Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 365 people in the Czech Republic. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 78,009 sq ft in the Czech Republic. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and the Czech Republic are ranked 164th and 69th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for the Czech Republic, hence the population density in Brazil is 82% lower than in the Czech Republic.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 365 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
10753822
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 29,794 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 76,329 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 25.3% |
| Urban population | 88% | 74.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 12.8% |
Brazil vs the Czech Republic:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 6.85% growth in the Czech Republic.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. The Czech Republic was 59th in 2004 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 365 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 365 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 358 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 353 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 359 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 358 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 357 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 355 |
| 2016 | 63 | 354 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 354 |
| 2014 | 62 | 353 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 353 |
| 2012 | 61 | 352 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 352 |
| 2010 | 60 | 351 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 350 |
| 2008 | 59 | 348 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 345 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 343 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 342 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 342 |
| 2003 | 56 | 342 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 342 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 342 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 344 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 345 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 345 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 345 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 346 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 346 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 346 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 346 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | - |
| 1991 | 47 | - |
| 1990 | 46.2 | - |
| 1989 | 45.4 | - |
| 1988 | 44.6 | - |
| 1987 | 43.7 | - |
| 1986 | 42.9 | - |
| 1985 | 42 | - |
| 1984 | 41.1 | - |
| 1983 | 40.2 | - |
| 1982 | 39.3 | - |
| 1981 | 38.4 | - |
| 1980 | 37.6 | - |
| 1979 | 36.7 | - |
| 1978 | 35.8 | - |
| 1977 | 35 | - |
| 1976 | 34.2 | - |
| 1975 | 33.3 | - |
| 1974 | 32.6 | - |
| 1973 | 31.8 | - |
| 1972 | 31 | - |
| 1971 | 30.3 | - |
| 1970 | 29.6 | - |
| 1969 | 28.8 | - |
| 1968 | 28.1 | - |
| 1967 | 27.4 | - |
| 1966 | 26.7 | - |
| 1965 | 26 | - |
| 1964 | 25.3 | - |
| 1963 | 24.5 | - |
| 1962 | 23.8 | - |
| 1961 | 23.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 74.7% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 74.6% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 74.4% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 74.2% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 74.1% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 73.9% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 73.8% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 73.7% |
| 2016 | 86% | 73.6% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 73.5% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 73.4% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 73.3% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 73.2% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 73.3% |
| 2009 | 84% | 73.3% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 73.5% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 73.6% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 73.7% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 73.7% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 73.8% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 73.9% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 74% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 74.1% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 74.3% |
| 1997 | 79% | 74.4% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 74.5% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 74.6% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 74.8% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 74.9% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 75% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 75.2% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 75.2% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 75.2% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 75.3% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 75.3% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 75.3% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 75.4% |
| 1984 | 69% | 75.4% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 75.4% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 75.5% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 75.5% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 75.2% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 74.2% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 73.1% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 72.1% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 71% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 69.9% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 68.8% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 67.6% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 66.5% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 65.3% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 64.4% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 54% | 63.5% |
| 1967 | 53% | 63% |
| 1966 | 52% | 62.5% |
| 1965 | 51% | 62% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 61.5% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 61% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 60.6% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 60.1% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 59.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sao Paulo | 11.5M |
| Rio de Janeiro | 6.21M |
| Brasilia | 2.82M |
| Fortaleza | 2.43M |
| Salvador | 2.42M |
| Belo Horizonte | 2.32M |
| Manaus | 2.06M |
| Curitiba | 1.77M |
| Recife | 1.49M |
| Goiania | 1.44M |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons