Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and Suriname are ranked 155th and 193rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in Latvia is 657% higher than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
Latvia
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 193/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
644193
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 33.5% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 66.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Latvia vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 23.4% growth in Suriname.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. Suriname was 186th in 2004 and ranks 193rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 83 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | - | 6.7 |
| 1990 | - | 6.66 |
| 1989 | - | 6.59 |
| 1988 | - | 6.49 |
| 1987 | - | 6.4 |
| 1986 | - | 6.33 |
| 1985 | - | 6.24 |
| 1984 | - | 6.17 |
| 1983 | - | 6.11 |
| 1982 | - | 6.08 |
| 1981 | - | 6.06 |
| 1980 | - | 6.06 |
| 1979 | - | 6.09 |
| 1978 | - | 6.16 |
| 1977 | - | 6.21 |
| 1976 | - | 6.27 |
| 1975 | - | 6.31 |
| 1974 | - | 6.35 |
| 1973 | - | 6.39 |
| 1972 | - | 6.41 |
| 1971 | - | 6.32 |
| 1970 | - | 6.12 |
| 1969 | - | 5.92 |
| 1968 | - | 5.72 |
| 1967 | - | 5.53 |
| 1966 | - | 5.34 |
| 1965 | - | 5.16 |
| 1964 | - | 4.99 |
| 1963 | - | 4.79 |
| 1962 | - | 4.58 |
| 1961 | - | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 66.5% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 66.4% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 66.3% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 66.2% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 66.1% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 66.1% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 66% |
| 2016 | 68% | 66% |
| 2015 | 68% | 66.1% |
| 2014 | 68% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 66.1% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 66.3% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | 68% | 66.6% |
| 2005 | 68% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 66.6% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 66.5% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 66.4% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 66.4% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 66.3% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 66.2% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 66.1% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 66.1% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 66% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 65.9% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 65.9% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 65.7% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 65.4% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 65.3% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 65.3% |
| 1983 | 68% | 65.2% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 65.1% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 65% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 65% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 62.8% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 60.6% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 58.3% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 56.1% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 53.7% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 51.4% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 49.1% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 46.8% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 45.7% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 45.9% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 46.4% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 46.6% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 46.9% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 56% | 47.3% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 47.4% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 47.3% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 47.3% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 47.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
