Demographics of Cuba compared to the Czech Republic:
- As of 2025, the population of Cuba is 10.9M vs 10.8M in the Czech Republic.
- The median age in Cuba is 43.1 years compared to 44.1 years in the Czech Republic.
- Cuba is ranked 27/196 by median age (oldest to youngest) vs 21/196 for the Czech Republic.
- The average life expectancy at birth in Cuba is 78.4 years, compared to 80.1 years in the Czech Republic.
- The share of old-age demographic (65+) in Cuba is 16.6% vs 20.8% in the Czech Republic.
- The share of young demographic (0-15 years old) in Cuba is 15.3% vs 15.4% in the Czech Republic.
- Cuba has 7.45M working age adults (aged 15-64) vs 6.86M in the Czech Republic.
- The average number of children born to each woman is 1.44 in Cuba compared to 1.45 in the Czech Republic.
Demographic data comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population |
10937204
|
10753822
|
| Median age | 43.1 years | 44.1 years |
| Median age rank | 27/196 | 21/196 |
| Average age | 42 years | 43 years |
| Average age rank | 35/196 | 27/196 |
| Age dependency ratio | 46.8% | 56.8% |
| Young-age dependency ratio | 22.4% | 24.1% |
| Old-age dependency ratio | 24.3% | 32.7% |
| Male:Female ratio | 49.3:50.7 | 49.3:50.7 |
| Population density | 105.8 ppl/mi² | 141 ppl/mi² |
| Fertility rate | 1.44 | 1.45 |
| Life expectancy | 78.4 years | 80.1 years |
Median age history and projection chart in
Cuba vs the Czech Republic
| Year | Median age | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 22.5 | 33.1 |
| 1961 | 22.5 | 33.3 |
| 1962 | 22.4 | 33.5 |
| 1963 | 22.3 | 33.6 |
| 1964 | 22.2 | 33.6 |
| 1965 | 22.1 | 33.7 |
| 1966 | 22 | 33.7 |
| 1967 | 21.9 | 33.8 |
| 1968 | 21.9 | 33.8 |
| 1969 | 21.8 | 33.7 |
| 1970 | 21.8 | 33.6 |
| 1971 | 21.9 | 33.4 |
| 1972 | 21.9 | 33.3 |
| 1973 | 22.1 | 33.1 |
| 1974 | 22.2 | 32.9 |
| 1975 | 22.5 | 32.8 |
| 1976 | 22.7 | 32.7 |
| 1977 | 23 | 32.8 |
| 1978 | 23.4 | 32.8 |
| 1979 | 23.7 | 32.9 |
| 1980 | 24.1 | 33 |
| 1981 | 24.5 | 33.1 |
| 1982 | 24.8 | 33.4 |
| 1983 | 25.1 | 33.6 |
| 1984 | 25.5 | 33.9 |
| 1985 | 25.9 | 34.1 |
| 1986 | 26.3 | 34.3 |
| 1987 | 26.7 | 34.6 |
| 1988 | 27.1 | 34.8 |
| 1989 | 27.5 | 35 |
| 1990 | 27.9 | 35.2 |
| 1991 | 28.3 | 35.4 |
| 1992 | 28.7 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 29.2 | 35.8 |
| 1994 | 29.7 | 36 |
| 1995 | 30.3 | 36.1 |
| 1996 | 30.9 | 36.4 |
| 1997 | 31.4 | 36.7 |
| 1998 | 32 | 37 |
| 1999 | 32.5 | 37.3 |
| 2000 | 33.1 | 37.6 |
| 2001 | 33.6 | 37.8 |
| 2002 | 34.2 | 38 |
| 2003 | 34.7 | 38.2 |
| 2004 | 35.2 | 38.5 |
| 2005 | 35.7 | 38.7 |
| 2006 | 36.2 | 39 |
| 2007 | 36.8 | 39.2 |
| 2008 | 37.3 | 39.4 |
| 2009 | 37.7 | 39.5 |
| 2010 | 38.2 | 39.7 |
| 2011 | 38.6 | 39.9 |
| 2012 | 39.1 | 40.3 |
| 2013 | 39.7 | 40.7 |
| 2014 | 40.2 | 41.1 |
| 2015 | 40.6 | 41.5 |
| 2016 | 40.9 | 41.9 |
| 2017 | 41.3 | 42.2 |
| 2018 | 41.6 | 42.5 |
| 2019 | 41.9 | 42.9 |
| 2020 | 42.1 | 43.2 |
| 2021 | 42.3 | 43.5 |
| 2022 | 42.5 | 43.5 |
| 2023 | 42.8 | 43.6 |
| 2024 | 43.1 | 44.1 |
| 2025 | 43.2 | 44.8 |
| 2026 | 43.5 | 45.3 |
| 2027 | 43.8 | 45.6 |
| 2028 | 44.1 | 45.8 |
| 2029 | 44.5 | 46.1 |
| 2030 | 44.8 | 46.4 |
| 2031 | 45.2 | 46.6 |
| 2032 | 45.6 | 46.9 |
| 2033 | 45.9 | 47.1 |
| 2034 | 46.3 | 47.3 |
| 2035 | 46.7 | 47.5 |
| 2036 | 47.1 | 47.7 |
| 2037 | 47.5 | 47.9 |
| 2038 | 47.9 | 48 |
| 2039 | 48.3 | 48.2 |
| 2040 | 48.6 | 48.3 |
| 2041 | 48.9 | 48.4 |
| 2042 | 49.2 | 48.5 |
| 2043 | 49.4 | 48.4 |
| 2044 | 49.6 | 48.3 |
| 2045 | 49.8 | 48.1 |
| 2046 | 50 | 47.8 |
| 2047 | 50.3 | 47.6 |
| 2048 | 50.5 | 47.4 |
| 2049 | 50.7 | 47.2 |
| 2050 | 50.9 | 47 |
In 1960, the median age in Cuba was 22.5 years compared to 33.1 years in the Czech Republic. As of 2024, the median age had increased to 43.1 years in Cuba and to 44.1 years in the Czech Republic.
According to United Nations projections, the median age in Cuba is expected to increased to around 50.9 years by 2050 compared to 47 years in the Czech Republic. The aging demographics forecast is based on previous years' birth rates and increasing life expectancy.
Demographic pyramid: age and gender distribution
| Age range | Share of population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 0-4 | 2.3% | 2.14% | 2.47% | 2.36% |
| 5-9 | 2.69% | 2.5% | 2.72% | 2.59% |
| 10-14 | 2.91% | 2.75% | 2.69% | 2.56% |
| 15-19 | 2.71% | 2.58% | 2.75% | 2.63% |
| 20-24 | 3.07% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 2.43% |
| 25-29 | 3.12% | 2.96% | 2.62% | 2.49% |
| 30-34 | 3.47% | 3.27% | 3.34% | 3.13% |
| 35-39 | 3.6% | 3.41% | 3.49% | 3.26% |
| 40-44 | 2.93% | 2.84% | 3.69% | 3.44% |
| 45-49 | 3.18% | 3.2% | 4.39% | 4.15% |
| 50-54 | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.81% | 3.64% |
| 55-59 | 4.23% | 4.56% | 3.16% | 3.09% |
| 60-64 | 3.55% | 3.89% | 2.82% | 2.88% |
| 65-69 | 2.3% | 2.65% | 2.72% | 3.04% |
| 70-74 | 1.92% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 3.15% |
| 75-79 | 1.45% | 1.84% | 1.94% | 2.75% |
| 80+ | 1.69% | 2.41% | 1.64% | 3.09% |
The chart above is a variation of a population pyramid and represents a comparison of age and gender structure. Cuba has low demographic potential with 39.4% of people in the 0-34 age group compared to 37.3% and similar potential in the Czech Republic.
Age dependency chart
| Year | Age dependency ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total | Young | Old | Total | Young | Old | |
| 1960 | 67.5% | 60.4% | 7.18% | 53.9% | 39.4% | 14.4% |
| 1961 | 68% | 60.8% | 7.21% | 53.3% | 38.5% | 14.8% |
| 1962 | 68.8% | 61.5% | 7.27% | 52.3% | 37.3% | 15% |
| 1963 | 69.8% | 62.4% | 7.37% | 51.6% | 36.2% | 15.3% |
| 1964 | 70.8% | 63.3% | 7.5% | 51.3% | 35.6% | 15.7% |
| 1965 | 71.7% | 64% | 7.67% | 51.2% | 35% | 16.2% |
| 1966 | 72.6% | 64.8% | 7.88% | 50.9% | 34.3% | 16.6% |
| 1967 | 73.6% | 65.4% | 8.13% | 50.7% | 33.6% | 17.1% |
| 1968 | 74.4% | 66% | 8.41% | 50.4% | 32.9% | 17.5% |
| 1969 | 75.1% | 66.4% | 8.69% | 50.3% | 32.4% | 17.9% |
| 1970 | 75.7% | 66.7% | 8.96% | 50.2% | 32% | 18.2% |
| 1971 | 76.1% | 66.8% | 9.27% | 50.3% | 31.8% | 18.5% |
| 1972 | 76.3% | 66.6% | 9.64% | 50.7% | 31.8% | 18.9% |
| 1973 | 76.3% | 66.3% | 9.99% | 51.5% | 32.2% | 19.3% |
| 1974 | 76% | 65.6% | 10.3% | 52.8% | 33.1% | 19.8% |
| 1975 | 75.3% | 64.6% | 10.7% | 54.4% | 34.1% | 20.2% |
| 1976 | 74.1% | 63% | 11% | 55.8% | 35.1% | 20.7% |
| 1977 | 72.3% | 60.9% | 11.4% | 57% | 36% | 21% |
| 1978 | 70% | 58.4% | 11.6% | 58% | 36.7% | 21.3% |
| 1979 | 67.4% | 55.5% | 11.9% | 58.5% | 37% | 21.5% |
| 1980 | 64.5% | 52.4% | 12.1% | 58.4% | 37.1% | 21.3% |
| 1981 | 61.4% | 49.3% | 12.1% | 57.7% | 37% | 20.7% |
| 1982 | 58.5% | 46.4% | 12.1% | 56.7% | 36.8% | 19.9% |
| 1983 | 56% | 43.9% | 12.1% | 55.6% | 36.6% | 19% |
| 1984 | 53.8% | 41.7% | 12.1% | 54.7% | 36.3% | 18.4% |
| 1985 | 51.8% | 39.6% | 12.1% | 54.4% | 36.1% | 18.3% |
| 1986 | 49.9% | 37.7% | 12.1% | 54.3% | 35.8% | 18.4% |
| 1987 | 48.2% | 36% | 12.1% | 54% | 35.4% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 46.8% | 34.7% | 12.1% | 53.5% | 34.6% | 18.9% |
| 1989 | 45.9% | 33.7% | 12.1% | 52.6% | 33.6% | 19% |
| 1990 | 45.2% | 33.1% | 12.1% | 51.5% | 32.4% | 19% |
| 1991 | 44.9% | 32.7% | 12.2% | 50.4% | 31.4% | 19.1% |
| 1992 | 44.6% | 32.3% | 12.3% | 49.5% | 30.4% | 19.1% |
| 1993 | 44.5% | 32.1% | 12.4% | 48.5% | 29.4% | 19.1% |
| 1994 | 44.6% | 32% | 12.5% | 47.6% | 28.4% | 19.2% |
| 1995 | 44.8% | 32% | 12.8% | 46.7% | 27.4% | 19.3% |
| 1996 | 45.2% | 32.1% | 13.1% | 46% | 26.5% | 19.5% |
| 1997 | 45.4% | 32% | 13.4% | 45.4% | 25.8% | 19.6% |
| 1998 | 45.3% | 31.7% | 13.7% | 44.7% | 25% | 19.7% |
| 1999 | 45.2% | 31.3% | 13.9% | 44% | 24.3% | 19.7% |
| 2000 | 45.1% | 30.8% | 14.2% | 43.3% | 23.6% | 19.7% |
| 2001 | 45% | 30.4% | 14.6% | 42.6% | 22.9% | 19.7% |
| 2002 | 44.8% | 29.8% | 15% | 41.9% | 22.3% | 19.6% |
| 2003 | 44.6% | 29.3% | 15.3% | 41.2% | 21.7% | 19.6% |
| 2004 | 44.3% | 28.6% | 15.7% | 40.7% | 21.1% | 19.6% |
| 2005 | 43.9% | 27.8% | 16.1% | 40.4% | 20.6% | 19.7% |
| 2006 | 43.6% | 27.1% | 16.4% | 40.3% | 20.3% | 20% |
| 2007 | 43.4% | 26.5% | 16.8% | 40.4% | 20% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 43.3% | 26.1% | 17.3% | 40.8% | 20% | 20.8% |
| 2009 | 43.4% | 25.7% | 17.7% | 41.6% | 20.2% | 21.4% |
| 2010 | 43.6% | 25.4% | 18.1% | 42.6% | 20.5% | 22% |
| 2011 | 43.8% | 25.2% | 18.6% | 43.9% | 21% | 22.9% |
| 2012 | 44.1% | 24.9% | 19.1% | 45.5% | 21.5% | 24% |
| 2013 | 44.4% | 24.7% | 19.6% | 47.1% | 22% | 25.1% |
| 2014 | 44.6% | 24.4% | 20.1% | 48.6% | 22.4% | 26.2% |
| 2015 | 44.7% | 24.2% | 20.6% | 50.1% | 22.9% | 27.2% |
| 2016 | 44.9% | 23.9% | 21% | 51.6% | 23.4% | 28.2% |
| 2017 | 45% | 23.6% | 21.4% | 53.1% | 23.9% | 29.2% |
| 2018 | 45.3% | 23.4% | 21.9% | 54.6% | 24.4% | 30.2% |
| 2019 | 45.6% | 23.2% | 22.4% | 55.9% | 24.8% | 31.1% |
| 2020 | 45.9% | 23.1% | 22.8% | 57% | 25.1% | 31.9% |
| 2021 | 46% | 23% | 23% | 57.7% | 25.3% | 32.4% |
| 2022 | 46.1% | 22.9% | 23.2% | 57.4% | 25.1% | 32.3% |
| 2023 | 46.4% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 56.8% | 24.6% | 32.2% |
| 2024 | 46.8% | 22.4% | 24.3% | 56.8% | 24.1% | 32.7% |
Age dependency is the ratio of people not in the labor force (children under 15 and adults 64+) to people aged 15 to 64.
Age dependency in Cuba increased from 44.3% to 46.8% between 2004 and 2024.
In the Czech Republic, the ratio of dependent people increased from 40.7% to 56.8% between 2004 and 2024 with an increased share of young people and an increased proportion of people aged 65+.
Working age demographic
| Year | Working age population share | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 59.7% | 65% |
| 1961 | 59.5% | 65.2% |
| 1962 | 59.2% | 65.7% |
| 1963 | 58.9% | 66% |
| 1964 | 58.6% | 66.1% |
| 1965 | 58.2% | 66.2% |
| 1966 | 57.9% | 66.3% |
| 1967 | 57.6% | 66.4% |
| 1968 | 57.3% | 66.5% |
| 1969 | 57.1% | 66.5% |
| 1970 | 56.9% | 66.6% |
| 1971 | 56.8% | 66.5% |
| 1972 | 56.7% | 66.4% |
| 1973 | 56.7% | 66% |
| 1974 | 56.8% | 65.4% |
| 1975 | 57.1% | 64.8% |
| 1976 | 57.5% | 64.2% |
| 1977 | 58% | 63.7% |
| 1978 | 58.8% | 63.3% |
| 1979 | 59.8% | 63.1% |
| 1980 | 60.8% | 63.1% |
| 1981 | 61.9% | 63.4% |
| 1982 | 63.1% | 63.8% |
| 1983 | 64.1% | 64.3% |
| 1984 | 65% | 64.6% |
| 1985 | 65.9% | 64.8% |
| 1986 | 66.7% | 64.8% |
| 1987 | 67.5% | 64.9% |
| 1988 | 68.1% | 65.1% |
| 1989 | 68.6% | 65.5% |
| 1990 | 68.8% | 66% |
| 1991 | 69% | 66.5% |
| 1992 | 69.1% | 66.9% |
| 1993 | 69.2% | 67.3% |
| 1994 | 69.2% | 67.8% |
| 1995 | 69% | 68.2% |
