Australia has a population density of 9.16 people per square mile compared to 65.7 people in Brazil. Australia has 3,043,442 sq ft of land per person vs 432,375 sq ft in Brazil. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Australia and Brazil are ranked 196th and 164th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of the land area of all countries, compared to 2.6% of the population and 5.61% of the land area for Brazil, hence the population density in Australia is 86.1% lower than in Brazil.
Population density comparison
Australia
|
Brazil
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.16 ppl/mi² | 65.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 164/197 |
| Population |
27677455
|
213415080
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 3,227,096 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,043,440 sq ft | 424,372 sq ft |
| Rural population | 13.2% | 12% |
| Urban population | 86.8% | 88% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 62.6% | 19.2% |
Australia vs Brazil:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Australia increased by 36.3%, compared to a 16.1% growth in Brazil.
In 2004, Australia ranked 190th for population density and is in 196th place now. Brazil was 152nd in 2004 and ranks 164th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Brazil
|
|
| 2024 | 9.16 | 65.7 |
| 2023 | 8.97 | 65.4 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 65.2 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 64.9 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 64.7 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 64.3 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 63.9 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 63.4 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 63 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 62.5 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 62 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 61.5 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 61 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 60.5 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | 60 |
| 2009 | 7.31 | 59.5 |
| 2008 | 7.16 | 59 |
| 2007 | 7.02 | 58.4 |
| 2006 | 6.89 | 57.8 |
| 2005 | 6.8 | 57.2 |
| 2004 | 6.72 | 56.6 |
| 2003 | 6.65 | 56 |
| 2002 | 6.57 | 55.3 |
| 2001 | 6.5 | 54.6 |
| 2000 | 6.42 | 53.9 |
| 1999 | 6.34 | 53.2 |
| 1998 | 6.27 | 52.4 |
| 1997 | 6.21 | 51.6 |
| 1996 | 6.14 | 50.9 |
| 1995 | 6.07 | 50.1 |
| 1994 | 6 | 49.4 |
| 1993 | 5.95 | 48.6 |
| 1992 | 5.89 | 47.8 |
| 1991 | 5.83 | 47 |
| 1990 | 5.75 | 46.2 |
| 1989 | 5.67 | 45.4 |
| 1988 | 5.57 | 44.6 |
| 1987 | 5.48 | 43.7 |
| 1986 | 5.4 | 42.9 |
| 1985 | 5.32 | 42 |
| 1984 | 5.25 | 41.1 |
| 1983 | 5.19 | 40.2 |
| 1982 | 5.12 | 39.3 |
| 1981 | 5.03 | 38.4 |
| 1980 | 4.95 | 37.6 |
| 1979 | 4.89 | 36.7 |
| 1978 | 4.84 | 35.8 |
| 1977 | 4.78 | 35 |
| 1976 | 4.73 | 34.2 |
| 1975 | 4.68 | 33.3 |
| 1974 | 4.63 | 32.6 |
| 1973 | 4.51 | 31.8 |
| 1972 | 4.44 | 31 |
| 1971 | 4.36 | 30.3 |
| 1970 | 4.22 | 29.6 |
| 1969 | 4.13 | 28.8 |
| 1968 | 4.05 | 28.1 |
| 1967 | 3.98 | 27.4 |
| 1966 | 3.93 | 26.7 |
| 1965 | 3.84 | 26 |
| 1964 | 3.76 | 25.3 |
| 1963 | 3.69 | 24.5 |
| 1962 | 3.62 | 23.8 |
| 1961 | 3.53 | 23.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Brazil
|
|
| 2024 | 86.8% | 88% |
| 2023 | 86.6% | 87.8% |
| 2022 | 86.5% | 87.6% |
| 2021 | 86.4% | 87.3% |
| 2020 | 86.2% | 87.1% |
| 2019 | 86.1% | 86.8% |
| 2018 | 86% | 86.6% |
| 2017 | 85.9% | 86.3% |
| 2016 | 85.8% | 86% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 85.8% |
| 2014 | 85.6% | 85.5% |
| 2013 | 85.5% | 85.2% |
| 2012 | 85.4% | 84.9% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 84.6% |
| 2010 | 85.2% | 84.3% |
| 2009 | 85.1% | 84% |
| 2008 | 84.9% | 83.7% |
| 2007 | 84.8% | 83.4% |
| 2006 | 84.7% | 83.1% |
| 2005 | 84.6% | 82.8% |
| 2004 | 84.5% | 82.5% |
| 2003 | 84.3% | 82.2% |
| 2002 | 84.2% | 81.9% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 81.6% |
| 2000 | 84.2% | 81.2% |
| 1999 | 84.4% | 80.5% |
| 1998 | 84.5% | 79.8% |
| 1997 | 84.6% | 79% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 78.3% |
| 1995 | 84.9% | 77.6% |
| 1994 | 85% | 76.9% |
| 1993 | 85.2% | 76.2% |
| 1992 | 85.3% | 75.4% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 74.7% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 73.9% |
| 1989 | 85.5% | 73.1% |
| 1988 | 85.5% | 72.3% |
| 1987 | 85.5% | 71.5% |
| 1986 | 85.6% | 70.7% |
| 1985 | 85.6% | 69.9% |
| 1984 | 85.6% | 69% |
| 1983 | 85.6% | 68.1% |
| 1982 | 85.7% | 67.3% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 66.4% |
| 1980 | 85.6% | 65.5% |
| 1979 | 85.4% | 64.6% |
| 1978 | 85.3% | 63.6% |
| 1977 | 85.1% | 62.7% |
| 1976 | 84.9% | 61.7% |
| 1975 | 84.8% | 60.8% |
| 1974 | 84.6% | 59.8% |
| 1973 | 84.5% | 58.9% |
| 1972 | 84.3% | 57.9% |
| 1971 | 84.2% | 56.9% |
| 1970 | 84% | 55.9% |
| 1969 | 83.8% | 54.9% |
| 1968 | 83.7% | 54% |
| 1967 | 83.5% | 53% |
| 1966 | 83.3% | 52% |
| 1965 | 83.1% | 51% |
| 1964 | 82.8% | 50.1% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 49.1% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 48.1% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 47.1% |
| 1960 | 81.5% | 46.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.5% to 86.8% in Australia and from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
