | -0.74% |
| 1977 | 2,485,073 | 385,067 | 0.57% | -0.83% |
| 1978 | 2,497,921 | 381,502 | 0.52% | -0.93% |
| 1979 | 2,505,953 | 377,602 | 0.32% | -1.02% |
| 1980 | 2,511,701 | 375,377 | 0.23% | -0.59% |
| 1981 | 2,519,421 | 375,459 | 0.31% | 0.02% |
| 1982 | 2,531,080 | 376,555 | 0.46% | 0.29% |
| 1983 | 2,546,011 | 378,746 | 0.59% | 0.58% |
| 1984 | 2,562,047 | 382,193 | 0.63% | 0.91% |
| 1985 | 2,578,873 | 386,972 | 0.66% | 1.25% |
| 1986 | 2,599,892 | 392,330 | 0.82% | 1.38% |
| 1987 | 2,626,583 | 396,911 | 1.03% | 1.17% |
| 1988 | 2,653,434 | 402,227 | 1.02% | 1.34% |
| 1989 | 2,666,955 | 408,409 | 0.51% | 1.54% |
| 1990 | 2,663,151 | 412,493 | -0.14% | 1% |
| 1991 | 2,650,581 | 415,013 | -0.47% | 0.61% |
| 1992 | 2,614,338 | 417,589 | -1.37% | 0.62% |
| 1993 | 2,563,290 | 419,352 | -1.95% | 0.42% |
| 1994 | 2,520,742 | 422,375 | -1.66% | 0.72% |
| 1995 | 2,485,056 | 429,606 | -1.42% | 1.71% |
| 1996 | 2,457,222 | 438,830 | -1.12% | 2.15% |
| 1997 | 2,432,851 | 448,067 | -0.99% | 2.1% |
| 1998 | 2,410,019 | 457,406 | -0.94% | 2.08% |
| 1999 | 2,390,482 | 466,916 | -0.81% | 2.08% |
| 2000 | 2,367,550 | 476,643 | -0.96% | 2.08% |
| 2001 | 2,337,170 | 486,560 | -1.28% | 2.08% |
| 2002 | 2,310,173 | 496,551 | -1.16% | 2.05% |
| 2003 | 2,287,955 | 506,414 | -0.96% | 1.99% |
| 2004 | 2,263,122 | 513,923 | -1.09% | 1.48% |
| 2005 | 2,238,799 | 519,313 | -1.07% | 1.05% |
| 2006 | 2,218,357 | 524,997 | -0.91% | 1.09% |
| 2007 | 2,200,325 | 531,016 | -0.81% | 1.15% |
| 2008 | 2,177,322 | 537,245 | -1.05% | 1.17% |
| 2009 | 2,141,669 | 543,568 | -1.64% | 1.18% |
| 2010 | 2,097,555 | 549,923 | -2.06% | 1.17% |
| 2011 | 2,059,709 | 556,269 | -1.8% | 1.15% |
| 2012 | 2,034,319 | 562,633 | -1.23% | 1.14% |
| 2013 | 2,012,647 | 569,020 | -1.07% | 1.14% |
| 2014 | 1,993,782 | 575,373 | -0.94% | 1.12% |
| 2015 | 1,977,527 | 581,627 | -0.82% | 1.09% |
| 2016 | 1,959,537 | 587,757 | -0.91% | 1.05% |
| 2017 | 1,942,248 | 593,713 | -0.88% | 1.01% |
| 2018 | 1,927,174 | 599,513 | -0.78% | 0.98% |
| 2019 | 1,913,822 | 605,768 | -0.69% | 1.04% |
| 2020 | 1,900,449 | 612,317 | -0.7% | 1.08% |
| 2021 | 1,884,490 | 617,896 | -0.84% | 0.91% |
| 2022 | 1,879,383 | 623,164 | -0.27% | 0.85% |
| 2023 | 1,877,445 | 628,886 | -0.1% | 0.92% |
| 2024 | 1,862,441 | 634,431 | -0.8% | 0.88% |
| 2025 | 1,844,219 | 639,852 | -0.98% | 0.85% |
| 2026 | 1,826,681 | 645,257 | -0.95% | 0.84% |
| 2027 | 1,812,384 | 650,564 | -0.78% | 0.82% |
| 2028 | 1,797,965 | 655,783 | -0.8% | 0.8% |
| 2029 | 1,783,455 | 660,793 | -0.81% | 0.76% |
| 2030 | 1,768,667 | 665,650 | -0.83% | 0.74% |
| 2031 | 1,753,985 | 670,421 | -0.83% | 0.72% |
| 2032 | 1,739,582 | 675,070 | -0.82% | 0.69% |
| 2033 | 1,725,261 | 679,573 | -0.82% | 0.67% |
| 2034 | 1,711,332 | 683,911 | -0.81% | 0.64% |
| 2035 | 1,697,827 | 688,189 | -0.79% | 0.63% |
| 2036 | 1,684,492 | 692,343 | -0.79% | 0.6% |
| 2037 | 1,671,323 | 696,213 | -0.78% | 0.56% |
| 2038 | 1,658,336 | 699,908 | -0.78% | 0.53% |
| 2039 | 1,645,282 | 703,569 | -0.79% | 0.52% |
| 2040 | 1,632,376 | 707,156 | -0.78% | 0.51% |
| 2041 | 1,619,616 | 710,619 | -0.78% | 0.49% |
| 2042 | 1,607,019 | 713,900 | -0.78% | 0.46% |
| 2043 | 1,594,558 | 716,999 | -0.78% | 0.43% |
| 2044 | 1,582,077 | 719,920 | -0.78% | 0.41% |
| 2045 | 1,569,454 | 722,759 | -0.8% | 0.39% |
| 2046 | 1,556,840 | 725,322 | -0.8% | 0.35% |
| 2047 | 1,544,315 | 727,726 | -0.8% | 0.33% |
| 2048 | 1,531,684 | 730,038 | -0.82% | 0.32% |
| 2049 | 1,518,941 | 732,021 | -0.83% | 0.27% |
| 2050 | 1,506,179 | 733,898 | -0.84% | 0.26% |
From 2005 to 2015, the population of Latvia decreased by 261,272 people (a 11.7% decline), while Suriname gained 62,314 people (a 12% growth).
For the next 10 years, from 2015 to 2025, Latvia lost -133,308 (a 6.74% decline), while Suriname's population increased by 62,566 (a 10.8% growth).
Latvia was ranked 139th most populous country in 2005 and is 149th in 2025. Suriname was ranked 164th in 2005 and ranked 165th now.
The UN's World Population Prospects forecasts that with changing growth rate trends in 25 years (in 2050) Latvia's population will shrink by 18.3% to 1,506,179 people with a rank change from 149th to 153rd. The population of Suriname will increase by 13.9% to 733,898 people and will still be ranked 165th.
Biggest cities by population
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Riga | 605K |
| Daugavpils | 77.8K |
| Liepaja | 66.7K |
| Jelgava | 54.7K |
| Jurmala | 52.2K |
| Ventspils | 32.6K |
| Rezekne | 26.1K |
| Ogre | 22.8K |
| Valmiera | 22.4K |
| Jekabpils | 21.2K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Paramaribo | 224K |
| Nieuw Nickerie | 12.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population differences between Latvia and Suriname
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy | 76.5 years | 73.9 years |
| Average age | 43.6 years | 32.3 years |
| Median age | 44.3 years | 29.4 years |
| Male:Female ratio | 46.4:53.6 | 50:50 |
| Fertility rate | 1.36 births per woman | 2.25 births per woman |
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
Population map with other countries
Population
Growth rate visualization in other countries
Growth rate
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population comparisons