Costa Rica has a population density of 260.2 people per square mile compared to 199.4 people in Lesotho. Costa Rica has 107,389 sq ft of land per person vs 139,786 sq ft in Lesotho. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Costa Rica and Lesotho are ranked 91st and 114th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Costa Rica has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.02% of the land area for Lesotho, hence the population density in Costa Rica is 30.5% higher than in Lesotho.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 260.2 ppl/mi² | 199.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 91/197 | 114/197 |
| Population |
5170484
|
2384217
|
| Land area | 19,714 sq mi | 11,722 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 107,137 sq ft | 139,809 sq ft |
| Rural population | 16.8% | 69.1% |
| Urban population | 83.2% | 30.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Costa Rica vs Lesotho:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Costa Rica increased by 22.1%, compared to a 18.6% growth in Lesotho.
In 2004, Costa Rica ranked 88th for population density and is in 91st place now. Lesotho was 107th in 2004 and ranks 114th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 260.2 | 199.4 |
| 2023 | 259 | 197.2 |
| 2022 | 257.8 | 195 |
| 2021 | 256.7 | 192.9 |
| 2020 | 255.4 | 190.7 |
| 2019 | 253.6 | 188.5 |
| 2018 | 251.5 | 186.3 |
| 2017 | 249.2 | 184 |
| 2016 | 246.9 | 181.7 |
| 2015 | 244.4 | 179.5 |
| 2014 | 241.8 | 177.5 |
| 2013 | 239.2 | 175.4 |
| 2012 | 236.6 | 173.5 |
| 2011 | 233.8 | 171.8 |
| 2010 | 231.1 | 170.3 |
| 2009 | 228.2 | 169 |
| 2008 | 225.2 | 167.8 |
| 2007 | 222.2 | 166.6 |
| 2006 | 219.2 | 165.9 |
| 2005 | 216.1 | 166.6 |
| 2004 | 213 | 168.2 |
| 2003 | 209.9 | 169.3 |
| 2002 | 206.7 | 170.2 |
| 2001 | 203.4 | 170.7 |
| 2000 | 199.7 | 171 |
| 1999 | 195.9 | 170.9 |
| 1998 | 191.9 | 170.5 |
| 1997 | 187.8 | 169.6 |
| 1996 | 183.6 | 168.3 |
| 1995 | 179.3 | 166.5 |
| 1994 | 175.1 | 164.5 |
| 1993 | 170.8 | 162.2 |
| 1992 | 166.6 | 159.8 |
| 1991 | 162.4 | 157.2 |
| 1990 | 158.3 | 154.4 |
| 1989 | 154.4 | 151.5 |
| 1988 | 150.6 | 148.4 |
| 1987 | 146.7 | 145.3 |
| 1986 | 142.9 | 142.1 |
| 1985 | 139.1 | 138.6 |
| 1984 | 135.3 | 134.7 |
| 1983 | 131.6 | 130.9 |
| 1982 | 128.1 | 127.2 |
| 1981 | 124.6 | 123.5 |
| 1980 | 121.3 | 120 |
| 1979 | 118 | 116.5 |
| 1978 | 114.9 | 113.2 |
| 1977 | 111.8 | 110 |
| 1976 | 108.9 | 106.9 |
| 1975 | 106.2 | 103.5 |
| 1974 | 103.5 | 100 |
| 1973 | 100.9 | 96.6 |
| 1972 | 98.3 | 93.3 |
| 1971 | 95.8 | 90.1 |
| 1970 | 93.3 | 87 |
| 1969 | 90.8 | 83.9 |
| 1968 | 88.2 | 80.9 |
| 1967 | 85.7 | 78 |
| 1966 | 83.1 | 75.2 |
| 1965 | 80.5 | 72.9 |
| 1964 | 77.8 | 70.8 |
| 1963 | 75.2 | 68.7 |
| 1962 | 72.5 | 66.7 |
| 1961 | 69.9 | 64.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2% | 30.9% |
| 2023 | 82.6% | 30.4% |
| 2022 | 82% | 29.9% |
| 2021 | 81.4% | 29.5% |
| 2020 | 80.8% | 29% |
| 2019 | 80.1% | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 79.3% | 28.2% |
| 2017 | 78.6% | 27.7% |
| 2016 | 77.7% | 27.3% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 26.9% |
| 2014 | 75.9% | 26.5% |
| 2013 | 75% | 26.1% |
| 2012 | 73.9% | 25.7% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 25.3% |
| 2010 | 71.7% | 24.8% |
| 2009 | 70.6% | 24.3% |
| 2008 | 69.4% | 23.8% |
| 2007 | 68.2% | 23.3% |
| 2006 | 66.9% | 22.8% |
| 2005 | 65.7% | 22.2% |
| 2004 | 64.4% | 21.7% |
| 2003 | 63.1% | 21.1% |
| 2002 | 61.8% | 20.6% |
| 2001 | 60.4% | 20.1% |
| 2000 | 59.1% | 19.5% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 19% |
| 1998 | 57.3% | 18.5% |
| 1997 | 56.4% | 18% |
| 1996 | 55.5% | 17.6% |
| 1995 | 54.6% | 17% |
| 1994 | 53.7% | 16.3% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 15.7% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 15.1% |
| 1991 | 50.9% | 14.5% |
| 1990 | 50% | 14% |
| 1989 | 49.1% | 13.4% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 12.9% |
| 1987 | 47.3% | 12.4% |
| 1986 | 46.4% | 11.9% |
| 1985 | 45.4% | 11.8% |
| 1984 | 44.5% | 11.7% |
| 1983 | 44.2% | 11.6% |
| 1982 | 43.8% | 11.6% |
| 1981 | 43.5% | 11.5% |
| 1980 | 43.1% | 11.5% |
| 1979 | 42.7% | 11.4% |
| 1978 | 42.4% | 11.3% |
| 1977 | 42% | 11.3% |
| 1976 | 41.7% | 11.2% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 10.8% |
| 1974 | 41% | 10.4% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 9.91% |
| 1972 | 40.1% | 9.47% |
| 1971 | 39.4% | 9.04% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 8.61% |
| 1969 | 38.2% | 8.2% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 7.8% |
| 1967 | 37% | 7.42% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 7.06% |
| 1965 | 35.8% | 6.37% |
| 1964 | 35.2% | 5.66% |
| 1963 | 34.6% | 5.03% |
| 1962 | 34.4% | 4.46% |
| 1961 | 34.3% | 3.96% |
| 1960 | 34.3% | 3.51% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica and from 21.7% to 30.9% in Lesotho.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Maseru | 344K |
| Teyateyaneng | 75.1K |
| Mafeteng | 57.1K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons