Argentina has a population density of 43.2 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. Argentina has 654,934 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Argentina and Latvia are ranked 178th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Argentina has 0.56% of the world's population and 1.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in Argentina is 44.2% lower than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
Argentina
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 43.2 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 178/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
45973765
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 1,056,642 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 644,638 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 7.42% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 92.6% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.4% | 0% |
Argentina vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Argentina increased by 17.7%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, Argentina ranked 165th for population density and is in 178th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 43.2 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 43.1 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 43 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 42.9 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 42.8 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 42.3 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 41.9 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 41.5 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 41.1 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 40.7 | 83 |
| 2013 | 40.3 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 39.9 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 39.5 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 39.1 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 38.7 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 38.3 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 37.9 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 37.5 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 37.1 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 36.7 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 36.4 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 36 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 35.6 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 35.2 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 34.8 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 34.4 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 34 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 33.6 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 33.2 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 32.8 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 32.3 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 31.9 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 31.4 | - |
| 1990 | 31 | - |
| 1989 | 30.5 | - |
| 1988 | 30.1 | - |
| 1987 | 29.6 | - |
| 1986 | 29.2 | - |
| 1985 | 28.7 | - |
| 1984 | 28.3 | - |
| 1983 | 27.8 | - |
| 1982 | 27.4 | - |
| 1981 | 26.9 | - |
| 1980 | 26.5 | - |
| 1979 | 26.1 | - |
| 1978 | 25.7 | - |
| 1977 | 25.3 | - |
| 1976 | 24.9 | - |
| 1975 | 24.5 | - |
| 1974 | 24.1 | - |
| 1973 | 23.7 | - |
| 1972 | 23.3 | - |
| 1971 | 23 | - |
| 1970 | 22.6 | - |
| 1969 | 22.2 | - |
| 1968 | 21.9 | - |
| 1967 | 21.6 | - |
| 1966 | 21.3 | - |
| 1965 | 20.9 | - |
| 1964 | 20.6 | - |
| 1963 | 20.3 | - |
| 1962 | 19.9 | - |
| 1961 | 19.6 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 92.6% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 92.5% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 92.3% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 92.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 92.1% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 92% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 91.9% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 91.7% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 91.6% | 68% |
| 2015 | 91.5% | 68% |
| 2014 | 91.4% | 68% |
| 2013 | 91.2% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 91.1% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 91% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 90.8% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 90.7% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 90.5% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 90.4% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 90.2% | 68% |
| 2005 | 90% | 68% |
| 2004 | 89.9% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 89.7% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 89.5% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 89.3% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 89.1% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 89% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 88.8% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 88.6% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 88.2% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 88% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 87.8% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 87.5% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 87.3% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 87% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 86.6% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 86.2% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 85.8% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 85.4% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 85% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 84.6% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 84.2% | 68% |
| 1982 | 83.8% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 83.3% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 82.9% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 82.5% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 82.1% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 81.8% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 81.4% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 81% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 80.6% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 80.2% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 79.7% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 79.3% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 78.9% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 78.4% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 77.9% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 76.9% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 76.4% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 75.8% | 56% |
| 1963 | 75.3% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 74.8% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 74.2% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 73.6% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 89.9% to 92.6% in Argentina and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
Argentina
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Buenos Aires | 3.12M |
| Cordoba | 1.33M |
| Rosario | 1.19M |
| San Miguel de Tucuman | 606K |
| Mar del Plata | 593K |
| Salta | 535K |
| San Juan | 471K |
| Lanus | 459K |
| Santiago del Estero | 430K |
| Santa Fe | 406K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
