The Central African Republic has a population density of 22.2 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. The Central African Republic has 1,257,950 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Central African Republic and Costa Rica are ranked 186th and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Central African Republic has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.42% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in the Central African Republic is 91.5% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 22.2 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 186/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
5662456
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 240,534 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,257,942 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 55.9% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 44.1% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
the Central African Republic vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Central African Republic increased by 27.1%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, the Central African Republic ranked 180th for population density and is in 186th place now. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 22.2 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 21.4 | 259 |
| 2022 | 21.2 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 21.3 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 20.9 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 20.6 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 20.3 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 19.9 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 19.6 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 19.2 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 19.2 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 19.3 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 19.2 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 19 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 18.7 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 18.8 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 19 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 18.6 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 18.2 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 17.8 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 17.4 | 213 |
| 2003 | 17.1 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 16.7 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 16.3 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 15.9 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 15.5 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 15.1 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 14.7 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 14.3 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 13.9 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 13.5 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 13.1 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 12.7 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 12.3 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 11.9 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 11.6 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 11.3 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 11.1 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 11 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 10.8 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 10.7 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 10.5 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 10.4 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 10.3 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 10.2 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 10.1 | 118 |
| 1978 | 9.97 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 9.87 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 9.76 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 9.62 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 9.43 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 9.25 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 9.08 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 8.9 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 8.72 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 8.53 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 8.34 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 8.15 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 7.97 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 7.81 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 7.65 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 7.5 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 7.35 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 7.21 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 44.1% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 43.6% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 43.1% | 82% |
| 2021 | 42.6% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 42.2% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 41.8% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 41.4% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 41% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 40.6% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 40.3% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 40% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 39.7% | 75% |
| 2012 | 39.4% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 39.1% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 38.9% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 38.7% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 38.5% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 38.3% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 38.2% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 38.1% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 38% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 37.9% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 37.8% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 37.7% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 37.6% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 37.6% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 37.5% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 37.4% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 37.3% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 37.2% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 37.1% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 37.1% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 37% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 36.9% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 36.8% | 50% |
| 1989 | 36.7% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 36.5% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 36.2% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 35.9% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 35.5% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 35.2% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 34.9% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 34.5% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 34.2% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 33.9% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 33.5% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 33.2% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 32.9% | 42% |
| 1976 | 32.6% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 32% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 31% | 41% |
| 1973 | 30.1% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 29.2% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 28.4% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 27.5% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 26.6% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 25.8% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 25% | 37% |
| 1966 | 24.3% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 23.5% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 22.8% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 22.1% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 21.4% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 20.8% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 20.1% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 38% to 44.1% in the Central African Republic and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons