The latest officially reported population of Curacao was 155,967 in 2024 vs 1,866,124 people in Latvia in 2024. In 2026, based on the adjusted UN estimation, the current Curacao's population is 155,945 people compared to 1,830,293 in Latvia.
Population statistics:
- Latvia's population is 11.7 times bigger than Curacao's.
- Curacao is ranked the 179th most populous country in the world, while Latvia is the 149th.
- The countries together account for 0.02% of the world: 0.002% for Curacao vs 0.02% for Latvia.
- For the last 10 years, Curacao has had an average growth rate of +0.13% per year vs -0.68% in Latvia.
- Since 2006, the population of Curacao has increased from 141K people to 156K (10.4% growth), while Latvia has declined from 2.22M to 1.83M (17.5% decline).
- Both countries are in a period of decline and in 50 years are projected to lose 19.7% of the population in Curacao and 36.3% in Latvia.
Curacao vs Latvia: live population counter
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current population |
155945
|
1830293
|
| Population rank | 179/197 | 149/197 |
| Percent of world population | 0.002% | 0.02% |
| One net population change |
6.67 hours
|
29.9 minutes
|
| One birth every |
7.56 hours
|
36.2 minutes
|
| One death every |
5.84 hours
|
18.7 minutes
|
| One migration net change every |
17.1 hours
|
3.94 hours
|
| Annual migration change | +513 | -2,225 |
| Daily growth/decline | +4 | -48 |
| Annual growth/decline | +1,313 | -17,586 |
| Annual growth/decline rate | +0.85% | -0.93% |
| Population growth rate rank | 113/197 | 193/197 |
Curacao and Latvia: population history and growth rate by year chart
| Year | Population | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 124,826 | 2,120,979 | - | - |
| 1961 | 126,125 | 2,152,681 | 1.04% | 1.49% |
| 1962 | 128,414 | 2,181,586 | 1.81% | 1.34% |
| 1963 | 130,860 | 2,210,919 | 1.9% | 1.34% |
| 1964 | 133,148 | 2,240,623 | 1.75% | 1.34% |
| 1965 | 135,266 | 2,265,919 | 1.59% | 1.13% |
| 1966 | 136,682 | 2,283,217 | 1.05% | 0.76% |
| 1967 | 138,140 | 2,301,220 | 1.07% | 0.79% |
| 1968 | 140,298 | 2,323,619 | 1.56% | 0.97% |
| 1969 | 142,581 | 2,343,173 | 1.63% | 0.84% |
| 1970 | 144,739 | 2,359,164 | 1.51% | 0.68% |
| 1971 | 147,389 | 2,376,389 | 1.83% | 0.73% |
| 1972 | 147,710 | 2,395,674 | 0.22% | 0.81% |
| 1973 | 146,912 | 2,415,819 | -0.54% | 0.84% |
| 1974 | 148,351 | 2,437,186 | 0.98% | 0.88% |
| 1975 | 149,129 | 2,456,130 | 0.52% | 0.78% |
| 1976 | 149,399 | 2,470,989 | 0.18% | 0.6% |
| 1977 | 149,459 | 2,485,073 | 0.04% | 0.57% |
| 1978 | 148,341 | 2,497,921 | -0.75% | 0.52% |
| 1979 | 147,851 | 2,505,953 | -0.33% | 0.32% |
| 1980 | 148,041 | 2,511,701 | 0.13% | 0.23% |
| 1981 | 148,629 | 2,519,421 | 0.4% | 0.31% |
| 1982 | 150,101 | 2,531,080 | 0.99% | 0.46% |
| 1983 | 151,159 | 2,546,011 | 0.7% | 0.59% |
| 1984 | 151,940 | 2,562,047 | 0.52% | 0.63% |
| 1985 | 152,711 | 2,578,873 | 0.51% | 0.66% |
| 1986 | 152,662 | 2,599,892 | -0.03% | 0.82% |
| 1987 | 151,456 | 2,626,583 | -0.79% | 1.03% |
| 1988 | 149,254 | 2,653,434 | -1.45% | 1.02% |
| 1989 | 146,937 | 2,666,955 | -1.55% | 0.51% |
| 1990 | 145,400 | 2,663,151 | -1.05% | -0.14% |
| 1991 | 144,403 | 2,650,581 | -0.69% | -0.47% |
| 1992 | 143,912 | 2,614,338 | -0.34% | -1.37% |
| 1993 | 144,299 | 2,563,290 | 0.27% | -1.95% |
| 1994 | 144,630 | 2,520,742 | 0.23% | -1.66% |
| 1995 | 145,139 | 2,485,056 | 0.35% | -1.42% |
| 1996 | 146,306 | 2,457,222 | 0.8% | -1.12% |
| 1997 | 146,956 | 2,432,851 | 0.44% | -0.99% |
| 1998 | 144,472 | 2,410,019 | -1.69% | -0.94% |
| 1999 | 139,428 | 2,390,482 | -3.49% | -0.81% |
| 2000 | 133,860 | 2,367,550 | -3.99% | -0.96% |
| 2001 | 129,047 | 2,337,170 | -3.6% | -1.28% |
| 2002 | 129,205 | 2,310,173 | 0.12% | -1.16% |
