Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 83.2 people in Estonia. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 355,676 sq ft in Estonia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Estonia are ranked 164th and 152nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Estonia, hence the population density in Brazil is 21% lower than in Estonia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 83.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 152/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
1355535
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 16,498 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 335,238 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 30% |
| Urban population | 88% | 70% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 0% |
Brazil vs Estonia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 0.11% decline in Estonia.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. Estonia was 141st in 2004 and ranks 152nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 83.2 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 83.1 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 81.8 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 80.6 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 80.5 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 80.4 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 80.1 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 79.8 |
| 2016 | 63 | 78.4 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 78.4 |
| 2014 | 62 | 78.3 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 78.5 |
| 2012 | 61 | 80.8 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 81.1 |
| 2010 | 60 | 81.4 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 81.5 |
| 2008 | 59 | 81.7 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 81.9 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 82.3 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 82.8 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 83.3 |
| 2003 | 56 | 83.7 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 84.3 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 84.8 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 85.4 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 84.9 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 84.7 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 85.5 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 86.5 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 87.8 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 89.4 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 91.3 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 93.7 |
| 1991 | 47 | - |
| 1990 | 46.2 | - |
| 1989 | 45.4 | - |
| 1988 | 44.6 | - |
| 1987 | 43.7 | - |
| 1986 | 42.9 | - |
| 1985 | 42 | - |
| 1984 | 41.1 | - |
| 1983 | 40.2 | - |
| 1982 | 39.3 | - |
| 1981 | 38.4 | - |
| 1980 | 37.6 | - |
| 1979 | 36.7 | - |
| 1978 | 35.8 | - |
| 1977 | 35 | - |
| 1976 | 34.2 | - |
| 1975 | 33.3 | - |
| 1974 | 32.6 | - |
| 1973 | 31.8 | - |
| 1972 | 31 | - |
| 1971 | 30.3 | - |
| 1970 | 29.6 | - |
| 1969 | 28.8 | - |
| 1968 | 28.1 | - |
| 1967 | 27.4 | - |
| 1966 | 26.7 | - |
| 1965 | 26 | - |
| 1964 | 25.3 | - |
| 1963 | 24.5 | - |
| 1962 | 23.8 | - |
| 1961 | 23.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 70% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 69.8% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 69.6% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 69.4% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 69.2% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 69.1% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 68.9% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 68.7% |
| 2016 | 86% | 68.6% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 68.4% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 68.3% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 68.1% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 68% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 68% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 68.1% |
| 2009 | 84% | 68.2% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 68.4% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 68.5% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 68.6% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 68.7% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 68.9% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 69% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 69.1% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 69.2% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 69.4% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 69.5% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 69.7% |
| 1997 | 79% | 69.9% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 70.1% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 70.3% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 70.5% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 70.7% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 70.9% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 71% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 71.2% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 71.4% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 71.4% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 71.2% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 71% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 70.8% |
| 1984 | 69% | 70.6% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 70.3% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 70.1% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 69.9% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 69.7% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 69.5% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 69.1% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 68.6% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 68.1% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 67.6% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 67.1% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 66.5% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 66% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 65.5% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 64.9% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 64.3% |
| 1968 | 54% | 63.6% |
| 1967 | 53% | 62.8% |
| 1966 | 52% | 62.1% |
| 1965 | 51% | 61.3% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 60.6% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 59.8% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 59.1% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 58.3% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 57.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons