Costa Rica has a population density of 260.2 people per square mile compared to 202.3 people in Ireland. Costa Rica has 107,389 sq ft of land per person vs 139,638 sq ft in Ireland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Costa Rica and Ireland are ranked 91st and 112th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Costa Rica has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for Ireland, hence the population density in Costa Rica is 28.6% higher than in Ireland.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 260.2 ppl/mi² | 202.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 91/197 | 112/197 |
| Population |
5170484
|
5474763
|
| Land area | 19,714 sq mi | 26,599 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 107,137 sq ft | 137,823 sq ft |
| Rural population | 16.8% | 35.2% |
| Urban population | 83.2% | 64.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Costa Rica vs Ireland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Costa Rica increased by 22.1%, compared to a 32.2% growth in Ireland.
In 2004, Costa Rica ranked 88th for population density and is in 91st place now. Ireland was 115th in 2004 and ranks 112th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 260.2 | 202.3 |
| 2023 | 259 | 199.5 |
| 2022 | 257.8 | 196 |
| 2021 | 256.7 | 192.1 |
| 2020 | 255.4 | 189.5 |
| 2019 | 253.6 | 187.1 |
| 2018 | 251.5 | 184.1 |
| 2017 | 249.2 | 181.5 |
| 2016 | 246.9 | 179.1 |
| 2015 | 244.4 | 176.8 |
| 2014 | 241.8 | 175.1 |
| 2013 | 239.2 | 173.8 |
| 2012 | 236.6 | 172.9 |
| 2011 | 233.8 | 172.2 |
| 2010 | 231.1 | 171.4 |
| 2009 | 228.2 | 170.5 |
| 2008 | 225.2 | 168.8 |
| 2007 | 222.2 | 165.4 |
| 2006 | 219.2 | 160.7 |
| 2005 | 216.1 | 156.4 |
| 2004 | 213 | 153 |
| 2003 | 209.9 | 150.3 |
| 2002 | 206.7 | 147.8 |
| 2001 | 203.4 | 145.4 |
| 2000 | 199.7 | 143.1 |
| 1999 | 195.9 | 141.2 |
| 1998 | 191.9 | 139.6 |
| 1997 | 187.8 | 138.1 |
| 1996 | 183.6 | 136.8 |
| 1995 | 179.3 | 135.7 |
| 1994 | 175.1 | 135 |
| 1993 | 170.8 | 134.5 |
| 1992 | 166.6 | 133.8 |
| 1991 | 162.4 | 132.9 |
| 1990 | 158.3 | 132.1 |
| 1989 | 154.4 | 132 |
| 1988 | 150.6 | 132.5 |
| 1987 | 146.7 | 133.1 |
| 1986 | 142.9 | 133.1 |
| 1985 | 139.1 | 133 |
| 1984 | 135.3 | 132.8 |
| 1983 | 131.6 | 132 |
| 1982 | 128.1 | 131.1 |
| 1981 | 124.6 | 129.8 |
| 1980 | 121.3 | 128.3 |
| 1979 | 118 | 126.8 |
| 1978 | 114.9 | 125.2 |
| 1977 | 111.8 | 123.4 |
| 1976 | 108.9 | 121.7 |
| 1975 | 106.2 | 119.9 |
| 1974 | 103.5 | 118 |
| 1973 | 100.9 | 116 |
| 1972 | 98.3 | 114.2 |
| 1971 | 95.8 | 112.5 |
| 1970 | 93.3 | 111.2 |
| 1969 | 90.8 | 110.3 |
| 1968 | 88.2 | 109.6 |
| 1967 | 85.7 | 109.1 |
| 1966 | 83.1 | 108.6 |
| 1965 | 80.5 | 108.2 |
| 1964 | 77.8 | 107.8 |
| 1963 | 75.2 | 107.2 |
| 1962 | 72.5 | 106.6 |
| 1961 | 69.9 | 106.2 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2% | 64.8% |
| 2023 | 82.6% | 64.5% |
| 2022 | 82% | 64.2% |
| 2021 | 81.4% | 63.9% |
| 2020 | 80.8% | 63.7% |
| 2019 | 80.1% | 63.4% |
| 2018 | 79.3% | 63.2% |
| 2017 | 78.6% | 62.9% |
| 2016 | 77.7% | 62.7% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 62.5% |
| 2014 | 75.9% | 62.3% |
| 2013 | 75% | 62.1% |
| 2012 | 73.9% | 61.9% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 61.7% |
| 2010 | 71.7% | 61.5% |
| 2009 | 70.6% | 61.3% |
| 2008 | 69.4% | 61.1% |
| 2007 | 68.2% | 60.9% |
| 2006 | 66.9% | 60.7% |
| 2005 | 65.7% | 60.5% |
| 2004 | 64.4% | 60.2% |
| 2003 | 63.1% | 59.9% |
| 2002 | 61.8% | 59.6% |
| 2001 | 60.4% | 59.4% |
| 2000 | 59.1% | 59.2% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 58.9% |
| 1998 | 57.3% | 58.7% |
| 1997 | 56.4% | 58.4% |
| 1996 | 55.5% | 58.2% |
| 1995 | 54.6% | 57.9% |
| 1994 | 53.7% | 57.7% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 57.5% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 57.3% |
| 1991 | 50.9% | 57.1% |
| 1990 | 50% | 56.9% |
| 1989 | 49.1% | 56.8% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 56.7% |
| 1987 | 47.3% | 56.6% |
| 1986 | 46.4% | 56.4% |
| 1985 | 45.4% | 56.3% |
| 1984 | 44.5% | 56.1% |
| 1983 | 44.2% | 56% |
| 1982 | 43.8% | 55.8% |
| 1981 | 43.5% | 55.6% |
| 1980 | 43.1% | 55.3% |
| 1979 | 42.7% | 55% |
| 1978 | 42.4% | 54.7% |
| 1977 | 42% | 54.3% |
| 1976 | 41.7% | 54% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 53.6% |
| 1974 | 41% | 53.3% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 53% |
| 1972 | 40.1% | 52.6% |
| 1971 | 39.4% | 52.3% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 51.3% |
| 1969 | 38.2% | 50.1% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 49% |
| 1967 | 37% | 47.8% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 46.6% |
| 1965 | 35.8% | 46.2% |
| 1964 | 35.2% | 46% |
| 1963 | 34.6% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 34.4% | 45.6% |
| 1961 | 34.3% | 45.4% |
| 1960 | 34.3% | 45.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica and from 60.2% to 64.8% in Ireland.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons