East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 202.9 people in Serbia. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 144,613 sq ft in Serbia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and Serbia are ranked 99th and 110th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Serbia, hence the population density in East Timor is 20.2% higher than in Serbia.
Population density comparison
East Timor
|
Serbia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 202.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 99/197 | 110/197 |
| Population |
1433311
|
6541064
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 32,467 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 137,408 sq ft |
| Rural population | 67.2% | 42.6% |
| Urban population | 32.8% | 57.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 18.2% |
East Timor vs Serbia:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 43.4%, compared to a 7.56% decline in Serbia.
In 2006, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 99th place now. Serbia was 87th in 2006 and ranks 110th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 202.9 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 204 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 205.3 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 210.5 |
| 2020 | 231 | 212.5 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 205.7 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 206.8 |
| 2017 | 218 | 207.9 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 209 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 210.1 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 211.2 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 212.2 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 213.3 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 214.3 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 215.9 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 216.8 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 217.7 |
| 2007 | 175 | 218.6 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 219.5 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | - |
| 2004 | 161.8 | - |
| 2003 | 159.7 | - |
| 2002 | 153.1 | - |
| 2001 | 141.5 | - |
| 2000 | 129.8 | - |
| 1999 | 145.4 | - |
| 1998 | 164.2 | - |
| 1997 | 159.8 | - |
| 1996 | 155.4 | - |
| 1995 | 151.2 | - |
| 1994 | 147.1 | - |
| 1993 | 143.1 | - |
| 1992 | 139.2 | - |
| 1991 | 135.6 | - |
| 1990 | 132.4 | - |
| 1989 | 129.7 | - |
| 1988 | 127.3 | - |
| 1987 | 125.1 | - |
| 1986 | 123.2 | - |
| 1985 | 121.3 | - |
| 1984 | 119.6 | - |
| 1983 | 118 | - |
| 1982 | 116.5 | - |
| 1981 | 115 | - |
| 1980 | 113.2 | - |
| 1979 | 111.2 | - |
| 1978 | 109.5 | - |
| 1977 | 107.7 | - |
| 1976 | 105.8 | - |
| 1975 | 104.2 | - |
| 1974 | 102.9 | - |
| 1973 | 101.5 | - |
| 1972 | 99.8 | - |
| 1971 | 98.1 | - |
| 1970 | 96.3 | - |
| 1969 | 94.6 | - |
| 1968 | 93 | - |
| 1967 | 91.4 | - |
| 1966 | 89.8 | - |
| 1965 | 88.3 | - |
| 1964 | 86.9 | - |
| 1963 | 85.4 | - |
| 1962 | 84.1 | - |
| 1961 | 82.8 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 32.8% | 57.4% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 57.1% |
| 2022 | 32.1% | 56.9% |
| 2021 | 31.7% | 56.7% |
| 2020 | 31.3% | 56.4% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | 56.3% |
| 2018 | 30.6% | 56.1% |
| 2017 | 30.2% | 55.9% |
| 2016 | 29.8% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 55.7% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | 55.6% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | 55.5% |
| 2012 | 28.4% | 55.4% |
| 2011 | 28.1% | 55.2% |
| 2010 | 27.7% | 55% |
| 2009 | 27.4% | 54.8% |
| 2008 | 27% | 54.5% |
| 2007 | 26.7% | 54.3% |
| 2006 | 26.4% | 54.1% |
| 2005 | 26% | 53.9% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 53.7% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 53.4% |
| 2002 | 25% | 53.2% |
| 2001 | 24.6% | 53% |
| 2000 | 24.3% | 52.8% |
| 1999 | 23.9% | 52.5% |
| 1998 | 23.6% | 52.3% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 52.1% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 51.9% |
| 1995 | 22.5% | 51.7% |
| 1994 | 22.2% | 51.4% |
| 1993 | 21.9% | 51.2% |
| 1992 | 21.5% | 51% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 50.8% |
| 1990 | 20.8% | 50.4% |
| 1989 | 20.4% | 50% |
| 1988 | 19.9% | 49.6% |
| 1987 | 19.5% | 49.2% |
| 1986 | 19% | 48.8% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 48.3% |
| 1984 | 18.1% | 47.9% |
| 1983 | 17.7% | 47.5% |
| 1982 | 17.3% | 47.1% |
| 1981 | 16.9% | 46.7% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 46.1% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 45.5% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 44.9% |
| 1977 | 15.3% | 44.3% |
| 1976 | 15% | 43.7% |
| 1975 | 14.6% | 43.1% |
| 1974 | 14.2% | 42.5% |
| 1973 | 13.9% | 41.9% |
| 1972 | 13.5% | 41.3% |
| 1971 | 13.2% | 40.7% |
| 1970 | 12.9% | 39.7% |
| 1969 | 12.6% | 38.6% |
| 1968 | 12.3% | 37.5% |
| 1967 | 11.9% | 36.4% |
| 1966 | 11.6% | 35.3% |
| 1965 | 11.4% | 34.2% |
| 1964 | 11.1% | 33.1% |
| 1963 | 10.8% | 32.1% |
| 1962 | 10.5% | 31.1% |
| 1961 | 10.2% | 30.1% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 29.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor and from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
