East Timor has a population density of 250.2 people per square mile compared to 2,352 people in Palestine. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 12,251 sq ft in Palestine. East Timor and Palestine rank 98th and 8th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.004% of the land area for Palestine, making the population density in East Timor 89.4% lower than in Palestine.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
East Timor
|
Palestine
|
|
| 2026 | 250.2 | 2,352 |
| 2025 | 247.1 | 2,311 |
| 2024 | 244 | 2,274 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 2,221 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 2,168 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 2,116 |
| 2020 | 231 | 2,067 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 2,016 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 1,966 |
| 2017 | 218 | 1,917 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 1,879 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 1,837 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 1,796 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 1,754 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 1,712 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 1,671 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 1,629 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 1,587 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 1,545 |
| 2007 | 175 | 1,503 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 1,466 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 1,429 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 1,392 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 1,357 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 1,323 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 1,290 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 1,257 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 1,225 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 1,195 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 1,164 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 1,113 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 1,065 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 1,018 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 973 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 931 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 890 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 851 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 819 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 766 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 745 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 729 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 697 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 670 |
| 1983 | 118 | 648 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 629 |
| 1981 | 115 | 611 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 595 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 579 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 564 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 548 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 532 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 516 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 499 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 484 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 474 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 469 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 471 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 476 |
| 1968 | 93 | 483 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 485 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 484 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 480 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 472 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 464 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 457 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 449 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/palestine | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in East Timor increased by 47.1%, compared to a 60.5% growth in Palestine.
In 2006, East Timor ranked 109th by population density and is 98th now. Palestine was 11th in 2006 and ranks 8th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
East Timor
|
Palestine
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 250.2 ppl/mi² | 2,352 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 98/197 | 8/197 |
| Population |
1441764
|
5500288
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 2,326 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 12,261 sq ft |
| Rural population | 71.3% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 28.7% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Palestine
|
|
| 2024 | 28.7% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 28.6% | 86.9% |
| 2022 | 28.6% | 86.6% |
| 2021 | 28.8% | 86.3% |
| 2020 | 29% | 86.1% |
| 2019 | 29.1% | 85.8% |
| 2018 | 29.2% | 85.5% |
| 2017 | 29.4% | 85.4% |
| 2016 | 29.4% | 85.3% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 85.2% |
| 2014 | 29.5% | 85% |
| 2013 | 29.6% | 84.8% |
| 2012 | 29.6% | 84.5% |
| 2011 | 29.6% | 84.2% |
| 2010 | 29.6% | 83.9% |
| 2009 | 29.4% | 83.5% |
| 2008 | 28.8% | 83.1% |
| 2007 | 28% | 82.6% |
| 2006 | 27.1% | 81.8% |
| 2005 | 26.3% | 80.5% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 79% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 77.3% |
| 2002 | 24.9% | 75.5% |
| 2001 | 24.5% | 73.7% |
| 2000 | 24.1% | 72.1% |
| 1999 | 23.8% | 70.6% |
| 1998 | 23.5% | 69.5% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 68.7% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 68.1% |
| 1995 | 22.6% | 67.5% |
| 1994 | 22.3% | 67% |
| 1993 | 22% | 66.5% |
| 1992 | 21.7% | 66.1% |
| 1991 | 21.3% | 65.7% |
| 1990 | 21% | 65.3% |
| 1989 | 20.6% | - |
| 1988 | 20.3% | - |
| 1987 | 19.8% | - |
| 1986 | 19.4% | - |
| 1985 | 19% | - |
| 1984 | 18.5% | - |
| 1983 | 18.1% | - |
| 1982 | 17.6% | - |
| 1981 | 17.1% | - |
| 1980 | 16.6% | - |
| 1979 | 16.2% | - |
| 1978 | 15.7% | - |
| 1977 | 15.2% | - |
| 1976 | 14.7% | - |
| 1975 | 14.3% | - |
| 1974 | 13.8% | - |
| 1973 | 13.4% | - |
| 1972 | 13% | - |
| 1971 | 12.6% | - |
| 1970 | 12.2% | - |
| 1969 | 11.8% | - |
| 1968 | 11.5% | - |
| 1967 | 11.2% | - |
| 1966 | 10.9% | - |
| 1965 | 10.7% | - |
| 1964 | 10.5% | - |
| 1963 | 10.3% | - |
| 1962 | 10.2% | - |
| 1961 | 10.1% | - |
| 1960 | 10.1% | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/palestine | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 25.7% to 28.7% in East Timor and from 79% to 87.1% in Palestine.
Densely populated cities
|
Palestine
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Gaza | 590K |
| Ashdod | 220K |
| Hebron | 215K |
| Nablus | 178K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/palestine | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2015–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.