Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Costa Rica are ranked 164th and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in Brazil is 74.8% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 88% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 259 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 63 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 62 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 61 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 60 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 59 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 213 |
| 2003 | 56 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 47 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 42 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 118 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 35 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 31 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 26 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 82% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 86% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 75% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 84% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 79% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 50% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 69% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 42% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 41% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 54% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 53% | 37% |
| 1966 | 52% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 51% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sao Paulo | 11.5M |
| Rio de Janeiro | 6.21M |
| Brasilia | 2.82M |
| Fortaleza | 2.43M |
| Salvador | 2.42M |
| Belo Horizonte | 2.32M |
| Manaus | 2.06M |
| Curitiba | 1.77M |
| Recife | 1.49M |
| Goiania | 1.44M |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons