Burkina Faso has a population density of 222.9 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. Burkina Faso has 125,334 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Burkina Faso and Latvia are ranked 102nd and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Burkina Faso has 0.29% of the world's population and 0.18% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in Burkina Faso is 187.6% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 222.9 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 102/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
24497999
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 105,638 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 125,060 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 66.8% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 33.2% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 10.4% | 0% |
Burkina Faso vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Burkina Faso increased by 74.4%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, Burkina Faso ranked 121st for population density and is in 102nd place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 222.9 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 218 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 213.1 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 208.2 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 203.3 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 198.4 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 193.5 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 188.3 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 183 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 177.8 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 172.6 | 83 |
| 2013 | 167.5 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 162.6 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 157.7 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 153.1 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 148.7 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 144.4 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 140.3 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 136.1 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 131.9 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 127.8 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 123.8 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 120 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 116.4 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 112.9 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 109.6 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 106.4 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 103.5 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 100.9 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 98.3 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 95.8 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 93.4 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 91.2 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 88.9 | - |
| 1990 | 86.7 | - |
| 1989 | 84.5 | - |
| 1988 | 82.2 | - |
| 1987 | 80.1 | - |
| 1986 | 77.9 | - |
| 1985 | 75.7 | - |
| 1984 | 73.6 | - |
| 1983 | 71.5 | - |
| 1982 | 69.5 | - |
| 1981 | 67.6 | - |
| 1980 | 65.8 | - |
| 1979 | 64 | - |
| 1978 | 62.4 | - |
| 1977 | 60.9 | - |
| 1976 | 59.5 | - |
| 1975 | 58.2 | - |
| 1974 | 57 | - |
| 1973 | 56 | - |
| 1972 | 55 | - |
| 1971 | 54 | - |
| 1970 | 53.1 | - |
| 1969 | 52.2 | - |
| 1968 | 51.3 | - |
| 1967 | 50.4 | - |
| 1966 | 49.6 | - |
| 1965 | 48.8 | - |
| 1964 | 48 | - |
| 1963 | 47.3 | - |
| 1962 | 46.6 | - |
| 1961 | 45.9 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 33.2% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 31.9% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 31.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 30.6% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 30% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 29.4% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 28.7% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 28.1% | 68% |
| 2015 | 27.5% | 68% |
| 2014 | 26.9% | 68% |
| 2013 | 26.3% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 25.8% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 25.2% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 24.6% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 24.1% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 23.5% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 23% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 22.3% | 68% |
| 2005 | 21.5% | 68% |
| 2004 | 20.8% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 20% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 19.3% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 18.5% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 17.8% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 17.2% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 16.5% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 15.9% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 15.4% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 15.1% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 14.9% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 14.6% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 14.3% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 14.1% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 13.8% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 13.6% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 13.3% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 13.1% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 12.8% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 12.3% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 11.5% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 10.8% | 68% |
| 1982 | 10.1% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 9.43% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 8.81% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 8.22% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 7.67% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 7.15% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 6.67% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 6.35% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 6.22% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 6.1% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 5.98% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 5.86% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 5.75% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 5.63% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 5.52% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 5.41% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 5.3% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 5.2% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 5.09% | 56% |
| 1963 | 4.99% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 4.89% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 4.8% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 4.7% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 20.8% to 33.2% in Burkina Faso and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Ouagadougou | 2.45M |
| Bobo-Dioulasso | 904K |
| Koudougou | 160K |
| Ouahigouya | 125K |
| Fada N'gourma | 73.2K |
| Dedougou | 63.6K |
| Leo | 51.7K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons