Brazil has a population density of 65.7 people per square mile compared to 274 people in Cuba. Brazil has 432,375 sq ft of land per person vs 107,724 sq ft in Cuba. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Brazil and Cuba are ranked 164th and 88th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Brazil has 2.6% of the world's population and 5.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Cuba, hence the population density in Brazil is 76% lower than in Cuba.
Population density comparison
Brazil
|
Cuba
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 65.7 ppl/mi² | 274 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 164/197 | 88/197 |
| Population |
213415080
|
10937204
|
| Land area | 3,227,096 sq mi | 40,077 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 424,372 sq ft | 101,759 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12% | 22.3% |
| Urban population | 88% | 77.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 19.2% | 22.7% |
Brazil vs Cuba:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Brazil increased by 16.1%, compared to a 0.15% growth in Cuba.
In 2004, Brazil ranked 152nd for population density and is in 164th place now. Cuba was 74th in 2004 and ranks 88th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Cuba
|
|
| 2024 | 65.7 | 274 |
| 2023 | 65.4 | 275 |
| 2022 | 65.2 | 276 |
| 2021 | 64.9 | 277.5 |
| 2020 | 64.7 | 278.9 |
| 2019 | 64.3 | 279.5 |
| 2018 | 63.9 | 280.1 |
| 2017 | 63.4 | 280.7 |
| 2016 | 63 | 280.4 |
| 2015 | 62.5 | 280.5 |
| 2014 | 62 | 281 |
| 2013 | 61.5 | 280.8 |
| 2012 | 61 | 274.5 |
| 2011 | 60.5 | 273.9 |
| 2010 | 60 | 274.9 |
| 2009 | 59.5 | 274.8 |
| 2008 | 59 | 274.8 |
| 2007 | 58.4 | 274.7 |
| 2006 | 57.8 | 274.5 |
| 2005 | 57.2 | 274 |
| 2004 | 56.6 | 273.5 |
| 2003 | 56 | 272.9 |
| 2002 | 55.3 | 272.1 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 268.7 |
| 2000 | 53.9 | 267.9 |
| 1999 | 53.2 | 267 |
| 1998 | 52.4 | 266.1 |
| 1997 | 51.6 | 265.2 |
| 1996 | 50.9 | 264.4 |
| 1995 | 50.1 | 263.5 |
| 1994 | 49.4 | 262.5 |
| 1993 | 48.6 | 261.4 |
| 1992 | 47.8 | 260.1 |
| 1991 | 47 | 258.5 |
| 1990 | 46.2 | 256.4 |
| 1989 | 45.4 | 254 |
| 1988 | 44.6 | 251.6 |
| 1987 | 43.7 | 249.2 |
| 1986 | 42.9 | 247 |
| 1985 | 42 | 244.9 |
| 1984 | 41.1 | 242.9 |
| 1983 | 40.2 | 240.9 |
| 1982 | 39.3 | 239 |
| 1981 | 38.4 | 237.5 |
| 1980 | 37.6 | 236.4 |
| 1979 | 36.7 | 235.4 |
| 1978 | 35.8 | 234.2 |
| 1977 | 35 | 232.7 |
| 1976 | 34.2 | 230.8 |
| 1975 | 33.3 | 228.6 |
| 1974 | 32.6 | 226.1 |
| 1973 | 31.8 | 223.2 |
| 1972 | 31 | 220 |
| 1971 | 30.3 | 216.5 |
| 1970 | 29.6 | 212.8 |
| 1969 | 28.8 | 209 |
| 1968 | 28.1 | 205.2 |
| 1967 | 27.4 | 201.4 |
| 1966 | 26.7 | 197.6 |
| 1965 | 26 | 193.7 |
| 1964 | 25.3 | 189.7 |
| 1963 | 24.5 | 185.7 |
| 1962 | 23.8 | 181.9 |
| 1961 | 23.1 | 178.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Brazil
|
Cuba
|
|
| 2024 | 88% | 77.7% |
| 2023 | 87.8% | 77.5% |
| 2022 | 87.6% | 77.4% |
| 2021 | 87.3% | 77.3% |
| 2020 | 87.1% | 77.2% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | 77.1% |
| 2018 | 86.6% | 77% |
| 2017 | 86.3% | 77% |
| 2016 | 86% | 76.9% |
| 2015 | 85.8% | 76.9% |
| 2014 | 85.5% | 76.9% |
| 2013 | 85.2% | 76.8% |
| 2012 | 84.9% | 76.8% |
| 2011 | 84.6% | 76.7% |
| 2010 | 84.3% | 76.6% |
| 2009 | 84% | 76.5% |
| 2008 | 83.7% | 76.4% |
| 2007 | 83.4% | 76.3% |
| 2006 | 83.1% | 76.2% |
| 2005 | 82.8% | 76.1% |
| 2004 | 82.5% | 76% |
| 2003 | 82.2% | 75.9% |
| 2002 | 81.9% | 75.8% |
| 2001 | 81.6% | 75.6% |
| 2000 | 81.2% | 75.3% |
| 1999 | 80.5% | 75.1% |
| 1998 | 79.8% | 74.9% |
| 1997 | 79% | 74.6% |
| 1996 | 78.3% | 74.4% |
| 1995 | 77.6% | 74.3% |
| 1994 | 76.9% | 74.1% |
| 1993 | 76.2% | 74% |
| 1992 | 75.4% | 73.8% |
| 1991 | 74.7% | 73.7% |
| 1990 | 73.9% | 73.4% |
| 1989 | 73.1% | 72.9% |
| 1988 | 72.3% | 72.4% |
| 1987 | 71.5% | 71.9% |
| 1986 | 70.7% | 71.4% |
| 1985 | 69.9% | 70.9% |
| 1984 | 69% | 70.4% |
| 1983 | 68.1% | 69.9% |
| 1982 | 67.3% | 69.4% |
| 1981 | 66.4% | 68.9% |
| 1980 | 65.5% | 68.1% |
| 1979 | 64.6% | 67.3% |
| 1978 | 63.6% | 66.6% |
| 1977 | 62.7% | 65.8% |
| 1976 | 61.7% | 65% |
| 1975 | 60.8% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 59.8% | 63.4% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 62.6% |
| 1972 | 57.9% | 61.8% |
| 1971 | 56.9% | 61% |
| 1970 | 55.9% | 60.3% |
| 1969 | 54.9% | 60.1% |
| 1968 | 54% | 59.9% |
| 1967 | 53% | 59.7% |
| 1966 | 52% | 59.5% |
| 1965 | 51% | 59.3% |
| 1964 | 50.1% | 59.2% |
| 1963 | 49.1% | 59% |
| 1962 | 48.1% | 58.8% |
| 1961 | 47.1% | 58.6% |
| 1960 | 46.1% | 58.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.5% to 88% in Brazil and from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba.
Densely populated cities
|
Brazil
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sao Paulo | 11.5M |
| Rio de Janeiro | 6.21M |
| Brasilia | 2.82M |
| Fortaleza | 2.43M |
| Salvador | 2.42M |
| Belo Horizonte | 2.32M |
| Manaus | 2.06M |
| Curitiba | 1.77M |
| Recife | 1.49M |
| Goiania | 1.44M |
|
Cuba
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
