Costa Rica has a population density of 260.2 people per square mile compared to 387 people in Denmark. Costa Rica has 107,389 sq ft of land per person vs 77,304 sq ft in Denmark. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Costa Rica and Denmark are ranked 91st and 66th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Costa Rica has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Denmark, hence the population density in Costa Rica is 32.8% lower than in Denmark.
Population density comparison
Costa Rica
|
Denmark
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 260.2 ppl/mi² | 387 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 91/197 | 66/197 |
| Population |
5170484
|
6018959
|
| Land area | 19,714 sq mi | 15,444 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 107,137 sq ft | 72,036 sq ft |
| Rural population | 16.8% | 11.4% |
| Urban population | 83.2% | 88.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Costa Rica vs Denmark:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Costa Rica increased by 22.1%, compared to a 10.6% growth in Denmark.
In 2004, Costa Rica ranked 88th for population density and is in 91st place now. Denmark was 57th in 2004 and ranks 66th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Costa Rica
|
Denmark
|
|
| 2024 | 260.2 | 387 |
| 2023 | 259 | 385 |
| 2022 | 257.8 | 382 |
| 2021 | 256.7 | 379 |
| 2020 | 255.4 | 378 |
| 2019 | 253.6 | 376 |
| 2018 | 251.5 | 375 |
| 2017 | 249.2 | 373 |
| 2016 | 246.9 | 371 |
| 2015 | 244.4 | 368 |
| 2014 | 241.8 | 365 |
| 2013 | 239.2 | 364 |
| 2012 | 236.6 | 362 |
| 2011 | 233.8 | 361 |
| 2010 | 231.1 | 359 |
| 2009 | 228.2 | 358 |
| 2008 | 225.2 | 356 |
| 2007 | 222.2 | 354 |
| 2006 | 219.2 | 352 |
| 2005 | 216.1 | 351 |
| 2004 | 213 | 350 |
| 2003 | 209.9 | 349 |
| 2002 | 206.7 | 348 |
| 2001 | 203.4 | 347 |
| 2000 | 199.7 | 346 |
| 1999 | 195.9 | 345 |
| 1998 | 191.9 | 343 |
| 1997 | 187.8 | 342 |
| 1996 | 183.6 | 341 |
| 1995 | 179.3 | 339 |
| 1994 | 175.1 | 337 |
| 1993 | 170.8 | 336 |
| 1992 | 166.6 | 335 |
| 1991 | 162.4 | 334 |
| 1990 | 158.3 | 333 |
| 1989 | 154.4 | 332 |
| 1988 | 150.6 | 332 |
| 1987 | 146.7 | 332 |
| 1986 | 142.9 | 332 |
| 1985 | 139.1 | 331 |
| 1984 | 135.3 | 331 |
| 1983 | 131.6 | 331 |
| 1982 | 128.1 | 331 |
| 1981 | 124.6 | 332 |
| 1980 | 121.3 | 332 |
| 1979 | 118 | 331 |
| 1978 | 114.9 | 330 |
| 1977 | 111.8 | 329 |
| 1976 | 108.9 | 328 |
| 1975 | 106.2 | 328 |
| 1974 | 103.5 | 327 |
| 1973 | 100.9 | 325 |
| 1972 | 98.3 | 323 |
| 1971 | 95.8 | 321 |
| 1970 | 93.3 | 319 |
| 1969 | 90.8 | 317 |
| 1968 | 88.2 | 315 |
| 1967 | 85.7 | 313 |
| 1966 | 83.1 | 311 |
| 1965 | 80.5 | 308 |
| 1964 | 77.8 | 306 |
| 1963 | 75.2 | 303 |
| 1962 | 72.5 | 301 |
| 1961 | 69.9 | 298.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Costa Rica
|
Denmark
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2% | 88.6% |
| 2023 | 82.6% | 88.5% |
| 2022 | 82% | 88.4% |
| 2021 | 81.4% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 80.8% | 88.1% |
| 2019 | 80.1% | 88% |
| 2018 | 79.3% | 87.9% |
| 2017 | 78.6% | 87.8% |
| 2016 | 77.7% | 87.6% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 87.5% |
| 2014 | 75.9% | 87.4% |
| 2013 | 75% | 87.3% |
| 2012 | 73.9% | 87.1% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 87% |
| 2010 | 71.7% | 86.8% |
| 2009 | 70.6% | 86.7% |
| 2008 | 69.4% | 86.5% |
| 2007 | 68.2% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 66.9% | 86.1% |
| 2005 | 65.7% | 85.9% |
| 2004 | 64.4% | 85.6% |
| 2003 | 63.1% | 85.4% |
| 2002 | 61.8% | 85.2% |
| 2001 | 60.4% | 85.2% |
| 2000 | 59.1% | 85.1% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 85.1% |
| 1998 | 57.3% | 85.1% |
| 1997 | 56.4% | 85% |
| 1996 | 55.5% | 85% |
| 1995 | 54.6% | 85% |
| 1994 | 53.7% | 85% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 84.9% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 84.9% |
| 1991 | 50.9% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 50% | 84.8% |
| 1989 | 49.1% | 84.8% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 84.7% |
| 1987 | 47.3% | 84.6% |
| 1986 | 46.4% | 84.5% |
| 1985 | 45.4% | 84.4% |
| 1984 | 44.5% | 84.2% |
| 1983 | 44.2% | 84.1% |
| 1982 | 43.8% | 84% |
| 1981 | 43.5% | 83.9% |
| 1980 | 43.1% | 83.7% |
| 1979 | 42.7% | 83.4% |
| 1978 | 42.4% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 42% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 41.7% | 82.6% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 82.1% |
| 1974 | 41% | 81.7% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 81.2% |
| 1972 | 40.1% | 80.7% |
| 1971 | 39.4% | 80.2% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 79.7% |
| 1969 | 38.2% | 79.2% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 78.7% |
| 1967 | 37% | 78.2% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 77.6% |
| 1965 | 35.8% | 77% |
| 1964 | 35.2% | 76.4% |
| 1963 | 34.6% | 75.8% |
| 1962 | 34.4% | 75.1% |
| 1961 | 34.3% | 74.4% |
| 1960 | 34.3% | 73.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica and from 85.6% to 88.6% in Denmark.
Densely populated cities
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
