The Dominican Republic has a population density of 614 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. The Dominican Republic has 45,844 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Dominican Republic and Latvia are ranked 49th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Dominican Republic has 0.14% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in the Dominican Republic is 692% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 614 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 49/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
11591984
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 18,609 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 45,399 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 15% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 85% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.6% | 0% |
the Dominican Republic vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Dominican Republic increased by 25.8%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, the Dominican Republic ranked 43rd for population density and is in 49th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 614 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 609 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 603 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 598 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 592 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 585 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 578 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 572 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 566 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 559 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 553 | 83 |
| 2013 | 547 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 540 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 533 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 526 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 520 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 513 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 507 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 501 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 495 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 488 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 481 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 475 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 468 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 460 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 453 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 446 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 438 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 431 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 423 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 415 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 407 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 399 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 391 | - |
| 1990 | 383 | - |
| 1989 | 375 | - |
| 1988 | 368 | - |
| 1987 | 360 | - |
| 1986 | 352 | - |
| 1985 | 345 | - |
| 1984 | 337 | - |
| 1983 | 330 | - |
| 1982 | 322 | - |
| 1981 | 315 | - |
| 1980 | 307 | - |
| 1979 | 299.7 | - |
| 1978 | 292.3 | - |
| 1977 | 285 | - |
| 1976 | 277.7 | - |
| 1975 | 270.6 | - |
| 1974 | 263.5 | - |
| 1973 | 256.4 | - |
| 1972 | 249.4 | - |
| 1971 | 242.6 | - |
| 1970 | 235.9 | - |
| 1969 | 229.3 | - |
| 1968 | 222.9 | - |
| 1967 | 216.5 | - |
| 1966 | 210.3 | - |
| 1965 | 204.2 | - |
| 1964 | 198.3 | - |
| 1963 | 192.4 | - |
| 1962 | 186.6 | - |
| 1961 | 180.8 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 85% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 84.4% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 83.8% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 83.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 82.5% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 81.8% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 81.1% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 80.3% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 79.4% | 68% |
| 2015 | 78.6% | 68% |
| 2014 | 77.7% | 68% |
| 2013 | 76.7% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 75.8% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 74.8% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 73.8% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 72.5% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 71.3% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 70% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 68.7% | 68% |
| 2005 | 67.4% | 68% |
| 2004 | 66% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 64.6% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 63.4% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 62.6% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 60.9% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 60.1% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 59.3% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 58.4% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 57.6% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 56.8% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 56% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 55.8% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 55.5% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 55.2% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 55% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 54.7% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 54.4% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 54.1% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 53.9% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 53.6% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 53.3% | 68% |
| 1982 | 53.1% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 52.4% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 51.3% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 50.2% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 49.1% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 47.9% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 46.8% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 45.7% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 44.6% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 43.5% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 42.4% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 41.4% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 40.3% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 39.2% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 38.2% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 37.1% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 36.1% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 35.1% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 34% | 56% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 32.1% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 31.1% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 30.2% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66% to 85% in the Dominican Republic and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago de los Caballeros | 1.34M |
| Santo Domingo | 1.13M |
| Puerto Plata | 338K |
| La Vega | 282K |
| Higuey | 251K |
| San Cristobal | 233K |
| San Pedro de Macoris | 217K |
| San Francisco de Macoris | 188K |
| San Juan de la Maguana | 169K |
| Bonao | 158K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons