Australia has a population density of 9.16 people per square mile compared to 244 people in East Timor. Australia has 3,043,442 sq ft of land per person vs 114,650 sq ft in East Timor. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Australia and East Timor are ranked 196th and 99th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for East Timor, hence the population density in Australia is 96.2% lower than in East Timor.
Population density comparison
Australia
|
East Timor
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.16 ppl/mi² | 244 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 99/197 |
| Population |
27677455
|
1433311
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 5,741 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,043,440 sq ft | 114,276 sq ft |
| Rural population | 13.2% | 67.2% |
| Urban population | 86.8% | 32.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 62.6% | 0% |
Australia vs East Timor:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Australia increased by 36.3%, compared to a 50.8% growth in East Timor.
In 2004, Australia ranked 190th for population density and is in 196th place now. East Timor was 109th in 2004 and ranks 99th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 9.16 | 244 |
| 2023 | 8.97 | 241.1 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 238.5 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 235.2 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 231 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 226.6 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 222.2 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 218 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 213.9 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 209.9 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 205.9 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 201.8 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 197.7 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 193.4 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | 188.9 |
| 2009 | 7.31 | 184.4 |
| 2008 | 7.16 | 179.8 |
| 2007 | 7.02 | 175 |
| 2006 | 6.89 | 170.1 |
| 2005 | 6.8 | 165.2 |
| 2004 | 6.72 | 161.8 |
| 2003 | 6.65 | 159.7 |
| 2002 | 6.57 | 153.1 |
| 2001 | 6.5 | 141.5 |
| 2000 | 6.42 | 129.8 |
| 1999 | 6.34 | 145.4 |
| 1998 | 6.27 | 164.2 |
| 1997 | 6.21 | 159.8 |
| 1996 | 6.14 | 155.4 |
| 1995 | 6.07 | 151.2 |
| 1994 | 6 | 147.1 |
| 1993 | 5.95 | 143.1 |
| 1992 | 5.89 | 139.2 |
| 1991 | 5.83 | 135.6 |
| 1990 | 5.75 | 132.4 |
| 1989 | 5.67 | 129.7 |
| 1988 | 5.57 | 127.3 |
| 1987 | 5.48 | 125.1 |
| 1986 | 5.4 | 123.2 |
| 1985 | 5.32 | 121.3 |
| 1984 | 5.25 | 119.6 |
| 1983 | 5.19 | 118 |
| 1982 | 5.12 | 116.5 |
| 1981 | 5.03 | 115 |
| 1980 | 4.95 | 113.2 |
| 1979 | 4.89 | 111.2 |
| 1978 | 4.84 | 109.5 |
| 1977 | 4.78 | 107.7 |
| 1976 | 4.73 | 105.8 |
| 1975 | 4.68 | 104.2 |
| 1974 | 4.63 | 102.9 |
| 1973 | 4.51 | 101.5 |
| 1972 | 4.44 | 99.8 |
| 1971 | 4.36 | 98.1 |
| 1970 | 4.22 | 96.3 |
| 1969 | 4.13 | 94.6 |
| 1968 | 4.05 | 93 |
| 1967 | 3.98 | 91.4 |
| 1966 | 3.93 | 89.8 |
| 1965 | 3.84 | 88.3 |
| 1964 | 3.76 | 86.9 |
| 1963 | 3.69 | 85.4 |
| 1962 | 3.62 | 84.1 |
| 1961 | 3.53 | 82.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 86.8% | 32.8% |
| 2023 | 86.6% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 86.5% | 32.1% |
| 2021 | 86.4% | 31.7% |
| 2020 | 86.2% | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 86.1% | 30.9% |
| 2018 | 86% | 30.6% |
| 2017 | 85.9% | 30.2% |
| 2016 | 85.8% | 29.8% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 29.5% |
| 2014 | 85.6% | 29.1% |
| 2013 | 85.5% | 28.8% |
| 2012 | 85.4% | 28.4% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 28.1% |
| 2010 | 85.2% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | 85.1% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 84.9% | 27% |
| 2007 | 84.8% | 26.7% |
| 2006 | 84.7% | 26.4% |
| 2005 | 84.6% | 26% |
| 2004 | 84.5% | 25.7% |
| 2003 | 84.3% | 25.3% |
| 2002 | 84.2% | 25% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 24.6% |
| 2000 | 84.2% | 24.3% |
| 1999 | 84.4% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 84.5% | 23.6% |
| 1997 | 84.6% | 23.2% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 84.9% | 22.5% |
| 1994 | 85% | 22.2% |
| 1993 | 85.2% | 21.9% |
| 1992 | 85.3% | 21.5% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 20.8% |
| 1989 | 85.5% | 20.4% |
| 1988 | 85.5% | 19.9% |
| 1987 | 85.5% | 19.5% |
| 1986 | 85.6% | 19% |
| 1985 | 85.6% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 85.6% | 18.1% |
| 1983 | 85.6% | 17.7% |
| 1982 | 85.7% | 17.3% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 16.9% |
| 1980 | 85.6% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 85.4% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 85.3% | 15.7% |
| 1977 | 85.1% | 15.3% |
| 1976 | 84.9% | 15% |
| 1975 | 84.8% | 14.6% |
| 1974 | 84.6% | 14.2% |
| 1973 | 84.5% | 13.9% |
| 1972 | 84.3% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 84.2% | 13.2% |
| 1970 | 84% | 12.9% |
| 1969 | 83.8% | 12.6% |
| 1968 | 83.7% | 12.3% |
| 1967 | 83.5% | 11.9% |
| 1966 | 83.3% | 11.6% |
| 1965 | 83.1% | 11.4% |
| 1964 | 82.8% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 10.8% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 10.5% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 10.2% |
| 1960 | 81.5% | 10.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.5% to 86.8% in Australia and from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
