Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 244 people in East Timor. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 114,650 sq ft in East Timor. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and East Timor are ranked 164th and 99th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for East Timor, hence the population density in Brazil is 73.1% lower than in East Timor.
Population density comparison
Brazil
|
East Timor
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 244 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 99/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
1433311
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 5,741 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 114,276 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 67.2% |
| Urban population | 88% | 32.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs East Timor:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 50.8% growth in East Timor.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. East Timor was 109th in 2004 and ranks 99th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 244 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 241.1 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 238.5 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 235.2 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 231 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 226.6 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 222.2 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 218 |
| 2016 | 63 | 213.9 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 209.9 |
| 2014 | 62 | 205.9 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 201.8 |
| 2012 | 61 | 197.7 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 193.4 |
| 2010 | 60 | 188.9 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 184.4 |
| 2008 | 59 | 179.8 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 175 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 170.1 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 165.2 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 161.8 |
| 2003 | 56 | 159.7 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 153.1 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 141.5 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 129.8 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 145.4 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 164.2 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 159.8 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 155.4 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 151.2 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 147.1 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 143.1 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 139.2 |
| 1991 | 47 | 135.6 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 132.4 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 129.7 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 127.3 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 125.1 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 123.2 |
| 1985 | 42 | 121.3 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 119.6 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 118 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 116.5 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 115 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 113.2 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 111.2 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 109.5 |
| 1977 | 35 | 107.7 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 105.8 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 104.2 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 102.9 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 101.5 |
| 1972 | 31 | 99.8 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 98.1 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 96.3 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 94.6 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 93 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 91.4 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 89.8 |
| 1965 | 26 | 88.3 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 86.9 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 85.4 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 84.1 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 82.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 32.8% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 32.1% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 31.7% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 30.9% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 30.6% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 30.2% |
| 2016 | 86% | 29.8% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 29.5% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 29.1% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 28.8% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 28.4% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 28.1% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | 84% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 27% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 26.7% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 26.4% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 26% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 25.7% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 25.3% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 25% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 24.6% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 24.3% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 23.6% |
| 1997 | 79% | 23.2% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 22.5% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 22.2% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 21.9% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 21.5% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 20.8% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 20.4% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 19.9% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 19.5% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 19% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 69% | 18.1% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 17.7% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 17.3% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 16.9% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 15.7% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 15.3% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 15% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 14.6% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 14.2% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 13.9% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 13.2% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 12.9% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 12.6% |
| 1968 | 54% | 12.3% |
| 1967 | 53% | 11.9% |
| 1966 | 52% | 11.6% |
| 1965 | 51% | 11.4% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 10.8% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 10.5% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 10.2% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 10.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
