East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 792 people in El Salvador. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 35,733 sq ft in El Salvador. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and El Salvador are ranked 99th and 33rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for El Salvador, hence the population density in East Timor is 69.2% lower than in El Salvador.
Population density comparison
East Timor
|
El Salvador
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 792 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 99/197 | 33/197 |
| Population |
1433311
|
6386184
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 8,000 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 35,188 sq ft |
| Rural population | 67.2% | 24% |
| Urban population | 32.8% | 76% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
East Timor vs El Salvador:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 50.8%, compared to a 5.55% growth in El Salvador.
In 2004, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 99th place now. El Salvador was 27th in 2004 and ranks 33rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
El Salvador
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 792 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 789 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 785 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 782 |
| 2020 | 231 | 779 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 778 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 777 |
| 2017 | 218 | 777 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 775 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 773 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 770 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 767 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 764 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 761 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 759 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 756 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 754 |
| 2007 | 175 | 751 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 750 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 751 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 751 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 750 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 748 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 746 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 743 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 739 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 735 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 731 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 726 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 720 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 714 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 707 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 698 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 687 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 675 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 662 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 649 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 637 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 624 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 612 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 600 |
| 1983 | 118 | 588 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 578 |
| 1981 | 115 | 571 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 568 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 560 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 549 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 538 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 526 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 512 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 501 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 489 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 478 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 467 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 456 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 444 |
| 1968 | 93 | 432 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 421 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 409 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 397 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 387 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 376 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 366 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 357 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
El Salvador
|
|
| 2024 | 32.8% | 76% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 75.4% |
| 2022 | 32.1% | 74.8% |
| 2021 | 31.7% | 74.1% |
| 2020 | 31.3% | 73.4% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | 72.7% |
| 2018 | 30.6% | 72% |
| 2017 | 30.2% | 71.3% |
| 2016 | 29.8% | 70.5% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 69.7% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | 68.9% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | 68% |
| 2012 | 28.4% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 28.1% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 27.7% | 65.5% |
| 2009 | 27.4% | 64.6% |
| 2008 | 27% | 63.7% |
| 2007 | 26.7% | 62.8% |
| 2006 | 26.4% | 62.2% |
| 2005 | 26% | 61.6% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 61.1% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 60.6% |
| 2002 | 25% | 60% |
| 2001 | 24.6% | 59.5% |
| 2000 | 24.3% | 58.9% |
| 1999 | 23.9% | 58.4% |
| 1998 | 23.6% | 57.8% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 56.5% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 55.3% |
| 1995 | 22.5% | 54% |
| 1994 | 22.2% | 52.7% |
| 1993 | 21.9% | 51.4% |
| 1992 | 21.5% | 50.3% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 49.8% |
| 1990 | 20.8% | 49.3% |
| 1989 | 20.4% | 48.8% |
| 1988 | 19.9% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 19.5% | 47.7% |
| 1986 | 19% | 47.2% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 46.7% |
| 1984 | 18.1% | 46.2% |
| 1983 | 17.7% | 45.6% |
| 1982 | 17.3% | 45.1% |
| 1981 | 16.9% | 44.6% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 44.1% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 43.6% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 43.1% |
| 1977 | 15.3% | 42.6% |
| 1976 | 15% | 42.1% |
| 1975 | 14.6% | 41.6% |
| 1974 | 14.2% | 41% |
| 1973 | 13.9% | 40.5% |
| 1972 | 13.5% | 40% |
| 1971 | 13.2% | 39.5% |
| 1970 | 12.9% | 39.4% |
| 1969 | 12.6% | 39.3% |
| 1968 | 12.3% | 39.2% |
| 1967 | 11.9% | 39.1% |
| 1966 | 11.6% | 39% |
| 1965 | 11.4% | 38.9% |
| 1964 | 11.1% | 38.8% |
| 1963 | 10.8% | 38.7% |
| 1962 | 10.5% | 38.6% |
| 1961 | 10.2% | 38.5% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 38.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor and from 61.1% to 76% in El Salvador.
Densely populated cities
|
El Salvador
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Salvador | 331K |
| Santa Ana | 251K |
| San Miguel | 233K |
| Soyapango | 230K |
| Mejicanos | 137K |
| Apopa | 129K |
| Ahuachapan | 127K |
| Santa Tecla | 126K |
| Sonsonate | 72.2K |
| Usulutan | 66.1K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
