Brazil has a population density of 66.2 people per square mile compared to 22,064 people in Singapore. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 1,282 sq ft in Singapore. Brazil and Singapore rank 164th and 2nd by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.61% of the world's population and 5.61% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Singapore, making the population density in Brazil 99.7% lower than in Singapore.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Brazil
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2026 | 66.2 | 22,064 |
| 2025 | 66 | 21,926 |
| 2024 | 65.7 | 21,776 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 21,346 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 20,334 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 19,672 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 20,510 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 20,632 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 20,454 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 20,415 |
| 2016 | 63 | 20,483 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 20,219 |
| 2014 | 62 | 19,981 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 19,779 |
| 2012 | 61 | 19,489 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 19,071 |
| 2010 | 60 | 18,730 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 18,454 |
| 2008 | 59 | 17,906 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 17,100 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 16,426 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 16,035 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 15,663 |
| 2003 | 56 | 15,513 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 16,023 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 15,996 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 15,570 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 15,303 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 15,181 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 14,674 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 14,190 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 13,625 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 13,217 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 12,809 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 12,489 |
| 1991 | 47 | 12,119 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 11,779 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 11,330 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 11,002 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 10,726 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 10,566 |
| 1985 | 42 | 10,576 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 10,562 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 10,364 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 10,230 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 9,791 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 9,331 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 9,214 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 9,098 |
| 1977 | 35 | 8,989 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 8,865 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 8,746 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 8,620 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 8,477 |
| 1972 | 31 | 8,320 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 8,168 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 8,019 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 7,896 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 7,778 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 7,645 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 7,478 |
| 1965 | 26 | 7,294 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 7,119 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 6,939 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 6,766 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 6,581 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/brazil/singapore | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Brazil increased by 14.5%, compared to a 34.3% growth in Singapore.
In 2006, Brazil ranked 154th by population density and is 164th now. Singapore was 2nd in 2006 and still ranks 2nd out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Brazil
|
Singapore
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 66.2 ppl/mi² | 22,064 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 2/197 |
| Population |
213824938
|
6125852
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 277.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 1,280 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12.1% | 0% |
| Urban population | 87.9% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.3% | 95.8% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2024 | 87.9% | 100% |
| 2023 | 87.6% | 100% |
| 2022 | 87.3% | 100% |
| 2021 | 87.1% | 100% |
| 2020 | 86.9% | 100% |
| 2019 | 86.7% | 100% |
| 2018 | 86.4% | 100% |
| 2017 | 86.2% | 100% |
| 2016 | 85.9% | 100% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 100% |
| 2014 | 85.4% | 100% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 100% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 100% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 100% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 100% |
| 2009 | 84.1% | 100% |
| 2008 | 83.8% | 100% |
| 2007 | 83.5% | 100% |
| 2006 | 83.3% | 100% |
| 2005 | 83% | 100% |
| 2004 | 82.7% | 100% |
| 2003 | 82.4% | 100% |
| 2002 | 82% | 100% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 100% |
| 2000 | 81.1% | 100% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 100% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 100% |
| 1997 | 79% | 100% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 100% |
| 1995 | 77.7% | 100% |
| 1994 | 77.2% | 100% |
| 1993 | 76.6% | 100% |
| 1992 | 76.1% | 100% |
| 1991 | 75.5% | 100% |
| 1990 | 74.9% | 100% |
| 1989 | 74.2% | 100% |
| 1988 | 73.6% | 100% |
| 1987 | 73% | 100% |
| 1986 | 72.3% | 100% |
| 1985 | 71.6% | 100% |
| 1984 | 70.9% | 100% |
| 1983 | 70.1% | 100% |
| 1982 | 69.3% | 100% |
| 1981 | 68.4% | 100% |
| 1980 | 67.4% | 100% |
| 1979 | 66.3% | 100% |
| 1978 | 65% | 100% |
| 1977 | 63.5% | 100% |
| 1976 | 61.9% | 100% |
| 1975 | 60.3% | 100% |
| 1974 | 58.7% | 100% |
| 1973 | 57.1% | 100% |
| 1972 | 55.7% | 100% |
| 1971 | 54.3% | 100% |
| 1970 | 53.2% | 100% |
| 1969 | 52.2% | 100% |
| 1968 | 51.2% | 100% |
| 1967 | 50.3% | 100% |
| 1966 | 49.5% | 100% |
| 1965 | 48.7% | 100% |
| 1964 | 47.9% | 100% |
| 1963 | 47.1% | 100% |
| 1962 | 46.3% | 100% |
| 1961 | 45.5% | 100% |
| 1960 | 44.7% | 100% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/brazil/singapore | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 82.7% to 87.9% in Brazil and from 100% to 100% in Singapore.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/brazil/singapore | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2018–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.