Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 227.4 people in Brunei. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 134,114 sq ft in Brunei. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Brunei are ranked 164th and 101st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.006% of the population and 0.004% of the land area for Brunei, hence the population density in Brazil is 71.1% lower than in Brunei.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 227.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 101/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
469088
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 2,035 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 122,592 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 20.6% |
| Urban population | 88% | 79.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs Brunei:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 31.1% growth in Brunei.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. Brunei was 101st in 2004 and still ranks 101st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 227.4 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 225.6 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 223.8 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 222 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 219.9 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 217.6 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 215.2 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 212.7 |
| 2016 | 63 | 210.1 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 207.5 |
| 2014 | 62 | 204.8 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 202.1 |
| 2012 | 61 | 199.3 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 196.3 |
| 2010 | 60 | 192.8 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 189.2 |
| 2008 | 59 | 185.7 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 182.3 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 179.2 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 176.4 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 173.4 |
| 2003 | 56 | 170.4 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 167.1 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 163.8 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 160.4 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 157 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 153.5 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 150.1 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 146.6 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 143.1 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 139.6 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 136.1 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 132.6 |
| 1991 | 47 | 129.1 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 125.5 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 121.9 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 118.4 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 114.9 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 111.3 |
| 1985 | 42 | 107.6 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 104 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 100.6 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 97.4 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 94.3 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 91.5 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 88.7 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 85.9 |
| 1977 | 35 | 83.2 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 80.4 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 77.7 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 75 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 72.4 |
| 1972 | 31 | 69.9 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 67.8 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 66.4 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 64.6 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 62 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 59.5 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 56.9 |
| 1965 | 26 | 54.5 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 52.1 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 49.7 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 47.5 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 45.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 79.4% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 79.1% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 78.9% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 78.6% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 78.3% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 77.9% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 77.6% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 77.3% |
| 2016 | 86% | 77% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 76.7% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 76.3% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 76% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 75.7% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 75.3% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 75% |
| 2009 | 84% | 74.6% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 74.3% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 73.9% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 73.2% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 72.8% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 72.4% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 72% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 71.7% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 71.2% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 70.7% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 70.2% |
| 1997 | 79% | 69.7% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 69.2% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 68.6% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 68.1% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 67.6% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 67.1% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 66.6% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 66.4% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 66.3% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 66.1% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 66% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 65.8% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 65.7% |
| 1984 | 69% | 65.5% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 65.4% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 65.2% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 65.1% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 64.9% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 64.8% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 64.6% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 64.5% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 64.3% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 64% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 63.9% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 63.7% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 63.4% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 61.7% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 54% | 58.1% |
| 1967 | 53% | 56.3% |
| 1966 | 52% | 54.5% |
| 1965 | 51% | 52.6% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 50.8% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 48.9% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 47.1% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 45.2% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 43.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 72.8% to 79.4% in Brunei.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sao Paulo | 11.5M |
| Rio de Janeiro | 6.21M |
| Brasilia | 2.82M |
| Fortaleza | 2.43M |
| Salvador | 2.42M |
| Belo Horizonte | 2.32M |
| Manaus | 2.06M |
| Curitiba | 1.77M |
| Recife | 1.49M |
| Goiania | 1.44M |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kuala Belait | 70K |
| Bandar Seri Begawan | 50K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons