Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 202.3 people in Ireland. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 139,638 sq ft in Ireland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Ireland are ranked 164th and 112th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for Ireland, hence the population density in Brazil is 67.5% lower than in Ireland.
Population density comparison
Brazil
|
Ireland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 202.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 112/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
5474763
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 26,599 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 137,823 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 35.2% |
| Urban population | 88% | 64.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs Ireland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 32.2% growth in Ireland.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. Ireland was 115th in 2004 and ranks 112th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Ireland
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 202.3 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 199.5 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 196 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 192.1 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 189.5 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 187.1 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 184.1 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 181.5 |
| 2016 | 63 | 179.1 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 176.8 |
| 2014 | 62 | 175.1 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 173.8 |
| 2012 | 61 | 172.9 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 172.2 |
| 2010 | 60 | 171.4 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 170.5 |
| 2008 | 59 | 168.8 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 165.4 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 160.7 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 156.4 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 153 |
| 2003 | 56 | 150.3 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 147.8 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 145.4 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 143.1 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 141.2 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 139.6 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 138.1 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 136.8 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 135.7 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 135 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 134.5 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 133.8 |
| 1991 | 47 | 132.9 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 132.1 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 132 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 132.5 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 133.1 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 133.1 |
| 1985 | 42 | 133 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 132.8 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 132 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 131.1 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 129.8 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 128.3 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 126.8 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 125.2 |
| 1977 | 35 | 123.4 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 121.7 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 119.9 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 118 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 116 |
| 1972 | 31 | 114.2 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 112.5 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 111.2 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 110.3 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 109.6 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 109.1 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 108.6 |
| 1965 | 26 | 108.2 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 107.8 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 107.2 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 106.6 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 106.2 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Ireland
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 64.8% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 64.5% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 64.2% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 63.9% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 63.7% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 63.4% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 63.2% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 62.9% |
| 2016 | 86% | 62.7% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 62.5% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 62.3% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 62.1% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 61.9% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 61.7% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 61.5% |
| 2009 | 84% | 61.3% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 61.1% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 60.9% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 60.7% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 60.5% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 60.2% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 59.9% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 59.6% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 59.4% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 59.2% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 58.9% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 58.7% |
| 1997 | 79% | 58.4% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 58.2% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 57.9% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 57.7% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 57.5% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 57.3% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 57.1% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 56.9% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 56.8% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 56.7% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 56.6% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 56.4% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 56.3% |
| 1984 | 69% | 56.1% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 56% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 55.8% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 55.6% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 55.3% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 55% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 54.7% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 54.3% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 54% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 53.6% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 53.3% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 53% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 52.6% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 52.3% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 51.3% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 50.1% |
| 1968 | 54% | 49% |
| 1967 | 53% | 47.8% |
| 1966 | 52% | 46.6% |
| 1965 | 51% | 46.2% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 46% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 45.6% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 45.4% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 45.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 60.2% to 64.8% in Ireland.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
