Honduras has a population density of 250.6 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. Honduras has 111,850 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Honduras and Latvia are ranked 97th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Honduras has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.08% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in Honduras is 223.3% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
Honduras
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 250.6 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 97/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
11149564
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 43,201 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 111,251 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 39.2% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 60.8% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 9.75% | 0% |
Honduras vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Honduras increased by 48.3%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, Honduras ranked 106th for population density and is in 97th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Honduras
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 250.6 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 246.4 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 242.2 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 238.2 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 234.2 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 230.2 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 226 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 221.9 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 217.9 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 213.8 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 209.8 | 83 |
| 2013 | 205.8 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 201.7 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 197.7 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 193.7 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 189.6 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 185.5 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 181.4 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 177.2 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 173.1 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 169 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 164.8 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 160.6 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 156.4 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 152.3 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 148.2 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 144.3 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 140.5 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 136.7 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 132.9 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 129.1 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 125.5 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 122 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 118.6 | - |
| 1990 | 115.3 | - |
| 1989 | 112.1 | - |
| 1988 | 109 | - |
| 1987 | 105.9 | - |
| 1986 | 103 | - |
| 1985 | 100.1 | - |
| 1984 | 97.2 | - |
| 1983 | 94.4 | - |
| 1982 | 91.6 | - |
| 1981 | 88.9 | - |
| 1980 | 86.3 | - |
| 1979 | 83.7 | - |
| 1978 | 81.1 | - |
| 1977 | 78.7 | - |
| 1976 | 76.3 | - |
| 1975 | 73.9 | - |
| 1974 | 71.8 | - |
| 1973 | 69.7 | - |
| 1972 | 67.6 | - |
| 1971 | 65.6 | - |
| 1970 | 63.7 | - |
| 1969 | 61.8 | - |
| 1968 | 60 | - |
| 1967 | 58.3 | - |
| 1966 | 56.6 | - |
| 1965 | 55 | - |
| 1964 | 53.5 | - |
| 1963 | 52 | - |
| 1962 | 50.5 | - |
| 1961 | 49.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Honduras
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 60.8% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 60.2% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 59.6% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 59% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 58.4% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 57.7% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 57.1% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 56.5% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 68% |
| 2015 | 55.2% | 68% |
| 2014 | 54.5% | 68% |
| 2013 | 53.9% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 53.2% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 52.5% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 51.9% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 51.2% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 50.6% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 49.9% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 49.2% | 68% |
| 2005 | 48.6% | 68% |
| 2004 | 47.9% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 47.3% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 46.6% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 46% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 45.5% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 45% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 44.4% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 43.9% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 43.4% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 42.9% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 42.4% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 41.9% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 41.4% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 41% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 40.5% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 40% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 39.5% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 38.9% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 38.3% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 37.7% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 37.2% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 36.6% | 68% |
| 1982 | 36% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 35.4% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 34.9% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 34.3% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 33.8% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 33.2% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 32.7% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 32.1% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 31.6% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 30.9% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 30.2% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 29.6% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 28.9% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 28.2% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 27.6% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 27% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 26.3% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 25.7% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 25.1% | 56% |
| 1963 | 24.5% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 23.9% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 23.3% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 22.7% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 47.9% to 60.8% in Honduras and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
Honduras
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tegucigalpa | 1.06M |
| San Pedro Sula | 719K |
| Choloma | 232K |
| La Ceiba | 197K |
| El Progreso | 188K |
| Villanueva | 150K |
| Comayagua | 145K |
| Puerto Cortes | 122K |
| Yoro | 86.7K |
| La Lima | 71.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
