Angola has a population density of 78.7 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. Angola has 354,205 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Angola and Costa Rica are ranked 153rd and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Angola has 0.47% of the world's population and 0.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in Angola is 69.8% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 78.7 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 153/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
39983997
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 481,354 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 354,205 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30.7% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 69.3% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.57% | 0% |
Angola vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Angola increased by 103.7%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, Angola ranked 164th for population density and is in 153rd place now. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 78.7 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 76.3 | 259 |
| 2022 | 74 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 71.7 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 69.5 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 67.3 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 65 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 62.8 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 60.6 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 58.5 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 56.4 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 54.4 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 52.3 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 50.3 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 48.4 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 46.6 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 44.8 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 43.2 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 41.6 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 40.1 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 38.6 | 213 |
| 2003 | 37.3 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 36 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 34.8 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 33.6 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 32.5 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 31.5 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 30.5 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 29.4 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 28.5 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 27.5 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 26.6 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 25.8 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 25 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 24.2 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 23.3 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 22.6 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 21.8 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 21.1 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 20.3 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 19.6 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 18.9 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 18.2 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 17.5 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 16.9 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 16.3 | 118 |
| 1978 | 15.7 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 15.2 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 14.7 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 14.2 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 13.7 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 13.3 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 12.8 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 12.4 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 12.2 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 12 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 11.8 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 11.7 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 11.6 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 11.5 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 11.4 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 11.2 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 11.1 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 11 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 69.3% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 68.1% | 82% |
| 2021 | 67.5% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 66.8% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 66.2% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 65.5% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 64.8% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 63.4% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 62.7% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 62% | 75% |
| 2012 | 61.3% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 60.5% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 59.8% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 59% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 58.3% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 57.5% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 56.8% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 56% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 54.8% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 53.6% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 52.5% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 51.3% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 50.1% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 48.9% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 47.7% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 46.5% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 45.3% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 44.2% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 43% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 41.5% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 40% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 38.6% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 37.1% | 50% |
| 1989 | 35.7% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 34.3% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 33% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 31.6% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 30.3% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 29.1% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 27.8% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 26.6% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 25.4% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 24.3% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 23.2% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 22.1% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 42% |
| 1976 | 20.1% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 19.1% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 18.2% | 41% |
| 1973 | 17.3% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 16.5% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 15.6% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 15% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 14.4% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 13.9% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 13.4% | 37% |
| 1966 | 13% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 12.5% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 12.1% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 11.6% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 11.2% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 10.8% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 10.4% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 54.8% to 69.3% in Angola and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons