Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 244 people in East Timor. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 114,650 sq ft in East Timor. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and East Timor are ranked 26th and 99th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for East Timor, hence the population density in Curacao is 272.8% higher than in East Timor.
Population density comparison
Curacao
|
East Timor
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 244 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 99/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
1433311
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 5,741 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 114,276 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 67.2% |
| Urban population | 89% | 32.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Curacao vs East Timor:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 26.2% growth in East Timor.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. East Timor was 106th in 2011 and ranks 99th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 244 |
| 2023 | 909 | 241.1 |
| 2022 | 875 | 238.5 |
| 2021 | 889 | 235.2 |
| 2020 | 904 | 231 |
| 2019 | 918 | 226.6 |
| 2018 | 929 | 222.2 |
| 2017 | 934 | 218 |
| 2016 | 931 | 213.9 |
| 2015 | 922 | 209.9 |
| 2014 | 909 | 205.9 |
| 2013 | 897 | 201.8 |
| 2012 | 887 | 197.7 |
| 2011 | 880 | 193.4 |
| 2010 | - | 188.9 |
| 2009 | - | 184.4 |
| 2008 | - | 179.8 |
| 2007 | - | 175 |
| 2006 | - | 170.1 |
| 2005 | - | 165.2 |
| 2004 | - | 161.8 |
| 2003 | - | 159.7 |
| 2002 | - | 153.1 |
| 2001 | - | 141.5 |
| 2000 | - | 129.8 |
| 1999 | - | 145.4 |
| 1998 | - | 164.2 |
| 1997 | - | 159.8 |
| 1996 | - | 155.4 |
| 1995 | - | 151.2 |
| 1994 | - | 147.1 |
| 1993 | - | 143.1 |
| 1992 | - | 139.2 |
| 1991 | - | 135.6 |
| 1990 | - | 132.4 |
| 1989 | - | 129.7 |
| 1988 | - | 127.3 |
| 1987 | - | 125.1 |
| 1986 | - | 123.2 |
| 1985 | - | 121.3 |
| 1984 | - | 119.6 |
| 1983 | - | 118 |
| 1982 | - | 116.5 |
| 1981 | - | 115 |
| 1980 | - | 113.2 |
| 1979 | - | 111.2 |
| 1978 | - | 109.5 |
| 1977 | - | 107.7 |
| 1976 | - | 105.8 |
| 1975 | - | 104.2 |
| 1974 | - | 102.9 |
| 1973 | - | 101.5 |
| 1972 | - | 99.8 |
| 1971 | - | 98.1 |
| 1970 | - | 96.3 |
| 1969 | - | 94.6 |
| 1968 | - | 93 |
| 1967 | - | 91.4 |
| 1966 | - | 89.8 |
| 1965 | - | 88.3 |
| 1964 | - | 86.9 |
| 1963 | - | 85.4 |
| 1962 | - | 84.1 |
| 1961 | - | 82.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 32.8% |
| 2023 | 89% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 89% | 32.1% |
| 2021 | 89% | 31.7% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 30.9% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 30.6% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 30.2% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 29.8% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 29.5% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 29.1% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 28.8% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 28.4% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 28.1% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | 90% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 27% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 26.7% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 26.4% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 26% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 25.7% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 25.3% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 25% |
| 2001 | 91% | 24.6% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 24.3% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 23.6% |
| 1997 | 89% | 23.2% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 22.5% |
| 1994 | 87% | 22.2% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 21.9% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 21.5% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 20.8% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 20.4% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 19.9% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 19.5% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 19% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 83% | 18.1% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 17.7% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 17.3% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 16.9% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 15.7% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 15.3% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 15% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 14.6% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 14.2% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 13.9% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 13.2% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 12.9% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 12.6% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 12.3% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 11.9% |
| 1966 | 77% | 11.6% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 11.4% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 10.8% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 10.5% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 10.2% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 10.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
