The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 244 people in East Timor. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 114,650 sq ft in East Timor. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and East Timor are ranked 69th and 99th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for East Timor, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 49.7% higher than in East Timor.
Population density comparison
Czech Republic
|
East Timor
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 244 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 99/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
1433311
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 5,741 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 114,276 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 67.2% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 32.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 0% |
the Czech Republic vs East Timor:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 50.8% growth in East Timor.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. East Timor was 109th in 2004 and ranks 99th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Czech Republic
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 244 |
| 2023 | 365 | 241.1 |
| 2022 | 358 | 238.5 |
| 2021 | 353 | 235.2 |
| 2020 | 359 | 231 |
| 2019 | 358 | 226.6 |
| 2018 | 357 | 222.2 |
| 2017 | 355 | 218 |
| 2016 | 354 | 213.9 |
| 2015 | 354 | 209.9 |
| 2014 | 353 | 205.9 |
| 2013 | 353 | 201.8 |
| 2012 | 352 | 197.7 |
| 2011 | 352 | 193.4 |
| 2010 | 351 | 188.9 |
| 2009 | 350 | 184.4 |
| 2008 | 348 | 179.8 |
| 2007 | 345 | 175 |
| 2006 | 343 | 170.1 |
| 2005 | 342 | 165.2 |
| 2004 | 342 | 161.8 |
| 2003 | 342 | 159.7 |
| 2002 | 342 | 153.1 |
| 2001 | 342 | 141.5 |
| 2000 | 344 | 129.8 |
| 1999 | 345 | 145.4 |
| 1998 | 345 | 164.2 |
| 1997 | 345 | 159.8 |
| 1996 | 346 | 155.4 |
| 1995 | 346 | 151.2 |
| 1994 | 346 | 147.1 |
| 1993 | 346 | 143.1 |
| 1992 | - | 139.2 |
| 1991 | - | 135.6 |
| 1990 | - | 132.4 |
| 1989 | - | 129.7 |
| 1988 | - | 127.3 |
| 1987 | - | 125.1 |
| 1986 | - | 123.2 |
| 1985 | - | 121.3 |
| 1984 | - | 119.6 |
| 1983 | - | 118 |
| 1982 | - | 116.5 |
| 1981 | - | 115 |
| 1980 | - | 113.2 |
| 1979 | - | 111.2 |
| 1978 | - | 109.5 |
| 1977 | - | 107.7 |
| 1976 | - | 105.8 |
| 1975 | - | 104.2 |
| 1974 | - | 102.9 |
| 1973 | - | 101.5 |
| 1972 | - | 99.8 |
| 1971 | - | 98.1 |
| 1970 | - | 96.3 |
| 1969 | - | 94.6 |
| 1968 | - | 93 |
| 1967 | - | 91.4 |
| 1966 | - | 89.8 |
| 1965 | - | 88.3 |
| 1964 | - | 86.9 |
| 1963 | - | 85.4 |
| 1962 | - | 84.1 |
| 1961 | - | 82.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Czech Republic
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 32.8% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 32.1% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 31.7% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 30.9% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 30.6% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 30.2% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 29.8% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 29.5% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 29.1% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 28.8% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 28.4% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 28.1% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 27% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 26.7% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 26.4% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 26% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 25.7% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 25.3% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 25% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 24.6% |
| 2000 | 74% | 24.3% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 23.6% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 23.2% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 22.5% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 22.2% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 21.9% |
| 1992 | 75% | 21.5% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 20.8% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 20.4% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 19.9% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 19.5% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 19% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 18.1% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 17.7% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 17.3% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 16.9% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 15.7% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 15.3% |
| 1976 | 71% | 15% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 14.6% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 14.2% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 13.9% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 13.2% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 12.9% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 12.6% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 12.3% |
| 1967 | 63% | 11.9% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 11.6% |
| 1965 | 62% | 11.4% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 61% | 10.8% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 10.5% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 10.2% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 10.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor.
Densely populated cities
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
