The Gambia has a population density of 739 people per square mile compared to 76.2 people in Latvia. The Gambia has 44,070 sq ft of land per person vs 372,581 sq ft in Latvia. The Gambia and Latvia rank 36th and 158th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Gambia has 0.03% of the world's population and 0.007% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, making the population density in the Gambia 870% higher than in Latvia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Gambia
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2026 | 739 | 76.2 |
| 2025 | 722 | 77 |
| 2024 | 706 | 77.7 |
| 2023 | 690 | 78.4 |
| 2022 | 675 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 659 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 644 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 629 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 614 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 599 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 584 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 569 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 554 | 83 |
| 2013 | 538 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 523 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 508 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 493 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 479 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 465 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 452 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 439 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 427 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 415 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 404 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 393 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 383 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 372 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 362 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 352 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 343 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 333 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 324 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 314 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 304 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 293.2 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 281.5 | - |
| 1990 | 269.9 | - |
| 1989 | 258.8 | - |
| 1988 | 248.3 | - |
| 1987 | 238.3 | - |
| 1986 | 228.8 | - |
| 1985 | 219.8 | - |
| 1984 | 211.3 | - |
| 1983 | 203.3 | - |
| 1982 | 196 | - |
| 1981 | 189.2 | - |
| 1980 | 182.7 | - |
| 1979 | 176.5 | - |
| 1978 | 170.7 | - |
| 1977 | 165.3 | - |
| 1976 | 160.1 | - |
| 1975 | 155.3 | - |
| 1974 | 150.8 | - |
| 1973 | 146.4 | - |
| 1972 | 142.1 | - |
| 1971 | 138 | - |
| 1970 | 134.1 | - |
| 1969 | 130.4 | - |
| 1968 | 126.8 | - |
| 1967 | 123.3 | - |
| 1966 | 119.9 | - |
| 1965 | 116.7 | - |
| 1964 | 113.6 | - |
| 1963 | 110.5 | - |
| 1962 | 107.5 | - |
| 1961 | 104.7 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/gambia/latvia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in the Gambia increased by 68.2%, compared to a 17.5% decline in Latvia.
In 2006, the Gambia ranked 51st by population density and is 36th now. Latvia was 141st in 2006 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Gambia
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 739 ppl/mi² | 76.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 36/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
2902554
|
1829763
|
| Land area | 3,907 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 39,468 sq ft | 358,946 sq ft |
| Rural population | 35.7% | 31.5% |
| Urban population | 64.3% | 68.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Gambia
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 64.3% | 68.5% |
| 2023 | 63.8% | 68.4% |
| 2022 | 63.3% | 68.3% |
| 2021 | 62.8% | 68.2% |
| 2020 | 62.2% | 68.1% |
| 2019 | 61.6% | 68.1% |
| 2018 | 61.1% | 68% |
| 2017 | 60.5% | 68% |
| 2016 | 59.9% | 67.9% |
| 2015 | 59.2% | 67.9% |
| 2014 | 58.6% | 67.9% |
| 2013 | 58% | 67.8% |
| 2012 | 57.3% | 67.8% |
| 2011 | 56.7% | 67.8% |
| 2010 | 56% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 55.3% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 54.6% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 53.9% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 53.2% | 67.9% |
| 2005 | 52.4% | 67.9% |
| 2004 | 51.5% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 50.6% | 67.9% |
| 2002 | 49.6% | 68% |
| 2001 | 48.3% | 68% |
| 2000 | 47% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 45.5% | 68.1% |
| 1998 | 44% | 68.3% |
| 1997 | 42.4% | 68.5% |
| 1996 | 40.9% | 68.8% |
| 1995 | 39.6% | 69.2% |
| 1994 | 38.3% | 69.6% |
| 1993 | 37.3% | 69.9% |
| 1992 | 36.5% | 70.2% |
| 1991 | 35.8% | 70.5% |
| 1990 | 35.2% | 70.7% |
| 1989 | 34.6% | 70.8% |
| 1988 | 34.1% | 70.8% |
| 1987 | 33.6% | 70.7% |
| 1986 | 33.1% | 70.5% |
| 1985 | 32.5% | 70.3% |
| 1984 | 31.8% | 70% |
| 1983 | 31% | 69.6% |
| 1982 | 30% | 69.2% |
| 1981 | 28.7% | 68.8% |
| 1980 | 27.2% | 68.4% |
| 1979 | 25.6% | 68% |
| 1978 | 23.8% | 67.6% |
| 1977 | 22% | 67.1% |
| 1976 | 20.3% | 66.5% |
| 1975 | 18.7% | 65.9% |
| 1974 | 17.3% | 65.3% |
| 1973 | 16.1% | 64.7% |
| 1972 | 15.1% | 64% |
| 1971 | 14.1% | 63.4% |
| 1970 | 13.2% | 62.7% |
| 1969 | 12.2% | 62.1% |
| 1968 | 11.3% | 61.6% |
| 1967 | 10.5% | 61% |
| 1966 | 9.86% | 60.5% |
| 1965 | 9.33% | 60% |
| 1964 | 8.98% | 59.4% |
| 1963 | 8.82% | 58.9% |
| 1962 | 8.84% | 58.3% |
| 1961 | 8.93% | 57.7% |
| 1960 | 9.07% | 57.1% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/gambia/latvia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 51.5% to 64.3% in the Gambia and from 67.9% to 68.5% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Riga | 595K |
| Daugavpils | 78.1K |
| Liepaja | 67.4K |
| Jelgava | 54.8K |
| Jurmala | 52K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/gambia/latvia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.