Kiribati has a population density of 443 people per square mile compared to 76.2 people in Latvia. Kiribati has 64,895 sq ft of land per person vs 372,581 sq ft in Latvia. Kiribati and Latvia rank 61st and 158th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Kiribati has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0005% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, making the population density in Kiribati 481% higher than in Latvia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Kiribati
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2026 | 443 | 76.2 |
| 2025 | 437 | 77 |
| 2024 | 430 | 77.7 |
| 2023 | 424 | 78.4 |
| 2022 | 417 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 410 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 403 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 396 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 390 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 385 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 379 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 374 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 369 | 83 |
| 2013 | 364 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 359 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 354 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 348 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 340 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 333 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 326 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 320 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 313 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 307 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 301 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 295 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 288.8 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 283.3 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 278.6 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 273.9 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 269.1 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 264.2 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 259.7 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 255.9 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 252.1 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 248.3 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 244.2 | - |
| 1990 | 239.4 | - |
| 1989 | 233.9 | - |
| 1988 | 228.4 | - |
| 1987 | 223 | - |
| 1986 | 217.6 | - |
| 1985 | 212.6 | - |
| 1984 | 208.6 | - |
| 1983 | 205.2 | - |
| 1982 | 201.9 | - |
| 1981 | 198.6 | - |
| 1980 | 195.5 | - |
| 1979 | 192.4 | - |
| 1978 | 191.4 | - |
| 1977 | 192.7 | - |
| 1976 | 194 | - |
| 1975 | 195 | - |
| 1974 | 195.7 | - |
| 1973 | 194.5 | - |
| 1972 | 191.1 | - |
| 1971 | 187.5 | - |
| 1970 | 183.9 | - |
| 1969 | 180.2 | - |
| 1968 | 177.6 | - |
| 1967 | 175.9 | - |
| 1966 | 174 | - |
| 1965 | 170.9 | - |
| 1964 | 166.6 | - |
| 1963 | 162.4 | - |
| 1962 | 158.4 | - |
| 1961 | 154.5 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/kiribati/latvia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Kiribati increased by 38.5%, compared to a 17.5% decline in Latvia.
In 2006, Kiribati ranked 65th by population density and is 61st now. Latvia was 141st in 2006 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Kiribati
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 443 ppl/mi² | 76.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 61/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
139020
|
1829763
|
| Land area | 313 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 64,815 sq ft | 358,946 sq ft |
| Rural population | 37.5% | 31.5% |
| Urban population | 62.5% | 68.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Kiribati
|
Latvia
|
|
| 2024 | 62.5% | 68.5% |
| 2023 | 61.5% | 68.4% |
| 2022 | 60.6% | 68.3% |
| 2021 | 59.6% | 68.2% |
| 2020 | 58.4% | 68.1% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 68.1% |
| 2018 | 54.5% | 68% |
| 2017 | 53% | 68% |
| 2016 | 51.8% | 67.9% |
| 2015 | 51% | 67.9% |
| 2014 | 50.4% | 67.9% |
| 2013 | 50% | 67.8% |
| 2012 | 49.6% | 67.8% |
| 2011 | 49.1% | 67.8% |
| 2010 | 48.5% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 47.4% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 45.9% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 44.6% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 43.7% | 67.9% |
| 2005 | 43.5% | 67.9% |
| 2004 | 43.5% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 43.5% | 67.9% |
| 2002 | 43.5% | 68% |
| 2001 | 43.5% | 68% |
| 2000 | 43.3% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 42.3% | 68.1% |
| 1998 | 40.5% | 68.3% |
| 1997 | 38.6% | 68.5% |
| 1996 | 37.1% | 68.8% |
| 1995 | 36.3% | 69.2% |
| 1994 | 36% | 69.6% |
| 1993 | 35.7% | 69.9% |
| 1992 | 35.5% | 70.2% |
| 1991 | 35.3% | 70.5% |
| 1990 | 35% | 70.7% |
| 1989 | 34.7% | 70.8% |
| 1988 | 34.4% | 70.8% |
| 1987 | 34.1% | 70.7% |
| 1986 | 33.8% | 70.5% |
| 1985 | 33.5% | 70.3% |
| 1984 | 33.3% | 70% |
| 1983 | 33.1% | 69.6% |
| 1982 | 32.9% | 69.2% |
| 1981 | 32.7% | 68.8% |
| 1980 | 32.4% | 68.4% |
| 1979 | 32.1% | 68% |
| 1978 | 31.6% | 67.6% |
| 1977 | 30.5% | 67.1% |
| 1976 | 29% | 66.5% |
| 1975 | 27.4% | 65.9% |
| 1974 | 26.1% | 65.3% |
| 1973 | 25.5% | 64.7% |
| 1972 | 25.1% | 64% |
| 1971 | 24.8% | 63.4% |
| 1970 | 24.5% | 62.7% |
| 1969 | 24.2% | 62.1% |
| 1968 | 23.7% | 61.6% |
| 1967 | 22.9% | 61% |
| 1966 | 21.9% | 60.5% |
| 1965 | 20.7% | 60% |
| 1964 | 19.5% | 59.4% |
| 1963 | 18.2% | 58.9% |
| 1962 | 17% | 58.3% |
| 1961 | 16% | 57.7% |
| 1960 | 15.2% | 57.1% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/kiribati/latvia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 43.5% to 62.5% in Kiribati and from 67.9% to 68.5% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
|
Latvia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Riga | 595K |
| Daugavpils | 78.1K |
| Liepaja | 67.4K |
| Jelgava | 54.8K |
| Jurmala | 52K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/kiribati/latvia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.