East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and Suriname are ranked 99th and 193rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in East Timor is 2,283% higher than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
East Timor
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 99/197 | 193/197 |
| Population |
1433311
|
644193
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 67.2% | 33.5% |
| Urban population | 32.8% | 66.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
East Timor vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 50.8%, compared to a 23.4% growth in Suriname.
In 2004, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 99th place now. Suriname was 186th in 2004 and ranks 193rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 231 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 218 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 175 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 6.7 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 6.66 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 6.59 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 6.49 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 6.4 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 6.33 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 6.17 |
| 1983 | 118 | 6.11 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 6.08 |
| 1981 | 115 | 6.06 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 6.06 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 6.09 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 6.16 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 6.21 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 6.27 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 6.31 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 6.35 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 6.39 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 6.41 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 6.32 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 6.12 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 5.92 |
| 1968 | 93 | 5.72 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 5.53 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 5.34 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 5.16 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 4.99 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 4.79 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 4.58 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 32.8% | 66.5% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 66.4% |
| 2022 | 32.1% | 66.3% |
| 2021 | 31.7% | 66.2% |
| 2020 | 31.3% | 66.1% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | 66.1% |
| 2018 | 30.6% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 30.2% | 66% |
| 2016 | 29.8% | 66% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 66.1% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | 66.1% |
| 2012 | 28.4% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 28.1% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 27.7% | 66.3% |
| 2009 | 27.4% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 27% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 26.7% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | 26.4% | 66.6% |
| 2005 | 26% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 25% | 66.6% |
| 2001 | 24.6% | 66.5% |
| 2000 | 24.3% | 66.4% |
| 1999 | 23.9% | 66.4% |
| 1998 | 23.6% | 66.3% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 66.2% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 66.1% |
| 1995 | 22.5% | 66.1% |
| 1994 | 22.2% | 66% |
| 1993 | 21.9% | 65.9% |
| 1992 | 21.5% | 65.9% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 20.8% | 65.7% |
| 1989 | 20.4% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 19.9% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 19.5% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 19% | 65.4% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 65.3% |
| 1984 | 18.1% | 65.3% |
| 1983 | 17.7% | 65.2% |
| 1982 | 17.3% | 65.1% |
| 1981 | 16.9% | 65% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 65% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 62.8% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 60.6% |
| 1977 | 15.3% | 58.3% |
| 1976 | 15% | 56.1% |
| 1975 | 14.6% | 53.7% |
| 1974 | 14.2% | 51.4% |
| 1973 | 13.9% | 49.1% |
| 1972 | 13.5% | 46.8% |
| 1971 | 13.2% | 45.7% |
| 1970 | 12.9% | 45.9% |
| 1969 | 12.6% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 12.3% | 46.4% |
| 1967 | 11.9% | 46.6% |
| 1966 | 11.6% | 46.9% |
| 1965 | 11.4% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 11.1% | 47.3% |
| 1963 | 10.8% | 47.4% |
| 1962 | 10.5% | 47.3% |
| 1961 | 10.2% | 47.3% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 47.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor and from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
