Bhutan has a population density of 53.8 people per square mile compared to 260.2 people in Costa Rica. Bhutan has 522,119 sq ft of land per person vs 107,389 sq ft in Costa Rica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bhutan and Costa Rica are ranked 167th and 91st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bhutan has 0.01% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.06% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Costa Rica, hence the population density in Bhutan is 79.3% lower than in Costa Rica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 53.8 ppl/mi² | 260.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 167/197 | 91/197 |
| Population |
801123
|
5170484
|
| Land area | 14,726 sq mi | 19,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 518,665 sq ft | 107,137 sq ft |
| Rural population | 55% | 16.8% |
| Urban population | 45% | 83.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Bhutan vs Costa Rica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bhutan increased by 21.6%, compared to a 22.1% growth in Costa Rica.
In 2004, Bhutan ranked 158th for population density and is in 167th place now. Costa Rica was 88th in 2004 and ranks 91st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 53.8 | 260.2 |
| 2023 | 53.4 | 259 |
| 2022 | 53 | 257.8 |
| 2021 | 52.7 | 256.7 |
| 2020 | 52.3 | 255.4 |
| 2019 | 51.9 | 253.6 |
| 2018 | 51.6 | 251.5 |
| 2017 | 51.2 | 249.2 |
| 2016 | 50.8 | 246.9 |
| 2015 | 50.3 | 244.4 |
| 2014 | 49.8 | 241.8 |
| 2013 | 49.3 | 239.2 |
| 2012 | 48.7 | 236.6 |
| 2011 | 48.2 | 233.8 |
| 2010 | 47.7 | 231.1 |
| 2009 | 47.2 | 228.2 |
| 2008 | 46.6 | 225.2 |
| 2007 | 46.1 | 222.2 |
| 2006 | 45.6 | 219.2 |
| 2005 | 45 | 216.1 |
| 2004 | 44.2 | 213 |
| 2003 | 41.5 | 209.9 |
| 2002 | 40.6 | 206.7 |
| 2001 | 39.7 | 203.4 |
| 2000 | 38.8 | 199.7 |
| 1999 | 37.9 | 195.9 |
| 1998 | 37.1 | 191.9 |
| 1997 | 36.4 | 187.8 |
| 1996 | 35.7 | 183.6 |
| 1995 | 35.7 | 179.3 |
| 1994 | 36.1 | 175.1 |
| 1993 | 30.7 | 170.8 |
| 1992 | 32 | 166.6 |
| 1991 | 33.2 | 162.4 |
| 1990 | 32.7 | 158.3 |
| 1989 | 31.8 | 154.4 |
| 1988 | 30.9 | 150.6 |
| 1987 | 30 | 146.7 |
| 1986 | 29.1 | 142.9 |
| 1985 | 28.2 | 139.1 |
| 1984 | 27.3 | 135.3 |
| 1983 | 26.5 | 131.6 |
| 1982 | 25.6 | 128.1 |
| 1981 | 24.8 | 124.6 |
| 1980 | 24 | 121.3 |
| 1979 | 23.2 | 118 |
| 1978 | 22.5 | 114.9 |
| 1977 | 21.7 | 111.8 |
| 1976 | 21 | 108.9 |
| 1975 | 20.3 | 106.2 |
| 1974 | 19.6 | 103.5 |
| 1973 | 18.9 | 100.9 |
| 1972 | 18.3 | 98.3 |
| 1971 | 17.7 | 95.8 |
| 1970 | 17.1 | 93.3 |
| 1969 | 16.5 | 90.8 |
| 1968 | 16 | 88.2 |
| 1967 | 15.5 | 85.7 |
| 1966 | 15 | 83.1 |
| 1965 | 14.5 | 80.5 |
| 1964 | 14 | 77.8 |
| 1963 | 13.6 | 75.2 |
| 1962 | 13.2 | 72.5 |
| 1961 | 12.8 | 69.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 45% | 83.2% |
| 2023 | 44.4% | 82.6% |
| 2022 | 43.7% | 82% |
| 2021 | 43% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 42.3% | 80.8% |
| 2019 | 41.6% | 80.1% |
| 2018 | 40.9% | 79.3% |
| 2017 | 40.2% | 78.6% |
| 2016 | 39.4% | 77.7% |
| 2015 | 38.7% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 37.9% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 37.1% | 75% |
| 2012 | 36.4% | 73.9% |
| 2011 | 35.6% | 72.9% |
| 2010 | 34.8% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | 34% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | 33.2% | 69.4% |
| 2007 | 32.5% | 68.2% |
| 2006 | 31.7% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 31% | 65.7% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 64.4% |
| 2003 | 28.7% | 63.1% |
| 2002 | 27.6% | 61.8% |
| 2001 | 26.5% | 60.4% |
| 2000 | 25.4% | 59.1% |
| 1999 | 24.4% | 58.2% |
| 1998 | 23.4% | 57.3% |
| 1997 | 22.4% | 56.4% |
| 1996 | 21.5% | 55.5% |
| 1995 | 20.5% | 54.6% |
| 1994 | 19.6% | 53.7% |
| 1993 | 18.8% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 18% | 51.8% |
| 1991 | 17.2% | 50.9% |
| 1990 | 16.4% | 50% |
| 1989 | 15.6% | 49.1% |
| 1988 | 14.9% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 14.2% | 47.3% |
| 1986 | 13.6% | 46.4% |
| 1985 | 12.9% | 45.4% |
| 1984 | 12.3% | 44.5% |
| 1983 | 11.7% | 44.2% |
| 1982 | 11.2% | 43.8% |
| 1981 | 10.6% | 43.5% |
| 1980 | 10.1% | 43.1% |
| 1979 | 9.64% | 42.7% |
| 1978 | 9.17% | 42.4% |
| 1977 | 8.72% | 42% |
| 1976 | 8.29% | 41.7% |
| 1975 | 7.88% | 41.3% |
| 1974 | 7.48% | 41% |
| 1973 | 7.11% | 40.7% |
| 1972 | 6.75% | 40.1% |
| 1971 | 6.41% | 39.4% |
| 1970 | 6.09% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 5.78% | 38.2% |
| 1968 | 5.49% | 37.6% |
| 1967 | 5.21% | 37% |
| 1966 | 4.94% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 4.69% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 4.45% | 35.2% |
| 1963 | 4.22% | 34.6% |
| 1962 | 4% | 34.4% |
| 1961 | 3.79% | 34.3% |
| 1960 | 3.6% | 34.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 45% in Bhutan and from 64.4% to 83.2% in Costa Rica.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Jose | 342K |
| Limon | 71.5K |
| Liberia | 65.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons