Costa Rica has a population density of 260.2 people per square mile compared to 21,776 people in Singapore. Costa Rica has 107,389 sq ft of land per person vs 1,282 sq ft in Singapore. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Costa Rica and Singapore are ranked 91st and 2nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Costa Rica has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Singapore, hence the population density in Costa Rica is 98.8% lower than in Singapore.
Population density comparison
Costa Rica
|
Singapore
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 260.2 ppl/mi² | 21,776 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 91/197 | 2/197 |
| Population |
5170484
|
6105665
|
| Land area | 19,714 sq mi | 277.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 107,137 sq ft | 1,280 sq ft |
| Rural population | 16.8% | 0% |
| Urban population | 83.2% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 97.2% |
Costa Rica vs Singapore:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Costa Rica increased by 22.1%, compared to a 39% growth in Singapore.
In 2004, Costa Rica ranked 88th for population density and is in 91st place now. Singapore was 2nd in 2004 and still ranks 2nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Costa Rica
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2024 | 260.2 | 21,776 |
| 2023 | 259 | 21,346 |
| 2022 | 257.8 | 20,334 |
| 2021 | 256.7 | 19,672 |
| 2020 | 255.4 | 20,510 |
| 2019 | 253.6 | 20,632 |
| 2018 | 251.5 | 20,454 |
| 2017 | 249.2 | 20,415 |
| 2016 | 246.9 | 20,483 |
| 2015 | 244.4 | 20,219 |
| 2014 | 241.8 | 19,981 |
| 2013 | 239.2 | 19,779 |
| 2012 | 236.6 | 19,489 |
| 2011 | 233.8 | 19,071 |
| 2010 | 231.1 | 18,730 |
| 2009 | 228.2 | 18,454 |
| 2008 | 225.2 | 17,906 |
| 2007 | 222.2 | 17,100 |
| 2006 | 219.2 | 16,426 |
| 2005 | 216.1 | 16,035 |
| 2004 | 213 | 15,663 |
| 2003 | 209.9 | 15,513 |
| 2002 | 206.7 | 16,023 |
| 2001 | 203.4 | 15,996 |
| 2000 | 199.7 | 15,570 |
| 1999 | 195.9 | 15,303 |
| 1998 | 191.9 | 15,181 |
| 1997 | 187.8 | 14,674 |
| 1996 | 183.6 | 14,190 |
| 1995 | 179.3 | 13,625 |
| 1994 | 175.1 | 13,217 |
| 1993 | 170.8 | 12,809 |
| 1992 | 166.6 | 12,489 |
| 1991 | 162.4 | 12,119 |
| 1990 | 158.3 | 11,779 |
| 1989 | 154.4 | 11,330 |
| 1988 | 150.6 | 11,002 |
| 1987 | 146.7 | 10,726 |
| 1986 | 142.9 | 10,566 |
| 1985 | 139.1 | 10,576 |
| 1984 | 135.3 | 10,562 |
| 1983 | 131.6 | 10,364 |
| 1982 | 128.1 | 10,230 |
| 1981 | 124.6 | 9,791 |
| 1980 | 121.3 | 9,331 |
| 1979 | 118 | 9,214 |
| 1978 | 114.9 | 9,098 |
| 1977 | 111.8 | 8,989 |
| 1976 | 108.9 | 8,865 |
| 1975 | 106.2 | 8,746 |
| 1974 | 103.5 | 8,620 |
| 1973 | 100.9 | 8,477 |
| 1972 | 98.3 | 8,320 |
| 1971 | 95.8 | 8,168 |
| 1970 | 93.3 | 8,019 |
| 1969 | 90.8 | 7,896 |
| 1968 | 88.2 | 7,778 |
| 1967 | 85.7 | 7,645 |
| 1966 | 83.1 | 7,478 |
| 1965 | 80.5 | 7,294 |
| 1964 | 77.8 | 7,119 |
| 1963 | 75.2 | 6,939 |
| 1962 | 72.5 | 6,766 |
| 1961 | 69.9 | 6,581 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Costa Rica
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2% | 100% |
| 2023 | 82.6% | 100% |
| 2022 | 82% | 100% |
| 2021 | 81.4% | 100% |
| 2020 | 80.8% | 100% |
| 2019 | 80.1% | 100% |
| 2018 | 79.3% | 100% |
| 2017 | 78.6% | 100% |
| 2016 | 77.7% | 100% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 100% |
| 2014 | 75.9% | 100% |
| 2013 | 75% | 100% |
| 2012 | 73.9% | 100% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 100% |
| 2010 | 71.7% | 100% |
| 2009 | 70.6% | 100% |
| 2008 | 69.4% | 100% |
| 2007 | 68.2% | 100% |
| 2006 | 66.9% | 100% |
| 2005 | 65.7% | 100% |
| 2004 | 64.4% | 100% |
| 2003 | 63.1% | 100% |
| 2002 | 61.8% | 100% |
| 2001 | 60.4% | 100% |
| 2000 | 59.1% | 100% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 100% |
| 1998 | 57.3% | 100% |
| 1997 | 56.4% | 100% |
| 1996 | 55.5% | 100% |
| 1995 | 54.6% | 100% |
| 1994 | 53.7% | 100% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 100% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 100% |
| 1991 | 50.9% | 100% |
| 1990 | 50% | 100% |
| 1989 | 49.1% | 100% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 100% |
| 1987 | 47.3% | 100% |
| 1986 | 46.4% | 100% |
| 1985 | 45.4% | 100% |
| 1984 | 44.5% | 100% |
| 1983 | 44.2% | 100% |
| 1982 | 43.8% | 100% |
| 1981 | 43.5% | 100% |
| 1980 | 43.1% | 100% |
| 1979 | 42.7% | 100% |
| 1978 | 42.4% | 100% |
| 1977 | 42% | 100% |
| 1976 | 41.7% | 100% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 100% |
| 1974 | 41% | 100% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 100% |
| 1972 | 40.1% | 100% |
| 1971 | 39.4% | 100% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 100% |
| 1969 | 38.2% | 100% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 100% |
| 1967 | 37% | 100% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 100% |
| 1965 | 35.8% | 100% |
| 1964 | 35.2% | 100% |
| 1963 | 34.6% | 100% |
| 1962 | 34.4% | 100% |
| 1961 | 34.3% | 100% |
| 1960 | 34.3% | 100% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica and from 100% to 100% in Singapore.
Densely populated cities
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
|
Singapore
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Singapore | 5.87M |
| Bukit Merah | 152K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
