France has a population density of 329 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. France has 101,141 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, France and Latvia are ranked 75th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. France has 0.84% of the world's population and 0.36% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in France is 325% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 329 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 75/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
68701054
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 208,090 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 84,669 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 18% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 82% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 3.13% | 0% |
France vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in France increased by 9.26%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, France ranked 67th for population density and is in 75th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 329 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 328 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 327 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 326 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 325 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 324 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 323 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 322 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 321 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 320 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 319 | 83 |
| 2013 | 317 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 316 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 314 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 312 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 311 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 309 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 308 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 306 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 304 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 301 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 299.1 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 297 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 294.9 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 292.8 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 290.7 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 289.3 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 288.2 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 287.2 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 286.1 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 285.1 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 284 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 282.8 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 281.4 | - |
| 1990 | 280 | - |
| 1989 | 278.5 | - |
| 1988 | 276.8 | - |
| 1987 | 275.2 | - |
| 1986 | 273.7 | - |
| 1985 | 272.3 | - |
| 1984 | 271 | - |
| 1983 | 269.6 | - |
| 1982 | 268.2 | - |
| 1981 | 267.2 | - |
| 1980 | 265.6 | - |
| 1979 | 264.2 | - |
| 1978 | 263 | - |
| 1977 | 261.8 | - |
| 1976 | 260.6 | - |
| 1975 | 259.5 | - |
| 1974 | 258.3 | - |
| 1973 | 256.6 | - |
| 1972 | 254.5 | - |
| 1971 | 252.3 | - |
| 1970 | 249.9 | - |
| 1969 | 247.7 | - |
| 1968 | 245.6 | - |
| 1967 | 243.8 | - |
| 1966 | 241.8 | - |
| 1965 | 239.7 | - |
| 1964 | 237.4 | - |
| 1963 | 234.9 | - |
| 1962 | 232.5 | - |
| 1961 | 230.2 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 82% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 81.8% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 81.5% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 81.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 81% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 80.7% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 80.4% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 80.2% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 79.9% | 68% |
| 2015 | 79.7% | 68% |
| 2014 | 79.4% | 68% |
| 2013 | 79.1% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 78.9% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 78.6% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 78.4% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 78.1% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 77.9% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 77.6% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 77.4% | 68% |
| 2005 | 77.1% | 68% |
| 2004 | 76.9% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 76.6% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 76.4% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 76.1% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 75.9% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 75.6% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 75.4% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 75.3% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 75.1% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 74.9% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 74.7% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 74.6% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 74.4% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 74.2% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 74.1% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 73.9% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 73.9% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 73.8% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 73.7% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 73.6% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 73.6% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 73.5% | 68% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 73.4% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 73.3% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 73.2% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 73.1% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 73% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 72.9% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 72.7% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 72.3% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 71.9% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 71.5% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 71.1% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 70.6% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 70.2% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 69.4% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 68.2% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 67.1% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 65.9% | 56% |
| 1963 | 64.7% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 63.5% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 62.6% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 61.9% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76.9% to 82% in France and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Paris | 2.15M |
| Marseille | 877K |
| Lyon | 521K |
| Toulouse | 512K |
| Nice | 354K |
| Nantes | 325K |
| Strasbourg | 292K |
| Toulon | 181K |
| Saint-Etienne | 173K |
| Saint-Denis | 156K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons