Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 148.9 people in Nicaragua. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 187,291 sq ft in Nicaragua. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and Nicaragua are ranked 155th and 132nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Nicaragua, hence the population density in Latvia is 47.9% lower than in Nicaragua.
Population density comparison
Latvia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 148.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 132/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
7079664
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 46,464 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 187,291 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 39.8% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 60.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Latvia vs Nicaragua:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 31.2% growth in Nicaragua.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. Nicaragua was 126th in 2004 and ranks 132nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 148.9 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 146.9 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 144.9 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 143 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 141.3 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 139.5 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 137.7 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 135.9 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 134.1 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 132.3 |
| 2014 | 83 | 130.6 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 128.8 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 127 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 125.2 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 123.5 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 121.7 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 120 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 118.3 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 116.6 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 115 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 113.5 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 112.2 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 110.8 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 109.5 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 108.1 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 106.6 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 105.1 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 103.5 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 101.8 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 99.9 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 97.9 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 95.9 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 93.8 |
| 1991 | - | 91.7 |
| 1990 | - | 89.6 |
| 1989 | - | 87.5 |
| 1988 | - | 85.5 |
| 1987 | - | 83.6 |
| 1986 | - | 81.7 |
| 1985 | - | 79.8 |
| 1984 | - | 77.9 |
| 1983 | - | 76 |
| 1982 | - | 74 |
| 1981 | - | 72 |
| 1980 | - | 70 |
| 1979 | - | 68.1 |
| 1978 | - | 66.3 |
| 1977 | - | 64.4 |
| 1976 | - | 62.5 |
| 1975 | - | 60.6 |
| 1974 | - | 58.8 |
| 1973 | - | 57 |
| 1972 | - | 55.4 |
| 1971 | - | 53.8 |
| 1970 | - | 52.1 |
| 1969 | - | 50.5 |
| 1968 | - | 49 |
| 1967 | - | 47.5 |
| 1966 | - | 46 |
| 1965 | - | 44.6 |
| 1964 | - | 43.3 |
| 1963 | - | 42 |
| 1962 | - | 40.7 |
| 1961 | - | 39.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 60.2% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 59.8% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 59.6% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 59.3% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 59% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 58.8% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 58.5% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 58.3% |
| 2016 | 68% | 58.1% |
| 2015 | 68% | 57.9% |
| 2014 | 68% | 57.7% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 57.5% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 57.3% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 57.1% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 56.9% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 56.7% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 56.5% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 56.3% |
| 2006 | 68% | 56.1% |
| 2005 | 68% | 55.9% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 55.8% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 55.6% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 55.5% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 55.3% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 55.2% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 55% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 54.9% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 54.7% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 54.6% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 54.4% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 54.2% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 53.9% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 53.6% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 53.4% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 53.1% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 52.8% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 52.5% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 52.2% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 52% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 51.7% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 51.4% |
| 1983 | 68% | 51.1% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 50.8% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 50.6% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 50.3% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 50% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 49.7% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 49.5% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 49.2% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 48.9% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 48.6% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 48.3% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 48.1% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 47.8% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 47% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 45.3% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 44.4% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 43.6% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 42.7% |
| 1964 | 56% | 41.9% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 41% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 40.5% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 40% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 39.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 55.8% to 60.2% in Nicaragua.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
