Denmark has a population density of 387 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. Denmark has 77,304 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Denmark and Latvia are ranked 66th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Denmark has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in Denmark is 399% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
Denmark
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 387 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 66/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
6018959
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 15,444 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 72,036 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11.4% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 88.6% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Denmark vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Denmark increased by 10.6%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, Denmark ranked 57th for population density and is in 66th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Denmark
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 387 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 385 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 382 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 379 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 378 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 376 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 375 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 373 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 371 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 368 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 365 | 83 |
| 2013 | 364 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 362 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 361 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 359 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 358 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 356 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 354 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 352 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 351 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 350 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 349 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 348 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 347 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 346 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 345 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 343 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 342 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 341 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 339 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 337 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 336 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 335 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 334 | - |
| 1990 | 333 | - |
| 1989 | 332 | - |
| 1988 | 332 | - |
| 1987 | 332 | - |
| 1986 | 332 | - |
| 1985 | 331 | - |
| 1984 | 331 | - |
| 1983 | 331 | - |
| 1982 | 331 | - |
| 1981 | 332 | - |
| 1980 | 332 | - |
| 1979 | 331 | - |
| 1978 | 330 | - |
| 1977 | 329 | - |
| 1976 | 328 | - |
| 1975 | 328 | - |
| 1974 | 327 | - |
| 1973 | 325 | - |
| 1972 | 323 | - |
| 1971 | 321 | - |
| 1970 | 319 | - |
| 1969 | 317 | - |
| 1968 | 315 | - |
| 1967 | 313 | - |
| 1966 | 311 | - |
| 1965 | 308 | - |
| 1964 | 306 | - |
| 1963 | 303 | - |
| 1962 | 301 | - |
| 1961 | 298.6 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Denmark
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 88.6% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 88.5% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 88.4% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 88.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 88.1% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 88% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 87.9% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 87.8% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 87.6% | 68% |
| 2015 | 87.5% | 68% |
| 2014 | 87.4% | 68% |
| 2013 | 87.3% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 87.1% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 87% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 86.8% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 86.7% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 86.5% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 86.3% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 86.1% | 68% |
| 2005 | 85.9% | 68% |
| 2004 | 85.6% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 85.4% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 85.2% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 85.2% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 85.1% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 85.1% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 85.1% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 85% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 85% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 85% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 85% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 84.9% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 84.9% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 84.8% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 84.8% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 84.7% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 84.6% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 84.5% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 84.4% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 84.2% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 84.1% | 68% |
| 1982 | 84% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 83.9% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 83.7% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 83.4% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 83.2% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 82.9% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 82.6% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 82.1% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 81.7% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 81.2% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 80.7% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 80.2% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 79.7% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 79.2% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 78.7% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 78.2% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 77.6% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 77% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 76.4% | 56% |
| 1963 | 75.8% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 75.1% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 74.4% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 73.7% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 85.6% to 88.6% in Denmark and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
