Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 69.9 people in Sudan. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 392,733 sq ft in Sudan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Sudan are ranked 164th and 159th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.62% of the population and 1.25% of the land area for Sudan, hence the population density in Brazil is 6.08% lower than in Sudan.
Population density comparison
Brazil
|
Sudan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 69.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 159/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
52963918
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 721,239 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 398,561 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 63.2% |
| Urban population | 88% | 36.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 16.2% |
Brazil vs Sudan:
Population density chart by year
From 2012 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 7.68%, compared to a 36.6% growth in Sudan.
In 2012, Brazil ranked 156th for population density and is in 164th place now. Sudan was 164th in 2012 and ranks 159th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sudan
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 69.9 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 69.4 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 68.5 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 66.6 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 64.9 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 63.2 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 61.3 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 59.2 |
| 2016 | 63 | 57.2 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 55.5 |
| 2014 | 62 | 53.8 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 52.4 |
| 2012 | 61 | 51.2 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | - |
| 2010 | 60 | - |
| 2009 | 59.5 | - |
| 2008 | 59 | - |
| 2007 | 58.4 | - |
| 2006 | 57.8 | - |
| 2005 | 57.2 | - |
| 2004 | 56.6 | - |
| 2003 | 56 | - |
| 2002 | 55.3 | - |
| 2001 | 54.6 | - |
| 2000 | 53.9 | - |
| 1999 | 53.2 | - |
| 1998 | 52.4 | - |
| 1997 | 51.6 | - |
| 1996 | 50.9 | - |
| 1995 | 50.1 | - |
| 1994 | 49.4 | - |
| 1993 | 48.6 | - |
| 1992 | 47.8 | - |
| 1991 | 47 | - |
| 1990 | 46.2 | - |
| 1989 | 45.4 | - |
| 1988 | 44.6 | - |
| 1987 | 43.7 | - |
| 1986 | 42.9 | - |
| 1985 | 42 | - |
| 1984 | 41.1 | - |
| 1983 | 40.2 | - |
| 1982 | 39.3 | - |
| 1981 | 38.4 | - |
| 1980 | 37.6 | - |
| 1979 | 36.7 | - |
| 1978 | 35.8 | - |
| 1977 | 35 | - |
| 1976 | 34.2 | - |
| 1975 | 33.3 | - |
| 1974 | 32.6 | - |
| 1973 | 31.8 | - |
| 1972 | 31 | - |
| 1971 | 30.3 | - |
| 1970 | 29.6 | - |
| 1969 | 28.8 | - |
| 1968 | 28.1 | - |
| 1967 | 27.4 | - |
| 1966 | 26.7 | - |
| 1965 | 26 | - |
| 1964 | 25.3 | - |
| 1963 | 24.5 | - |
| 1962 | 23.8 | - |
| 1961 | 23.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Sudan
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 36.8% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 36.3% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 36% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 35.6% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 35.3% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 34.9% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 34.6% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 34.4% |
| 2016 | 86% | 34.1% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 33.9% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 33.7% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 33.5% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 33.3% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 33.2% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 33.1% |
| 2009 | 84% | 33% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 32.9% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 32.9% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 32.8% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 32.8% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 32.7% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 32.7% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 32.6% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 32.5% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 32.5% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 32.4% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 32.4% |
| 1997 | 79% | 32.3% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 32.3% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 32.2% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 32.2% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 32.1% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 31.1% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 29.8% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 28.6% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 27.4% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 26.2% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 25.1% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 24% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 22.9% |
| 1984 | 69% | 21.9% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 20.9% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 20.4% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 20.2% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 20% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 19.8% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 19.5% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 19.3% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 19.1% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 18.9% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 18.7% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 18.5% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 17.9% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 17.2% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 16.5% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 15.8% |
| 1968 | 54% | 15.2% |
| 1967 | 53% | 14.6% |
| 1966 | 52% | 14% |
| 1965 | 51% | 13.4% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 12.8% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 12.3% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 11.7% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 11.2% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 10.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 32.7% to 36.8% in Sudan.
Densely populated cities
|
Brazil
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sao Paulo | 11.5M |
| Rio de Janeiro | 6.21M |
| Brasilia | 2.82M |
| Fortaleza | 2.43M |
| Salvador | 2.42M |
| Belo Horizonte | 2.32M |
| Manaus | 2.06M |
| Curitiba | 1.77M |
| Recife | 1.49M |
| Goiania | 1.44M |
|
Sudan
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Khartoum | 5.34M |
| Omdurman | 2.81M |
| Khartoum North | 936K |
| Port Sudan | 580K |
| El-Obeid | 560K |
| Kassala | 536K |
| Kosti | 528K |
| Nyala | 493K |
| El-Gadarif | 355K |
| Al-Fashir | 286K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
