The Congo has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. The Congo has 581,285 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Congo and Costa Rica are ranked 174th and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Congo has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.23% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in the Congo is 81.5% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 174/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
6607609
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 131,854 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,436 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30.4% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 69.6% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 56.3% | 0% |
the Congo vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Congo increased by 77.6%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, the Congo ranked 174th for population density and is in 174th place still. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 46.9 | 259 |
| 2022 | 45.8 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 44.7 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 43.6 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 41.6 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 40.6 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 39.6 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 38.7 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 37.7 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 36.8 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 36 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 35 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 33.8 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 32.5 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 31.2 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 30.2 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 29.1 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 28 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 27 | 213 |
| 2003 | 26.1 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 25.4 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 24.8 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 23.9 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 23 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 22.4 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 21.9 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 21.4 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 20.9 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 20.3 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 19.7 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 19.1 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 18.6 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 18.1 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 17.5 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 17 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 16.6 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 16.1 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 15.6 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 15.2 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 14.8 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 14.5 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 14.2 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 13.9 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 13.6 | 118 |
| 1978 | 13.3 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 13 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 12 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 11.6 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 11.3 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 10.9 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 10.6 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 10.3 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 9.98 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 9.7 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 9.42 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 9.16 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 8.91 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 8.67 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 8.44 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 8.22 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 69.6% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 69.2% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 68.7% | 82% |
| 2021 | 68.3% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 67.8% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 67.4% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 66.9% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 66.5% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 66% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 65.5% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 65.1% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 64.6% | 75% |
| 2012 | 64.2% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 63.7% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 63.3% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 62.8% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 62.3% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 61.9% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 61.4% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 61% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 60.5% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 60.1% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 59.6% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 59.2% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 58.7% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 57.8% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 57.3% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 56.8% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 56.4% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 56% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 55.6% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 55.2% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 54.7% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 54.3% | 50% |
| 1989 | 53.9% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 53.5% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 53.1% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 52.6% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 52.2% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 51.6% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 50.6% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 49.7% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 48.8% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 47.9% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 46.9% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 46% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 45.1% | 42% |
| 1976 | 44.2% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 43.3% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 42.4% | 41% |
| 1973 | 41.5% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 40.7% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 39.9% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 39.1% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 38.3% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 36.8% | 37% |
| 1966 | 36% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 35.3% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 34.5% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 33.8% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 33% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 32.3% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 31.6% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 60.5% to 69.6% in the Congo and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Brazzaville | 2.15M |
| Pointe-Noire | 1.42M |
| Kayes | 71.6K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons