Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 536 people in Nepal. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 53,430 sq ft in Nepal. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and Nepal are ranked 155th and 55th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.36% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Nepal, hence the population density in Latvia is 85.5% lower than in Nepal.
Population density comparison
Latvia
|
Nepal
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 536 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 55/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
29627185
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 55,348 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 52,039 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 77.6% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 22.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Latvia vs Nepal:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 14% growth in Nepal.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. Nepal was 45th in 2004 and ranks 55th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Nepal
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 536 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 537 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 537 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 533 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 523 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 513 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 507 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 506 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 505 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 503 |
| 2014 | 83 | 500 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 498 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 497 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 496 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 494 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 491 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 488 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 484 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 480 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 475 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 470 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 464 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 458 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 451 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 443 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 437 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 429 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 421 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 412 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 403 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 393 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 384 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 373 |
| 1991 | - | 363 |
| 1990 | - | 354 |
| 1989 | - | 345 |
| 1988 | - | 338 |
| 1987 | - | 331 |
| 1986 | - | 324 |
| 1985 | - | 317 |
| 1984 | - | 309 |
| 1983 | - | 302 |
| 1982 | - | 295.2 |
| 1981 | - | 288.4 |
| 1980 | - | 281.7 |
| 1979 | - | 275.1 |
| 1978 | - | 268.8 |
| 1977 | - | 262.6 |
| 1976 | - | 256.8 |
| 1975 | - | 251.2 |
| 1974 | - | 245.7 |
| 1973 | - | 240.4 |
| 1972 | - | 235.3 |
| 1971 | - | 230.2 |
| 1970 | - | 225.2 |
| 1969 | - | 220.4 |
| 1968 | - | 215.6 |
| 1967 | - | 211.1 |
| 1966 | - | 206.6 |
| 1965 | - | 202.4 |
| 1964 | - | 198.3 |
| 1963 | - | 194.3 |
| 1962 | - | 190.6 |
| 1961 | - | 186.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Nepal
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 22.4% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 21.9% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 21.5% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 21% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 20.6% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 20.2% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 19.7% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 19.3% |
| 2016 | 68% | 18.9% |
| 2015 | 68% | 18.6% |
| 2014 | 68% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 17.8% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 17.5% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 17.1% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 16.8% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 16.4% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 16.1% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 15.8% |
| 2006 | 68% | 15.5% |
| 2005 | 68% | 15.1% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 14.8% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 14.5% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 14.2% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 13.9% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 13.4% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 12.9% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 12.3% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 11.8% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 11.3% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 10.9% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 10.4% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 10% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 9.58% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 9.18% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 8.85% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 8.54% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 8.24% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 7.94% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 7.66% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 7.39% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 7.12% |
| 1983 | 68% | 6.86% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 6.62% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 6.38% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 6.09% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 5.82% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 5.55% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 5.3% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 5.06% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 4.83% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 4.61% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 4.4% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 4.2% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 4.01% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 3.96% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 3.91% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 3.87% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 3.82% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 3.78% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 3.74% |
| 1964 | 56% | 3.69% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 3.65% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 3.61% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 3.57% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 3.48% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 14.8% to 22.4% in Nepal.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
