Australia has a population density of 9.16 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. Australia has 3,043,442 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Australia and Costa Rica are ranked 196th and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in Australia is 96.5% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
Australia
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.16 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
27677455
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,043,440 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 13.2% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 86.8% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 62.6% | 0% |
Australia vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Australia increased by 36.3%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, Australia ranked 190th for population density and is in 196th place now. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Costa Rica
|
|
| 2024 | 9.16 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 8.97 | 259 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 7.31 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 7.16 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 7.02 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 6.89 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 6.8 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 6.72 | 213 |
| 2003 | 6.65 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 6.57 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 6.5 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 6.42 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 6.34 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 6.27 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 6.21 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 6.14 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 6.07 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 6 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 5.95 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 5.89 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 5.83 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 5.75 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 5.67 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 5.57 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 5.48 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 5.4 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 5.32 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 5.25 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 5.19 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 5.12 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 5.03 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 4.95 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 4.89 | 118 |
| 1978 | 4.84 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 4.78 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 4.73 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 4.68 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 4.63 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 4.51 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 4.44 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 4.36 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 4.22 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 4.13 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 4.05 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 3.98 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 3.93 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 3.84 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 3.76 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 3.69 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 3.62 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 3.53 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Costa Rica
|
|
| 2024 | 86.8% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 86.6% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 86.5% | 82% |
| 2021 | 86.4% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 86.2% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 86.1% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 86% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 85.9% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 85.8% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 85.6% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 85.5% | 75% |
| 2012 | 85.4% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 85.2% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 85.1% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 84.9% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 84.8% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 84.7% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 84.6% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 84.5% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 84.3% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 84.2% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 84.2% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 84.4% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 84.5% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 84.6% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 84.9% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 85% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 85.2% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 85.3% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 50% |
| 1989 | 85.5% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 85.5% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 85.5% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 85.6% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 85.6% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 85.6% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 85.6% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 85.7% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 85.6% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 85.4% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 85.3% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 85.1% | 42% |
| 1976 | 84.9% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 84.8% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 84.6% | 41% |
| 1973 | 84.5% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 84.3% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 84.2% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 84% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 83.8% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 83.7% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 83.5% | 37% |
| 1966 | 83.3% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 83.1% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 82.8% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 81.5% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.5% to 86.8% in Australia and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
