East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and Latvia are ranked 99th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in East Timor is 214.7% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
East Timor
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 99/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
1433311
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 67.2% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 32.8% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
East Timor vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 50.8%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 99th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 231 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 218 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 83 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 175 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | - |
| 1990 | 132.4 | - |
| 1989 | 129.7 | - |
| 1988 | 127.3 | - |
| 1987 | 125.1 | - |
| 1986 | 123.2 | - |
| 1985 | 121.3 | - |
| 1984 | 119.6 | - |
| 1983 | 118 | - |
| 1982 | 116.5 | - |
| 1981 | 115 | - |
| 1980 | 113.2 | - |
| 1979 | 111.2 | - |
| 1978 | 109.5 | - |
| 1977 | 107.7 | - |
| 1976 | 105.8 | - |
| 1975 | 104.2 | - |
| 1974 | 102.9 | - |
| 1973 | 101.5 | - |
| 1972 | 99.8 | - |
| 1971 | 98.1 | - |
| 1970 | 96.3 | - |
| 1969 | 94.6 | - |
| 1968 | 93 | - |
| 1967 | 91.4 | - |
| 1966 | 89.8 | - |
| 1965 | 88.3 | - |
| 1964 | 86.9 | - |
| 1963 | 85.4 | - |
| 1962 | 84.1 | - |
| 1961 | 82.8 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 32.8% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 32.1% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 31.7% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 31.3% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 30.6% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 30.2% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 29.8% | 68% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 68% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | 68% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 28.4% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 28.1% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 27.7% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 27.4% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 27% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 26.7% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 26.4% | 68% |
| 2005 | 26% | 68% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 25% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 24.6% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 24.3% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 23.9% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 23.6% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 22.5% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 22.2% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 21.9% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 21.5% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 20.8% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 20.4% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 19.9% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 19.5% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 19% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 18.1% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 17.7% | 68% |
| 1982 | 17.3% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 16.9% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 15.3% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 15% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 14.6% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 14.2% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 13.9% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 13.5% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 13.2% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 12.9% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 12.6% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 12.3% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 11.9% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 11.6% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 11.4% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 11.1% | 56% |
| 1963 | 10.8% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 10.5% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 10.2% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
