Costa Rica has a population density of 260.2 people per square mile compared to 893 people in Grenada. Costa Rica has 107,389 sq ft of land per person vs 32,005 sq ft in Grenada. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Costa Rica and Grenada are ranked 91st and 27th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Costa Rica has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Grenada, hence the population density in Costa Rica is 70.9% lower than in Grenada.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 260.2 ppl/mi² | 893 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 91/197 | 27/197 |
| Population |
5170484
|
117349
|
| Land area | 19,714 sq mi | 131.3 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 107,137 sq ft | 31,224 sq ft |
| Rural population | 16.8% | 62.7% |
| Urban population | 83.2% | 37.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Costa Rica vs Grenada:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Costa Rica increased by 22.1%, compared to a 7.21% growth in Grenada.
In 2004, Costa Rica ranked 88th for population density and is in 91st place now. Grenada was 23rd in 2004 and ranks 27th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 260.2 | 893 |
| 2023 | 259 | 892 |
| 2022 | 257.8 | 891 |
| 2021 | 256.7 | 889 |
| 2020 | 255.4 | 886 |
| 2019 | 253.6 | 883 |
| 2018 | 251.5 | 881 |
| 2017 | 249.2 | 879 |
| 2016 | 246.9 | 877 |
| 2015 | 244.4 | 874 |
| 2014 | 241.8 | 869 |
| 2013 | 239.2 | 864 |
| 2012 | 236.6 | 859 |
| 2011 | 233.8 | 854 |
| 2010 | 231.1 | 850 |
| 2009 | 228.2 | 847 |
| 2008 | 225.2 | 845 |
| 2007 | 222.2 | 842 |
| 2006 | 219.2 | 839 |
| 2005 | 216.1 | 836 |
| 2004 | 213 | 833 |
| 2003 | 209.9 | 829 |
| 2002 | 206.7 | 826 |
| 2001 | 203.4 | 823 |
| 2000 | 199.7 | 819 |
| 1999 | 195.9 | 813 |
| 1998 | 191.9 | 808 |
| 1997 | 187.8 | 802 |
| 1996 | 183.6 | 797 |
| 1995 | 179.3 | 791 |
| 1994 | 175.1 | 786 |
| 1993 | 170.8 | 780 |
| 1992 | 166.6 | 774 |
| 1991 | 162.4 | 768 |
| 1990 | 158.3 | 761 |
| 1989 | 154.4 | 755 |
| 1988 | 150.6 | 749 |
| 1987 | 146.7 | 743 |
| 1986 | 142.9 | 737 |
| 1985 | 139.1 | 732 |
| 1984 | 135.3 | 727 |
| 1983 | 131.6 | 723 |
| 1982 | 128.1 | 719 |
| 1981 | 124.6 | 716 |
| 1980 | 121.3 | 720 |
| 1979 | 118 | 727 |
| 1978 | 114.9 | 734 |
| 1977 | 111.8 | 739 |
| 1976 | 108.9 | 744 |
| 1975 | 106.2 | 747 |
| 1974 | 103.5 | 750 |
| 1973 | 100.9 | 752 |
| 1972 | 98.3 | 752 |
| 1971 | 95.8 | 751 |
| 1970 | 93.3 | 750 |
| 1969 | 90.8 | 748 |
| 1968 | 88.2 | 747 |
| 1967 | 85.7 | 747 |
| 1966 | 83.1 | 747 |
| 1965 | 80.5 | 747 |
| 1964 | 77.8 | 745 |
| 1963 | 75.2 | 740 |
| 1962 | 72.5 | 734 |
| 1961 | 69.9 | 726 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2% | 37.3% |
| 2023 | 82.6% | 37.1% |
| 2022 | 82% | 36.9% |
| 2021 | 81.4% | 36.7% |
| 2020 | 80.8% | 36.5% |
| 2019 | 80.1% | 36.4% |
| 2018 | 79.3% | 36.3% |
| 2017 | 78.6% | 36.2% |
| 2016 | 77.7% | 36.1% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 36% |
| 2014 | 75.9% | 35.9% |
| 2013 | 75% | 35.9% |
| 2012 | 73.9% | 35.9% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 35.9% |
| 2010 | 71.7% | 35.9% |
| 2009 | 70.6% | 35.9% |
| 2008 | 69.4% | 35.9% |
| 2007 | 68.2% | 35.9% |
| 2006 | 66.9% | 35.9% |
| 2005 | 65.7% | 35.9% |
| 2004 | 64.4% | 35.9% |
| 2003 | 63.1% | 35.9% |
| 2002 | 61.8% | 35.9% |
| 2001 | 60.4% | 35.9% |
| 2000 | 59.1% | 35.7% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 35.5% |
| 1998 | 57.3% | 35.2% |
| 1997 | 56.4% | 35% |
| 1996 | 55.5% | 34.7% |
| 1995 | 54.6% | 34.5% |
| 1994 | 53.7% | 34.2% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 34% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 33.7% |
| 1991 | 50.9% | 33.5% |
| 1990 | 50% | 33.4% |
| 1989 | 49.1% | 33.4% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 33.3% |
| 1987 | 47.3% | 33.3% |
| 1986 | 46.4% | 33.2% |
| 1985 | 45.4% | 33.2% |
| 1984 | 44.5% | 33.1% |
| 1983 | 44.2% | 33.1% |
| 1982 | 43.8% | 33% |
| 1981 | 43.5% | 33% |
| 1980 | 43.1% | 32.9% |
| 1979 | 42.7% | 32.8% |
| 1978 | 42.4% | 32.8% |
| 1977 | 42% | 32.7% |
| 1976 | 41.7% | 32.6% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 32.6% |
| 1974 | 41% | 32.5% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 32.4% |
| 1972 | 40.1% | 32.4% |
| 1971 | 39.4% | 32.3% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 32.2% |
| 1969 | 38.2% | 32% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 31.8% |
| 1967 | 37% | 31.7% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 31.5% |
| 1965 | 35.8% | 31.3% |
| 1964 | 35.2% | 31.1% |
| 1963 | 34.6% | 30.9% |
| 1962 | 34.4% | 30.7% |
| 1961 | 34.3% | 30.5% |
| 1960 | 34.3% | 30.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica and from 35.9% to 37.3% in Grenada.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons