Cuba has a population density of 274 people per square mile compared to 365 people in the Czech Republic. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 78,009 sq ft in the Czech Republic. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Cuba and the Czech Republic are ranked 88th and 69th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for the Czech Republic, hence the population density in Cuba is 25% lower than in the Czech Republic.
Population density comparison
Cuba
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 274 ppl/mi² | 365 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 88/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
10937204
|
10753822
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 29,794 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 76,329 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.3% | 25.3% |
| Urban population | 77.7% | 74.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.7% | 12.8% |
Cuba vs the Czech Republic:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Cuba increased by 0.15%, compared to a 6.85% growth in the Czech Republic.
In 2004, Cuba ranked 74th for population density and is in 88th place now. The Czech Republic was 59th in 2004 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Czech Republic
|
|
| 2024 | 274 | 365 |
| 2023 | 275 | 365 |
| 2022 | 276 | 358 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 353 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 359 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 358 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 357 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 355 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 354 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 354 |
| 2014 | 281 | 353 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 353 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 352 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 352 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 351 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 350 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 348 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 345 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 343 |
| 2005 | 274 | 342 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 342 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 342 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 342 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 342 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 344 |
| 1999 | 267 | 345 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 345 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 345 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 346 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 346 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 346 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 346 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | - |
| 1991 | 258.5 | - |
| 1990 | 256.4 | - |
| 1989 | 254 | - |
| 1988 | 251.6 | - |
| 1987 | 249.2 | - |
| 1986 | 247 | - |
| 1985 | 244.9 | - |
| 1984 | 242.9 | - |
| 1983 | 240.9 | - |
| 1982 | 239 | - |
| 1981 | 237.5 | - |
| 1980 | 236.4 | - |
| 1979 | 235.4 | - |
| 1978 | 234.2 | - |
| 1977 | 232.7 | - |
| 1976 | 230.8 | - |
| 1975 | 228.6 | - |
| 1974 | 226.1 | - |
| 1973 | 223.2 | - |
| 1972 | 220 | - |
| 1971 | 216.5 | - |
| 1970 | 212.8 | - |
| 1969 | 209 | - |
| 1968 | 205.2 | - |
| 1967 | 201.4 | - |
| 1966 | 197.6 | - |
| 1965 | 193.7 | - |
| 1964 | 189.7 | - |
| 1963 | 185.7 | - |
| 1962 | 181.9 | - |
| 1961 | 178.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Czech Republic
|
|
| 2024 | 77.7% | 74.7% |
| 2023 | 77.5% | 74.6% |
| 2022 | 77.4% | 74.4% |
| 2021 | 77.3% | 74.2% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 74.1% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 73.9% |
| 2018 | 77% | 73.8% |
| 2017 | 77% | 73.7% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 73.6% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 73.5% |
| 2014 | 76.9% | 73.4% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 73.3% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 73.2% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 73.3% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 73.3% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | 76.3% | 73.5% |
| 2006 | 76.2% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 76.1% | 73.6% |
| 2004 | 76% | 73.7% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 73.7% |
| 2002 | 75.8% | 73.8% |
| 2001 | 75.6% | 73.9% |
| 2000 | 75.3% | 74% |
| 1999 | 75.1% | 74.1% |
| 1998 | 74.9% | 74.3% |
| 1997 | 74.6% | 74.4% |
| 1996 | 74.4% | 74.5% |
| 1995 | 74.3% | 74.6% |
| 1994 | 74.1% | 74.8% |
| 1993 | 74% | 74.9% |
| 1992 | 73.8% | 75% |
| 1991 | 73.7% | 75.2% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 75.2% |
| 1989 | 72.9% | 75.2% |
| 1988 | 72.4% | 75.3% |
| 1987 | 71.9% | 75.3% |
| 1986 | 71.4% | 75.3% |
| 1985 | 70.9% | 75.4% |
| 1984 | 70.4% | 75.4% |
| 1983 | 69.9% | 75.4% |
| 1982 | 69.4% | 75.5% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 75.5% |
| 1980 | 68.1% | 75.2% |
| 1979 | 67.3% | 74.2% |
| 1978 | 66.6% | 73.1% |
| 1977 | 65.8% | 72.1% |
| 1976 | 65% | 71% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 69.9% |
| 1974 | 63.4% | 68.8% |
| 1973 | 62.6% | 67.6% |
| 1972 | 61.8% | 66.5% |
| 1971 | 61% | 65.3% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 64.4% |
| 1969 | 60.1% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 59.9% | 63.5% |
| 1967 | 59.7% | 63% |
| 1966 | 59.5% | 62.5% |
| 1965 | 59.3% | 62% |
| 1964 | 59.2% | 61.5% |
| 1963 | 59% | 61% |
| 1962 | 58.8% | 60.6% |
| 1961 | 58.6% | 60.1% |
| 1960 | 58.4% | 59.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba and from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic.
Densely populated cities
|
Cuba
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