| 2003 | 131,897 | 2,287,955 | 2.08% | -0.96% |
| 2004 | 134,192 | 2,263,122 | 1.74% | -1.09% |
| 2005 | 137,658 | 2,238,799 | 2.58% | -1.07% |
| 2006 | 141,239 | 2,218,357 | 2.6% | -0.91% |
| 2007 | 144,056 | 2,200,325 | 1.99% | -0.81% |
| 2008 | 145,880 | 2,177,322 | 1.27% | -1.05% |
| 2009 | 146,833 | 2,141,669 | 0.65% | -1.64% |
| 2010 | 148,703 | 2,097,555 | 1.27% | -2.06% |
| 2011 | 150,831 | 2,059,709 | 1.43% | -1.8% |
| 2012 | 152,088 | 2,034,319 | 0.83% | -1.23% |
| 2013 | 153,822 | 2,012,647 | 1.14% | -1.07% |
| 2014 | 155,909 | 1,993,782 | 1.36% | -0.94% |
| 2015 | 157,980 | 1,977,527 | 1.33% | -0.82% |
| 2016 | 159,664 | 1,959,537 | 1.07% | -0.91% |
| 2017 | 160,175 | 1,942,248 | 0.32% | -0.88% |
| 2018 | 159,336 | 1,927,174 | -0.52% | -0.78% |
| 2019 | 157,441 | 1,913,822 | -1.19% | -0.69% |
| 2020 | 155,482 | 1,900,449 | -1.24% | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 153,948 | 1,884,490 | -0.99% | -0.84% |
| 2022 | 153,321 | 1,879,383 | -0.41% | -0.27% |
| 2023 | 154,654 | 1,883,710 | 0.87% | 0.23% |
| 2024 | 155,967 | 1,866,124 | 0.85% | -0.93% |
| 2025 | 155,977 | 1,847,866 | 0.007% | -0.98% |
| 2026 | 155,945 | 1,830,293 | -0.02% | -0.95% |
| 2027 | 155,873 | 1,815,968 | -0.05% | -0.78% |
| 2028 | 155,776 | 1,801,521 | -0.06% | -0.8% |
| 2029 | 155,625 | 1,786,981 | -0.1% | -0.81% |
| 2030 | 155,422 | 1,772,165 | -0.13% | -0.83% |
| 2031 | 155,179 | 1,757,453 | -0.16% | -0.83% |
| 2032 | 154,912 | 1,743,022 | -0.17% | -0.82% |
| 2033 | 154,613 | 1,728,673 | -0.19% | -0.82% |
| 2034 | 154,266 | 1,714,716 | -0.22% | -0.81% |
| 2035 | 153,910 | 1,701,185 | -0.23% | -0.79% |
| 2036 | 153,509 | 1,687,823 | -0.26% | -0.79% |
| 2037 | 153,094 | 1,674,629 | -0.27% | -0.78% |
| 2038 | 152,666 | 1,661,616 | -0.28% | -0.78% |
| 2039 | 152,205 | 1,648,536 | -0.3% | -0.79% |
| 2040 | 151,700 | 1,635,604 | -0.33% | -0.78% |
| 2041 | 151,195 | 1,622,819 | -0.33% | -0.78% |
| 2042 | 150,673 | 1,610,197 | -0.35% | -0.78% |
| 2043 | 150,136 | 1,597,712 | -0.36% | -0.78% |
| 2044 | 149,583 | 1,585,205 | -0.37% | -0.78% |
| 2045 | 149,005 | 1,572,558 | -0.39% | -0.8% |
| 2046 | 148,431 | 1,559,919 | -0.39% | -0.8% |
| 2047 | 147,827 | 1,547,369 | -0.41% | -0.8% |
| 2048 | 147,194 | 1,534,713 | -0.43% | -0.82% |
| 2049 | 146,558 | 1,521,945 | -0.43% | -0.83% |
| 2050 | 145,892 | 1,509,157 | -0.45% | -0.84% |
From 2006 to 2016, the population of Curacao increased by 18,425 people (a 13% growth), while Latvia lost 258,820 people (a 11.7% decline).
For the next 10 years, from 2016 to 2026, Curacao lost -3,719 (a 2.33% decline), while Latvia's population decreased by -129,244 (a 6.6% decline).
Curacao was ranked 179th most populous country in 2006 and is still 179th in 2026. Latvia was ranked 140th in 2006 and ranked 149th now.
The UN's World Population Prospects forecasts that with changing growth rate trends in 24 years (in 2050) Curacao's population will shrink by 6.45% to 145,892 people with a rank change from 179th to 180th. The population of Latvia will decrease by 17.5% to 1,509,157 people and rank change from 149th to 153rd.
Biggest cities by population
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population differences between Curacao and Latvia
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy | 77.3 years | 76.6 years |
| Average age | 40.8 years | 43.6 years |
| Median age | 39.5 years | 44.3 years |
| Male:Female ratio | 47.6:52.4 | 46.4:53.6 |
| Fertility rate | 1.2 births per woman | 1.36 births per woman |
| Population density | 910 ppl/mi² | 77.7 ppl/mi² |
Population map with other countries
Population
Growth rate visualization in other countries
Growth rate
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population comparisons