The latest officially reported population of Eswatini was 1,242,822 in 2024 vs 21,314,956 people in Zambia in 2024. In 2025, based on the adjusted UN estimation, the current Eswatini's population is 1,267,161 people compared to 22,402,291 in Zambia.
Population statistics:
- Zambia's population is 17.7 times bigger than Eswatini's.
- Eswatini is ranked the 156th most populous country in the world, while Zambia is the 62nd.
- The countries together account for 0.29% of the world: 0.02% for Eswatini vs 0.27% for Zambia.
- For the last 10 years, Eswatini has had an average growth rate of +0.87% per year vs +3% in Zambia.
- Since 2005, the population of Eswatini has increased from 1.08M people to 1.27M (17.4% growth), while Zambia has grown from 11.7M to 22.4M (91.2% growth).
- Eswatini is projected to reach its peak in 2063 at 1.54M people compared to the peak of 64.5M people in 2100 for Zambia.
Eswatini vs Zambia: live population counter
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current population |
1267161
|
22402291
|
| Population rank | 156/197 | 62/197 |
| Percent of world population | 0.02% | 0.27% |
| One net population change |
42.7 minutes
|
53.4 seconds
|
| One birth every |
17.7 minutes
|
46 seconds
|
| One death every |
55.5 minutes
|
4.87 minutes
|
| One migration net change every |
1.3 hours
|
1.19 hours
|
| Annual migration change | -6,754 | +7,381 |
| Daily growth/decline | +34 | +1,619 |
| Annual growth/decline | +12,316 | +590,991 |
| Annual growth/decline rate | +1% | +2.85% |
| Population growth rate rank | 102/197 | 22/197 |
Eswatini and Zambia: population history and growth rate by year chart
| Year | Population | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 345,337 | 3,153,729 | - | - |
| 1961 | 353,264 | 3,254,086 | 2.3% | 3.18% |
| 1962 | 361,365 | 3,358,099 | 2.29% | 3.2% |
| 1963 | 369,759 | 3,465,907 | 2.32% | 3.21% |
| 1964 | 378,656 | 3,577,017 | 2.41% | 3.21% |
| 1965 | 388,336 | 3,692,086 | 2.56% | 3.22% |
| 1966 | 398,766 | 3,812,003 | 2.69% | 3.25% |
| 1967 | 409,031 | 3,936,343 | 2.57% | 3.26% |
| 1968 | 419,147 | 4,065,593 | 2.47% | 3.28% |
| 1969 | 429,875 | 4,197,116 | 2.56% | 3.24% |
| 1970 | 441,216 | 4,321,718 | 2.64% | 2.97% |
| 1971 | 453,183 | 4,442,525 | 2.71% | 2.8% |
| 1972 | 465,788 | 4,569,309 | 2.78% | 2.85% |
| 1973 | 479,038 | 4,702,693 | 2.84% | 2.92% |
| 1974 | 492,988 | 4,842,746 | 2.91% | 2.98% |
| 1975 | 507,673 | 4,990,086 | 2.98% | 3.04% |
| 1976 | 523,330 | 5,143,842 | 3.08% | 3.08% |
| 1977 | 540,348 | 5,302,480 | 3.25% | 3.08% |
| 1978 | 558,446 | 5,465,374 | 3.35% | 3.07% |
| 1979 | 577,199 | 5,631,728 | 3.36% | 3.04% |
| 1980 | 596,644 | 5,802,833 | 3.37% | 3.04% |
| 1981 | 616,808 | 5,983,289 | 3.38% | 3.11% |
| 1982 | 637,652 | 6,178,637 | 3.38% | 3.26% |
| 1983 | 658,957 | 6,381,038 | 3.34% | 3.28% |
| 1984 | 680,783 | 6,580,490 | 3.31% | 3.13% |
| 1985 | 706,196 | 6,780,953 | 3.73% | 3.05% |
| 1986 | 734,732 | 6,986,471 | 4.04% | 3.03% |
| 1987 | 763,811 | 7,191,282 | 3.96% | 2.93% |
| 1988 | 799,798 | 7,391,440 | 4.71% | 2.78% |
| 1989 | 837,800 | 7,589,216 | 4.75% | 2.68% |
| 1990 | 872,428 | 7,786,169 | 4.13% | 2.6% |
| 1991 | 908,189 | 7,981,650 | 4.1% | 2.51% |
| 1992 | 943,416 | 8,176,680 | 3.88% | 2.44% |
| 1993 | 971,318 | 8,373,921 | 2.96% | 2.41% |
| 1994 | 971,212 | 8,576,269 | -0.01% | 2.42% |
| 1995 | 970,433 | 8,785,763 | -0.08% | 2.44% |
| 1996 | 989,841 | 9,004,053 | 2% | 2.48% |
| 1997 | 1,006,635 | 9,237,063 | 1.7% | 2.59% |
| 1998 | 1,019,653 | 9,482,408 | 1.29% | 2.66% |
| 1999 | 1,030,782 | 9,740,005 | 1.09% | 2.72% |
| 2000 | 1,041,414 | 10,017,631 | 1.03% | 2.85% |
| 2001 | 1,051,064 | 10,325,185 | 0.93% | 3.07% |
| 2002 | 1,059,441 | 10,647,949 | 0.8% | 3.13% |
| 2003 | 1,066,700 | 10,983,595 | 0.69% | 3.15% |
| 2004 | 1,073,159 | 11,338,198 | 0.61% | 3.23% |
| 2005 | 1,079,022 | 11,718,819 | 0.55% | 3.36% |
| 2006 | 1,084,436 | 12,129,553 | 0.5% | 3.5% |
| 2007 | 1,090,705 | 12,565,085 | 0.58% | 3.59% |
| 2008 | 1,098,091 | 13,021,324 | 0.68% | 3.63% |
| 2009 | 1,105,153 | 13,490,389 | 0.64% | 3.6% |
| 2010 | 1,111,650 | 13,965,594 | 0.59% | 3.52% |
| 2011 | 1,117,833 | 14,437,796 | 0.56% | 3.38% |
| 2012 | 1,123,863 | 14,913,629 | 0.54% | 3.3% |
| 2013 | 1,129,990 | 15,398,997 | 0.55% | 3.25% |
| 2014 | 1,136,299 | 15,895,315 | 0.56% | 3.22% |
| 2015 | 1,142,813 | 16,399,089 | 0.57% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 1,149,507 | 16,914,423 | 0.59% | 3.14% |
| 2017 | 1,158,195 | 17,441,320 | 0.76% | 3.12% |
| 2018 | 1,168,929 | 17,973,569 | 0.93% | 3.05% |
| 2019 | 1,179,874 | 18,513,839 | 0.94% | 3.01% |
| 2020 | 1,192,729 | 19,059,395 | 1.09% | 2.95% |
| 2021 | 1,206,593 | 19,603,607 | 1.16% | 2.86% |
| 2022 | 1,218,917 | 20,152,938 | 1.02% | 2.8% |
| 2023 | 1,230,506 | 20,723,965 | 0.95% | 2.83% |
| 2024 | 1,242,822 | 21,314,956 | 1% | 2.85% |
| 2025 | 1,256,168 | 21,913,869 | 1.07% | 2.81% |
| 2026 | 1,269,854 | 22,521,905 | 1.09% | 2.77% |
| 2027 | 1,283,222 | 23,138,716 | 1.05% | 2.74% |
| 2028 | 1,295,964 | 23,761,368 | 0.99% | 2.69% |
| 2029 | 1,308,342 | 24,389,681 | 0.96% | 2.64% |
| 2030 | 1,320,904 | 25,024,887 | 0.96% | 2.6% |
| 2031 | 1,333,159 | 25,666,496 | 0.93% | 2.56% |
| 2032 | 1,344,893 | 26,311,946 | 0.88% | 2.51% |
| 2033 | 1,356,736 | 26,960,073 | 0.88% | 2.46% |
| 2034 | 1,368,346 | 27,611,621 | 0.86% | 2.42% |
| 2035 | 1,379,413 | 28,266,887 | 0.81% | 2.37% |
| 2036 | 1,390,148 | 28,925,103 | 0.78% | 2.33% |
| 2037 | 1,400,439 | 29,583,482 | 0.74% | 2.28% |
| 2038 | 1,410,496 | 30,240,549 | 0.72% | 2.22% |
| 2039 | 1,420,444 | 30,895,586 | 0.71% | 2.17% |
| 2040 | 1,429,771 | 31,550,394 | 0.66% | 2.12% |
| 2041 | 1,439,042 | 32,204,340 | 0.65% | 2.07% |
| 2042 | 1,448,106 | 32,856,596 | 0.63% | 2.03% |
| 2043 | 1,456,448 | 33,510,500 | 0.58% | 1.99% |
| 2044 | 1,464,359 | 34,165,920 | 0.54% | 1.96% |
| 2045 | 1,472,135 | 34,821,101 | 0.53% | 1.92% |
| 2046 | 1,479,603 | 35,475,795 | 0.51% | 1.88% |
| 2047 | 1,486,494 | 36,129,270 | 0.47% | 1.84% |
| 2048 | 1,493,017 | 36,782,260 | 0.44% | 1.81% |
| 2049 | 1,499,424 | 37,434,667 | 0.43% | 1.77% |
| 2050 | 1,505,327 | 38,083,369 | 0.39% | 1.73% |
From 2005 to 2015, the population of Eswatini increased by 63,791 people (a 5.91% growth), while Zambia gained 4,680,270 people (a 39.9% growth).
For the next 10 years, from 2015 to 2025, Eswatini gained 124,348 (a 10.9% growth), while Zambia's population increased by 6,003,202 (a 36.6% growth).
Eswatini was ranked 152nd most populous country in 2005 and is 156th in 2025. Zambia was ranked 71st in 2005 and ranked 62nd now.
The UN's World Population Prospects forecasts that with changing growth rate trends in 25 years (in 2050) Eswatini's population will grow by 18.8% to 1,505,327 people with a rank change from 156th to 154th. The population of Zambia will increase by 70% to 38,083,369 people and rank change from 62nd to 53rd.
Biggest cities by population
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population differences between Eswatini and Zambia
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy | 64.4 years | 66.7 years |
| Average age | 26.5 years | 22.6 years |
| Median age | 23.2 years | 18.8 years |
| Male:Female ratio | 49.1:50.9 | 49.5:50.5 |
| Fertility rate | 2.75 births per woman | 4.1 births per woman |
| Population density | 187.1 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
Population map with other countries
Population
Growth rate visualization in other countries
Growth rate
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population comparisons