Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 1,467 people in San Marino. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 19,388 sq ft in San Marino. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and San Marino are ranked 164th and 15th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0004% of the population and 0.00004% of the land area for San Marino, hence the population density in Brazil is 95.5% lower than in San Marino.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 1,467 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 15/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
33996
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 23.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 19,008 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 2.07% |
| Urban population | 88% | 97.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs San Marino:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 15.3% growth in San Marino.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. San Marino was 14th in 2004 and ranks 15th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 1,467 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 1,462 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 1,457 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 1,479 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 1,501 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 1,496 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 1,490 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 1,460 |
| 2016 | 63 | 1,429 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 1,420 |
| 2014 | 62 | 1,410 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 1,426 |
| 2012 | 61 | 1,445 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 1,408 |
| 2010 | 60 | 1,436 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 1,427 |
| 2008 | 59 | 1,367 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 1,347 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 1,303 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 1,288 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 1,272 |
| 2003 | 56 | 1,202 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 1,187 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 1,172 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 1,157 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 1,142 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 1,128 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 1,114 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 1,100 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 1,086 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 1,072 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 1,056 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 1,041 |
| 1991 | 47 | 1,027 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 1,013 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 999 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 986 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 979 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 977 |
| 1985 | 42 | 971 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 965 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 960 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 952 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 943 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 932 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 920 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 908 |
| 1977 | 35 | 864 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 825 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 822 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 821 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 820 |
| 1972 | 31 | 811 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 795 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 784 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 778 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 771 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 764 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 756 |
| 1965 | 26 | 747 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 733 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 716 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 699 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 682 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 97.9% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 97.8% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 97.7% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 97.6% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 97.5% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 97.4% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 97.2% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 97.1% |
| 2016 | 86% | 96.9% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 96.7% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 96.6% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 96.4% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 96.2% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 96% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 95.7% |
| 2009 | 84% | 95.5% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 95.3% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 95% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 94.7% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 94.5% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 94.2% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 94% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 93.9% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 93.8% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 93.4% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 93.1% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 92.8% |
| 1997 | 79% | 92.4% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 92.1% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 91.7% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 91.3% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 90.8% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 90.4% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 90.4% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 90.4% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 90.4% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 90.4% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 90.4% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 89.4% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 88.3% |
| 1984 | 69% | 87.1% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 85.8% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 84.4% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 82.9% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 81.2% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 79.5% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 77.6% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 75.6% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 73.6% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 71.5% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 69.3% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 67% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 64.7% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 62.3% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 59.8% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 58.7% |
| 1968 | 54% | 57.7% |
| 1967 | 53% | 56.6% |
| 1966 | 52% | 55.5% |
| 1965 | 51% | 54.4% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 53.3% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 52.2% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 51.1% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 50% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 48.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 94.2% to 97.9% in San Marino.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons