Latvia has a population density of 76.2 people per square mile compared to 47,292 people in Monaco. Latvia has 372,581 sq ft of land per person vs 580 sq ft in Monaco. Latvia and Monaco rank 158th and 1st by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.0005% of the population and 0.000001% of the land area for Monaco, making the population density in Latvia 99.8% lower than in Monaco.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Latvia
|
Monaco
|
|
| 2026 | 76.2 | 47,292 |
| 2025 | 77 | 47,649 |
| 2024 | 77.7 | 48,010 |
| 2023 | 78.4 | 48,414 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 48,383 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 47,881 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 48,618 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 48,694 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 48,751 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 48,143 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 47,629 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 46,966 |
| 2014 | 83 | 46,162 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 45,292 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 44,352 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 43,374 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 42,374 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 41,353 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 40,678 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 40,680 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 40,961 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 41,156 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 41,280 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 41,366 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 41,427 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 41,459 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 41,469 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 41,412 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 41,229 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 40,968 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 40,680 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 40,388 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 40,089 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 39,784 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 39,466 |
| 1991 | - | 39,131 |
| 1990 | - | 38,790 |
| 1989 | - | 38,440 |
| 1988 | - | 38,053 |
| 1987 | - | 37,624 |
| 1986 | - | 37,173 |
| 1985 | - | 36,711 |
| 1984 | - | 36,232 |
| 1983 | - | 35,726 |
| 1982 | - | 35,216 |
| 1981 | - | 34,873 |
| 1980 | - | 34,655 |
| 1979 | - | 34,361 |
| 1978 | - | 33,994 |
| 1977 | - | 33,570 |
| 1976 | - | 33,087 |
| 1975 | - | 32,582 |
| 1974 | - | 32,244 |
| 1973 | - | 32,036 |
| 1972 | - | 31,767 |
| 1971 | - | 31,402 |
| 1970 | - | 30,958 |
| 1969 | - | 30,450 |
| 1968 | - | 29,946 |
| 1967 | - | 29,682 |
| 1966 | - | 29,556 |
| 1965 | - | 29,313 |
| 1964 | - | 28,987 |
| 1963 | - | 28,602 |
| 1962 | - | 28,210 |
| 1961 | - | 27,984 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/latvia/monaco | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.5%, compared to a 15.5% growth in Monaco.
In 2006, Latvia ranked 141st by population density and is 158th now. Monaco was 1st in 2006 and still ranks 1st out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Latvia
|
Monaco
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 76.2 ppl/mi² | 47,292 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 158/197 | 1/197 |
| Population |
1829763
|
38053
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 0.8 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 358,946 sq ft | 581 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.5% | 0% |
| Urban population | 68.5% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Monaco
|
|
| 2024 | 68.5% | 100% |
| 2023 | 68.4% | 100% |
| 2022 | 68.3% | 100% |
| 2021 | 68.2% | 100% |
| 2020 | 68.1% | 100% |
| 2019 | 68.1% | 100% |
| 2018 | 68% | 100% |
| 2017 | 68% | 100% |
| 2016 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2015 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2014 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2013 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2012 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2011 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 100% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2006 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2005 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2003 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 2002 | 68% | 100% |
| 2001 | 68% | 100% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 100% |
| 1999 | 68.1% | 100% |
| 1998 | 68.3% | 100% |
| 1997 | 68.5% | 100% |
| 1996 | 68.8% | 100% |
| 1995 | 69.2% | 100% |
| 1994 | 69.6% | 100% |
| 1993 | 69.9% | 100% |
| 1992 | 70.2% | 100% |
| 1991 | 70.5% | 100% |
| 1990 | 70.7% | 100% |
| 1989 | 70.8% | 100% |
| 1988 | 70.8% | 100% |
| 1987 | 70.7% | 100% |
| 1986 | 70.5% | 100% |
| 1985 | 70.3% | 100% |
| 1984 | 70% | 100% |
| 1983 | 69.6% | 100% |
| 1982 | 69.2% | 100% |
| 1981 | 68.8% | 100% |
| 1980 | 68.4% | 100% |
| 1979 | 68% | 100% |
| 1978 | 67.6% | 100% |
| 1977 | 67.1% | 100% |
| 1976 | 66.5% | 100% |
| 1975 | 65.9% | 100% |
| 1974 | 65.3% | 100% |
| 1973 | 64.7% | 100% |
| 1972 | 64% | 100% |
| 1971 | 63.4% | 100% |
| 1970 | 62.7% | 100% |
| 1969 | 62.1% | 100% |
| 1968 | 61.6% | 100% |
| 1967 | 61% | 100% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 100% |
| 1965 | 60% | 100% |
| 1964 | 59.4% | 100% |
| 1963 | 58.9% | 100% |
| 1962 | 58.3% | 100% |
| 1961 | 57.7% | 100% |
| 1960 | 57.1% | 100% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/latvia/monaco | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.5% in Latvia and from 100% to 100% in Monaco.
Densely populated cities
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Riga | 595K |
| Daugavpils | 78.1K |
| Liepaja | 67.4K |
| Jelgava | 54.8K |
| Jurmala | 52K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/latvia/monaco | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.