| 1996 | 68.9% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 68.8% | 68.8% |
| 1998 | 68.8% | 69.1% |
| 1999 | 68.8% | 69.4% |
| 2000 | 68.9% | 69.8% |
| 2001 | 69% | 70.1% |
| 2002 | 69% | 70.5% |
| 2003 | 69.2% | 70.8% |
| 2004 | 69.3% | 71.1% |
| 2005 | 69.5% | 71.2% |
| 2006 | 69.6% | 71.3% |
| 2007 | 69.7% | 71.2% |
| 2008 | 69.8% | 71% |
| 2009 | 69.7% | 70.6% |
| 2010 | 69.6% | 70.1% |
| 2011 | 69.5% | 69.5% |
| 2012 | 69.4% | 68.7% |
| 2013 | 69.3% | 68% |
| 2014 | 69.2% | 67.3% |
| 2015 | 69.1% | 66.6% |
| 2016 | 69% | 66% |
| 2017 | 69% | 65.3% |
| 2018 | 68.8% | 64.7% |
| 2019 | 68.7% | 64.1% |
| 2020 | 68.5% | 63.7% |
| 2021 | 68.5% | 63.4% |
| 2022 | 68.4% | 63.5% |
| 2023 | 68.3% | 63.8% |
| 2024 | 68.1% | 63.8% |
| 2025 | 67.9% | 63.7% |
| 2026 | 67.7% | 63.7% |
| 2027 | 67.3% | 63.7% |
| 2028 | 66.7% | 63.7% |
| 2029 | 66% | 63.6% |
| 2030 | 65.4% | 63.5% |
| 2031 | 64.7% | 63.5% |
| 2032 | 64.1% | 63.5% |
| 2033 | 63.4% | 63.6% |
| 2034 | 62.8% | 63.6% |
| 2035 | 62.2% | 63.6% |
| 2036 | 61.5% | 63.5% |
| 2037 | 60.7% | 63.2% |
| 2038 | 60% | 62.8% |
| 2039 | 59.5% | 62.1% |
| 2040 | 59.1% | 61.4% |
| 2041 | 58.7% | 60.7% |
| 2042 | 58.5% | 60% |
| 2043 | 58.4% | 59.4% |
| 2044 | 58.4% | 58.7% |
| 2045 | 58.5% | 58.2% |
| 2046 | 58.5% | 57.8% |
| 2047 | 58.5% | 57.4% |
| 2048 | 58.4% | 57% |
| 2049 | 58.2% | 56.7% |
| 2050 | 58% | 56.4% |
Between 2004 and 2024, the share of working-age demographics aged 15-64 changed from 69.3% to 68.1% in Cuba and from 71.1% to 63.8% in the Czech Republic.
Share of young demographic (0-14 years old)
| Year | Share of people 0-14 years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 36% | 25.6% |
| 1961 | 36.2% | 25.1% |
| 1962 | 36.5% | 24.5% |
| 1963 | 36.8% | 23.9% |
| 1964 | 37.1% | 23.5% |
| 1965 | 37.3% | 23.2% |
| 1966 | 37.5% | 22.7% |
| 1967 | 37.7% | 22.3% |
| 1968 | 37.8% | 21.9% |
| 1969 | 37.9% | 21.6% |
| 1970 | 38% | 21.3% |
| 1971 | 37.9% | 21.1% |
| 1972 | 37.8% | 21.1% |
| 1973 | 37.6% | 21.2% |
| 1974 | 37.3% | 21.6% |
| 1975 | 36.8% | 22.1% |
| 1976 | 36.2% | 22.6% |
| 1977 | 35.4% | 22.9% |
| 1978 | 34.3% | 23.2% |
| 1979 | 33.2% | 23.4% |
| 1980 | 31.9% | 23.4% |
| 1981 | 30.5% | 23.5% |
| 1982 | 29.3% | 23.5% |
| 1983 | 28.1% | 23.5% |
| 1984 | 27.1% | 23.5% |
| 1985 | 26.1% | 23.4% |
| 1986 | 25.2% | 23.2% |
| 1987 | 24.3% | 23% |
| 1988 | 23.6% | 22.6% |
| 1989 | 23.1% | 22% |
| 1990 | 22.8% | 21.4% |
| 1991 | 22.5% | 20.9% |
| 1992 | 22.4% | 20.3% |
| 1993 | 22.2% | 19.8% |
| 1994 | 22.1% | 19.2% |
| 1995 | 22.1% | 18.7% |
| 1996 | 22.1% | 18.2% |
| 1997 | 22% | 17.7% |
| 1998 | 21.8% | 17.3% |
| 1999 | 21.5% | 16.9% |
| 2000 | 21.3% | 16.5% |
| 2001 | 20.9% | 16.1% |
| 2002 | 20.6% | 15.7% |
| 2003 | 20.2% | 15.3% |
| 2004 | 19.8% | 15% |
| 2005 | 19.4% | 14.7% |
| 2006 | 18.9% | 14.4% |
| 2007 | 18.5% | 14.3% |
| 2008 | 18.2% | 14.2% |
| 2009 | 17.9% | 14.2% |
| 2010 | 17.7% | 14.4% |
| 2011 | 17.5% | 14.6% |
| 2012 | 17.3% | 14.8% |
| 2013 | 17.1% | 14.9% |
| 2014 | 16.9% | 15.1% |
| 2015 | 16.7% | 15.3% |
| 2016 | 16.5% | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 16.3% | 15.6% |
| 2018 | 16.1% | 15.8% |
| 2019 | 16% | 15.9% |
| 2020 | 15.8% | 16% |
| 2021 | 15.8% | 16.1% |
| 2022 | 15.7% | 15.9% |
| 2023 | 15.5% | 15.7% |
| 2024 | 15.3% | 15.4% |
| 2025 | 15% | 15.1% |
| 2026 | 14.7% | 14.8% |
| 2027 | 14.4% | 14.6% |
| 2028 | 14.1% | 14.4% |
| 2029 | 13.9% | 14.2% |
| 2030 | 13.6% | 14% |
| 2031 | 13.4% | 13.8% |
| 2032 | 13.2% | 13.5% |
| 2033 | 13% | 13.3% |
| 2034 | 12.8% | 13% |
| 2035 | 12.7% | 12.9% |
| 2036 | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| 2037 | 12.6% | 12.5% |
| 2038 | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| 2039 | 12.4% | 12.6% |
| 2040 | 12.4% | 12.7% |
| 2041 | 12.3% | 12.8% |
| 2042 | 12.3% | 12.9% |
| 2043 | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| 2044 | 12.2% | 13.2% |
| 2045 | 12.1% | 13.4% |
| 2046 | 12.1% | 13.5% |
| 2047 | 12% | 13.7% |
| 2048 | 12% | 13.8% |
| 2049 | 11.9% | 13.9% |
| 2050 | 11.8% | 14% |
The share of young people aged below 15 is 15.3% in Cuba and 15.4% in The Czech Republic. Birth rates in Cuba compared to The Czech Republic .
Share of old population (65+)
| Year | Share of population 65+ years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 4.29% | 9.38% |
| 1961 | 4.29% | 9.64% |
| 1962 | 4.31% | 9.88% |
| 1963 | 4.34% | 10.1% |
| 1964 | 4.39% | 10.4% |
| 1965 | 4.47% | 10.7% |
| 1966 | 4.56% | 11% |
| 1967 | 4.69% | 11.3% |
| 1968 | 4.82% | 11.6% |
| 1969 | 4.96% | 11.9% |
| 1970 | 5.1% | 12.1% |
| 1971 | 5.27% | 12.3% |
| 1972 | 5.47% | 12.6% |
| 1973 | 5.67% | 12.8% |
| 1974 | 5.88% | 12.9% |
| 1975 | 6.1% | 13.1% |
| 1976 | 6.34% | 13.3% |
| 1977 | 6.59% | 13.4% |
| 1978 | 6.84% | 13.5% |
| 1979 | 7.09% | 13.6% |
| 1980 | 7.34% | 13.4% |
| 1981 | 7.52% | 13.1% |
| 1982 | 7.65% | 12.7% |
| 1983 | 7.77% | 12.2% |
| 1984 | 7.89% | 11.9% |
| 1985 | 8% | 11.8% |
| 1986 | 8.09% | 11.9% |
| 1987 | 8.17% | 12.1% |
| 1988 | 8.24% | 12.3% |
| 1989 | 8.3% | 12.4% |
| 1990 | 8.36% | 12.6% |
| 1991 | 8.43% | 12.7% |
| 1992 | 8.49% | 12.8% |
| 1993 | 8.56% | 12.9% |
| 1994 | 8.68% | 13% |
| 1995 | 8.84% | 13.2% |
| 1996 | 9.02% | 13.3% |
| 1997 | 9.2% | 13.5% |
| 1998 | 9.4% | 13.6% |
| 1999 | 9.6% | 13.7% |
| 2000 | 9.82% | 13.8% |
| 2001 | 10.1% | 13.8% |
| 2002 | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| 2003 | 10.6% | 13.9% |
| 2004 | 10.9% | 13.9% |
| 2005 | 11.2% | 14.1% |
| 2006 | 11.4% | 14.3% |
| 2007 | 11.7% | 14.5% |
| 2008 | 12% | 14.8% |
| 2009 | 12.3% | 15.1% |
| 2010 | 12.6% | 15.5% |
| 2011 | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| 2012 | 13.3% | 16.5% |
| 2013 | 13.6% | 17.1% |
| 2014 | 13.9% | 17.6% |
| 2015 | 14.2% | 18.1% |
| 2016 | 14.5% | 18.6% |
| 2017 | 14.8% | 19.1% |
| 2018 | 15.1% | 19.5% |
| 2019 | 15.4% | 19.9% |
| 2020 | 15.6% | 20.3% |
| 2021 | 15.7% | 20.5% |
| 2022 | 15.9% | 20.5% |
| 2023 | 16.2% | 20.5% |
| 2024 | 16.6% | 20.8% |
| 2025 | 17% | 21.2% |
| 2026 | 17.6% | 21.4% |
| 2027 | 18.3% | 21.6% |
| 2028 | 19.2% | 21.9% |
| 2029 | 20.1% | 22.2% |
| 2030 | 21% | 22.5% |
| 2031 | 21.9% | 22.7% |
| 2032 | 22.7% | 23% |
| 2033 | 23.6% | 23.1% |
| 2034 | 24.3% | 23.3% |
| 2035 | 25.1% | 23.6% |
| 2036 | 25.9% | 23.9% |
| 2037 | 26.8% | 24.2% |
| 2038 | 27.5% | 24.7% |
| 2039 | 28.1% | 25.3% |
| 2040 | 28.5% | 25.9% |
| 2041 | 28.9% | 26.5% |
| 2042 | 29.2% | 27% |
| 2043 | 29.3% | 27.6% |
| 2044 | 29.4% | 28% |
| 2045 | 29.4% | 28.4% |
| 2046 | 29.4% | 28.7% |
| 2047 | 29.5% | 28.9% |
| 2048 | 29.7% | 29.2% |
| 2049 | 29.9% | 29.4% |
| 2050 | 30.2% | 29.6% |
The share of older people aged 65 and over is 16.6% in Cuba and 20.8% in the Czech Republic. Life expectancy in Cuba compared to the Czech Republic .
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Demographics by nationality or race
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| White | 65.1% |
| Mulatto | 24.9% |
| Black | 10.1% |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| Czech | 59.6% |
| Moravian | 5.17% |
| Slovak | 1.51% |
| Ukrainian | 0.86% |
| Vietnamese | 0.36% |
| Polish | 0.35% |
| Russian | 0.32% |
| Silesian | 0.29% |
| German | 0.23% |
| Romani (Gypsy) | 0.2% |
| All other | 30.8% |
Religion demographics in Cuba vs Czech Republic
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Religion | Share of population |
| Christianity | 60.7% |
| Atheism | 21.6% |
| Hinduism | 0.21% |
| Islam | 0.08% |
| Buddhism | 0.05% |
| Judaism | 0.01% |
| All other | 17.4% |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Religion | Share of population |
| Atheism | 72.8% |
| Christianity | 26.4% |
| Islam | 0.33% |
| Buddhism | 0.07% |
| Judaism | 0.03% |
| Hinduism | 0.02% |
| All other | 0.34% |
Median age map
Median age
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Demographics comparisons