The latest officially reported population of Curacao was 155,900 in 2024 vs 16,634,373 people in Zimbabwe in 2024. In 2025, based on the adjusted UN estimation, the current Curacao's population is 155,910 people compared to 17,210,092 in Zimbabwe.
Population statistics:
- Zimbabwe's population is 110.4 times bigger than Curacao's.
- Curacao is ranked the 179th most populous country in the world, while Zimbabwe is the 74th.
- The countries together account for 0.21% of the world: 0.002% for Curacao vs 0.21% for Zimbabwe.
- For the last 10 years, Curacao has had an average growth rate of +0.14% per year vs +1.57% in Zimbabwe.
- Since 2005, the population of Curacao has increased from 138K people to 156K (13.3% growth), while Zimbabwe has grown from 12.5M to 17.2M (37.9% growth).
- Zimbabwe is projected to reach its peak in 2100 at 37.2M people, while Curacao's population already peaked in 2017 at 160K people and is projected to decrease to 101K people by 2100.
Curacao vs Zimbabwe: live population counter
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current population |
155910
|
17210092
|
| Population rank | 179/197 | 74/197 |
| Percent of world population | 0.002% | 0.21% |
| One net population change |
3.65 days
|
1.79 minutes
|
| One birth every |
7.5 hours
|
1.06 minutes
|
| One death every |
5.8 hours
|
4.22 minutes
|
| One migration net change every |
17.1 hours
|
8.68 minutes
|
| Annual migration change | +513 | -60,528 |
| Daily growth/decline | +0 | +804 |
| Annual growth/decline | +100 | +293,551 |
| Annual growth/decline rate | +0.06% | +1.8% |
| Population growth rate rank | 160/197 | 62/197 |
Curacao and Zimbabwe: population history and growth rate by year chart
| Year | Population | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 124,826 | 3,809,389 | - | - |
| 1961 | 126,125 | 3,930,401 | 1.04% | 3.18% |
| 1962 | 128,414 | 4,055,959 | 1.81% | 3.19% |
| 1963 | 130,860 | 4,185,877 | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| 1964 | 133,148 | 4,320,006 | 1.75% | 3.2% |
| 1965 | 135,266 | 4,458,462 | 1.59% | 3.2% |
| 1966 | 136,682 | 4,601,217 | 1.05% | 3.2% |
| 1967 | 138,140 | 4,748,307 | 1.07% | 3.2% |
| 1968 | 140,298 | 4,900,440 | 1.56% | 3.2% |
| 1969 | 142,581 | 5,058,181 | 1.63% | 3.22% |
| 1970 | 144,739 | 5,215,918 | 1.51% | 3.12% |
| 1971 | 147,389 | 5,374,712 | 1.83% | 3.04% |
| 1972 | 147,710 | 5,542,445 | 0.22% | 3.12% |
| 1973 | 146,912 | 5,720,404 | -0.54% | 3.21% |
| 1974 | 148,351 | 5,908,328 | 0.98% | 3.29% |
| 1975 | 149,129 | 6,098,658 | 0.52% | 3.22% |
| 1976 | 149,399 | 6,287,105 | 0.18% | 3.09% |
| 1977 | 149,459 | 6,449,512 | 0.04% | 2.58% |
| 1978 | 148,341 | 6,543,575 | -0.75% | 1.46% |
| 1979 | 147,851 | 6,647,556 | -0.33% | 1.59% |
| 1980 | 148,041 | 7,041,303 | 0.13% | 5.92% |
| 1981 | 148,629 | 7,498,635 | 0.4% | 6.49% |
| 1982 | 150,101 | 7,796,496 | 0.99% | 3.97% |
| 1983 | 151,159 | 8,098,404 | 0.7% | 3.87% |
| 1984 | 151,940 | 8,391,488 | 0.52% | 3.62% |
| 1985 | 152,711 | 8,686,813 | 0.51% | 3.52% |
| 1986 | 152,662 | 8,982,578 | -0.03% | 3.4% |
| 1987 | 151,456 | 9,284,644 | -0.79% | 3.36% |
| 1988 | 149,254 | 9,583,094 | -1.45% | 3.21% |
| 1989 | 146,937 | 9,864,798 | -1.55% | 2.94% |
| 1990 | 145,400 | 10,137,281 | -1.05% | 2.76% |
| 1991 | 144,403 | 10,404,816 | -0.69% | 2.64% |
| 1992 | 143,912 | 10,702,700 | -0.34% | 2.86% |
| 1993 | 144,299 | 10,860,288 | 0.27% | 1.47% |
| 1994 | 144,630 | 10,873,148 | 0.23% | 0.12% |
| 1995 | 145,139 | 10,974,599 | 0.35% | 0.93% |
| 1996 | 146,306 | 11,158,360 | 0.8% | 1.67% |
| 1997 | 146,956 | 11,369,827 | 0.44% | 1.9% |
| 1998 | 144,472 | 11,594,297 | -1.69% | 1.97% |
| 1999 | 139,428 | 11,783,458 | -3.49% | 1.63% |
| 2000 | 133,860 | 11,892,055 | -3.99% | 0.92% |
| 2001 | 129,047 | 11,971,901 | -3.6% | 0.67% |
| 2002 | 129,205 | 12,087,653 | 0.12% | 0.97% |
| 2003 | 131,897 | 12,232,323 | 2.08% | 1.2% |
| 2004 | 134,192 | 12,365,896 | 1.74% | 1.09% |
| 2005 | 137,658 | 12,483,432 | 2.58% | 0.95% |
| 2006 | 141,239 | 12,636,445 | 2.6% | 1.23% |
| 2007 | 144,056 | 12,804,058 | 1.99% | 1.33% |
| 2008 | 145,880 | 12,959,149 | 1.27% | 1.21% |
| 2009 | 146,833 | 13,142,790 | 0.65% | 1.42% |
| 2010 | 148,703 | 13,356,548 | 1.27% | 1.63% |
| 2011 | 150,831 | 13,595,424 | 1.43% | 1.79% |
| 2012 | 152,088 | 13,817,887 | 0.83% | 1.64% |
| 2013 | 153,822 | 14,013,808 | 1.14% | 1.42% |
| 2014 | 155,909 | 14,207,359 | 1.36% | 1.38% |
| 2015 | 157,980 | 14,399,013 | 1.33% | 1.35% |
| 2016 | 159,664 | 14,600,294 | 1.07% | 1.4% |
| 2017 | 160,175 | 14,812,482 | 0.32% | 1.45% |
| 2018 | 159,336 | 15,034,452 | -0.52% | 1.5% |
| 2019 | 157,441 | 15,271,368 | -1.19% | 1.58% |
| 2020 | 154,947 | 15,526,888 | -1.58% | 1.67% |
| 2021 | 152,369 | 15,797,210 | -1.66% | 1.74% |
| 2022 | 149,996 | 16,069,056 | -1.56% | 1.72% |
| 2023 | 155,800 | 16,340,822 | 3.87% | 1.69% |
| 2024 | 155,900 | 16,634,373 | 0.06% | 1.8% |
| 2025 | 155,910 | 16,950,805 | 0.007% | 1.9% |
| 2026 | 155,878 | 17,273,591 | -0.02% | 1.9% |
| 2027 | 155,806 | 17,600,621 | -0.05% | 1.89% |
| 2028 | 155,710 | 17,932,015 | -0.06% | 1.88% |
| 2029 | 155,558 | 18,268,967 | -0.1% | 1.88% |
| 2030 | 155,356 | 18,610,356 | -0.13% | 1.87% |
| 2031 | 155,112 | 18,956,207 | -0.16% | 1.86% |
| 2032 | 154,845 | 19,311,368 | -0.17% | 1.87% |
| 2033 | 154,546 | 19,675,929 | -0.19% | 1.89% |
| 2034 | 154,200 | 20,041,125 | -0.22% | 1.86% |
| 2035 | 153,844 | 20,409,159 | -0.23% | 1.84% |
| 2036 | 153,444 | 20,778,662 | -0.26% | 1.81% |
| 2037 | 153,028 | 21,144,748 | -0.27% | 1.76% |
| 2038 | 152,600 | 21,512,919 | -0.28% | 1.74% |
| 2039 | 152,140 | 21,881,123 | -0.3% | 1.71% |
| 2040 | 151,635 | 22,250,123 | -0.33% | 1.69% |
| 2041 | 151,130 | 22,627,428 | -0.33% | 1.7% |
| 2042 | 150,608 | 23,000,906 | -0.35% | 1.65% |
| 2043 | 150,071 | 23,371,301 | -0.36% | 1.61% |
| 2044 | 149,519 | 23,740,630 | -0.37% | 1.58% |
| 2045 | 148,941 | 24,102,391 | -0.39% | 1.52% |
| 2046 | 148,367 | 24,462,491 | -0.39% | 1.49% |
| 2047 | 147,763 | 24,816,449 | -0.41% | 1.45% |
| 2048 | 147,130 | 25,168,419 | -0.43% | 1.42% |
| 2049 | 146,495 | 25,518,513 | -0.43% | 1.39% |
| 2050 | 145,829 | 25,866,397 | -0.45% | 1.36% |
From 2005 to 2015, the population of Curacao increased by 20,322 people (a 14.8% growth), while Zimbabwe gained 1,915,581 people (a 15.3% growth).
For the next 10 years, from 2015 to 2025, Curacao lost -2,070 (a 1.31% decline), while Zimbabwe's population increased by 2,811,079 (a 19.5% growth).
Curacao was ranked 179th most populous country in 2005 and is still 179th in 2025. Zimbabwe was ranked 70th in 2005 and ranked 74th now.
The UN's World Population Prospects forecasts that with changing growth rate trends in 25 years (in 2050) Curacao's population will shrink by 6.47% to 145,829 people with a rank change from 179th to 180th. The population of Zimbabwe will increase by 50.3% to 25,866,397 people and rank change from 74th to 65th.
Biggest cities by population
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population differences between Curacao and Zimbabwe
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy | 77.2 years | 63.3 years |
| Average age | 40.8 years | 23.6 years |
| Median age | 39.5 years | 19 years |
| Male:Female ratio | 47.6:52.4 | 47.7:52.3 |
| Fertility rate | 1.2 births per woman | 3.72 births per woman |
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 111.4 ppl/mi² |
Population map with other countries
Population
Growth rate visualization in other countries
Growth rate
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population comparisons