Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 96.3 people in the United States. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 310,997 sq ft in the United States. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and the United States are ranked 155th and 149th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 4.18% of the population and 6.14% of the land area for the United States, hence the population density in Latvia is 19.5% lower than in the United States.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 96.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 149/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
343323530
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 3,531,839 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 289,500 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 16.5% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 83.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 7.68% |
Latvia vs the United States:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 16.3% growth in the United States.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. The United States was 145th in 2004 and ranks 149th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 96.3 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 94.8 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 94.4 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 94 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 93.9 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 93 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 92.5 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 92.1 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 91.5 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 90.8 |
| 2014 | 83 | 90.1 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 89.5 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 88.9 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 88.2 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 87.6 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 86.9 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 86.1 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 85.2 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 84.3 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 83.5 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 82.8 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 82 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 81.3 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 80.6 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 79.8 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 79 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 78.1 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 77.2 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 76.3 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 75.4 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 74.5 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 73.6 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 72.6 |
| 1991 | - | 71.7 |
| 1990 | - | 70.7 |
| 1989 | - | 69.8 |
| 1988 | - | 69.1 |
| 1987 | - | 68.5 |
| 1986 | - | 67.9 |
| 1985 | - | 67.3 |
| 1984 | - | 66.7 |
| 1983 | - | 66.1 |
| 1982 | - | 65.5 |
| 1981 | - | 64.9 |
| 1980 | - | 64.1 |
| 1979 | - | 63.6 |
| 1978 | - | 62.9 |
| 1977 | - | 62.3 |
| 1976 | - | 61.7 |
| 1975 | - | 61.1 |
| 1974 | - | 60.5 |
| 1973 | - | 59.9 |
| 1972 | - | 59.4 |
| 1971 | - | 58.7 |
| 1970 | - | 58 |
| 1969 | - | 57.3 |
| 1968 | - | 56.8 |
| 1967 | - | 56.2 |
| 1966 | - | 55.6 |
| 1965 | - | 54.9 |
| 1964 | - | 54.3 |
| 1963 | - | 53.5 |
| 1962 | - | 52.7 |
| 1961 | - | 51.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 83.5% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 83.3% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 83.1% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 82.9% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 82.7% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 82.5% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 82.3% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 82.1% |
| 2016 | 68% | 81.9% |
| 2015 | 68% | 81.7% |
| 2014 | 68% | 81.5% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 81.3% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 81.1% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 80.9% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 80.8% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 80.6% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 80.4% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 80.3% |
| 2006 | 68% | 80.1% |
| 2005 | 68% | 79.9% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 79.8% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 79.6% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 79.4% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 79.2% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 79.1% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 78.7% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 78.4% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 78% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 77.6% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 77.3% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 76.9% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 76.5% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 76.1% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 75.7% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 75.3% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 75.1% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 74.9% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 74.8% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 74.6% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 74.5% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 74.3% |
| 1983 | 68% | 74.2% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 74% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 73.9% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 73.7% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 73.7% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 73.7% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 73.7% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 73.7% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 73.7% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 73.6% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 73.6% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 73.6% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 73.6% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 73.6% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 73.3% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 73% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 72.6% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 72.2% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 71.9% |
| 1964 | 56% | 71.5% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 71.1% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 70.8% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 70.4% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 70% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 79.8% to 83.5% in the United States.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| New York | 8.8M |
| Los Angeles | 3.9M |
| Chicago | 2.75M |
| Houston | 2.3M |
| Phoenix | 1.61M |
| Philadelphia | 1.6M |
| San Antonio | 1.43M |
| San Diego | 1.39M |
| Dallas | 1.3M |
| San Jose | 1.01M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons